Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ainsworth, A. 1992. Advances in speech hearing and language processing. London, JAI Press.
Ainsworth, W. A. 1976. Mechanisms of speech recognition. Oxford, Pergamon Press: 42.
Ainsworth, W. A. and J. B. Millar. 1972. The effect of relative formant amplitude on the perceived identity of synthetic vowels. Language and Speech 15: 328.
Armstrong, M., P. Pegg, C. James and P. J. Blamey. 1997. Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. American Journal of Otology 18: S140–S141.
Arndt, P., S. Staller, J. Arcaroli, A. Hines and K. Ebinger. 1999. Within-subject comparison of advanced coding strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. Cochlear Corporation Report.
Balkany, T., W. Bogess and B. Dinner. 1988. Binaural cochlear implantation: comparison of 3M/House and Nucleus 22 devices with evidence of sensory integration. Laryngoscope 98: 1040–1043.
Barry, J. G., P. J. Blamey and L. F. A. Martin. 2002a. A multidimensional scaling analysis of tone discrimination ability in Cantonese-speaking children using a cochlear implant. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 16: 101–113.
Barry, J. G., P. J. Blamey, L. F. A. Martin, et al. 2002b. Tone discrimination in Cantonese-speaking children with cochlear implants. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 16: 79–99.
Battmer, R.-D., D. Gnadeberg, D. J. Allum-Mecklenberg and T. Lenarz. 1994. Matched-pair comparisons for adults using the Clarion or Nucleus devices. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 251–254.
Bench, R. J. and J. Bamford. 1979. Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children. London, Academic Press.
Blamey, P. J. 1990. Multimodal stimulation for speech perception. In: Rowe, M. and L. Aitkin, eds. Information processing in mammalian auditory and tactile systems. New York, Wiley-Liss: 267–280.
Blamey, P. J. and G. M. Clark. 1990. Place coding of vowel formants for cochlear implant patients. British Journal of Audiology 88: 667–673.
Blamey, P. J., R. C. Dowell, A. M. Brown, G. M. Clark and P. M. Seligman. 1987. Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82: 48–57.
Blamey, P. J., R. C. Dowell, Y. C. Tong, A. M. Brown, S. M. Luscombe and G. M. Clark. 1984a. Speech processing studies using an acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76: 104–110.
Blamey, P. J., R. C. Dowell, Y. C. Tong and G. M. Clark. 1984b. An acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76: 97–103.
Blamey, P. J., L. F. Martin and G. M. Clark. 1985. A comparison of three speech coding strategies using an acoustic model of a cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77: 209–217.
Blamey, P. J., E. Parisi and G. M. Clark. 1995. Pitch matching of electric and acoustic stimuli. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 220–222.
Blamey, P. J., B. C. Pyman, M. Gordon, et al. 1992. Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 101: 342–348.
Boothroyd, A. 1968. Developments in speech audiometry. Sound 2: 3–10.
Brophy, J. T. 1977. Basic electronics for scientists. 3rd edition. Tokyo, McGraw Kogakusha.
Bruce, I. C., L. S. Irlicht, M. W. White, S. J. O’Leary and G. M. Clark. 2000. Renewal-process approximation of a stochastic threshold model for electrical neural stimulation. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 9: 119–132.
Buden, S. V., M. Brown, A. G. Paolini and G. M. Clark. 1996. Temporal and entrainment response properties of cochlear nucleus neurons to intra cochleal electrical stimulation in the cat. Proceedings of the Australian Neuroscience Society 7: 104.
Burian, K., B. Eisenwort, E. Hochmair and I. Hochmair-Desoyer. 1984. Clinical experience with the “Vienna cochlear implant.” In Keidel, W. D. and P. Finkenzeller, eds. Cochlear implants in clinical use. Advances in audiology. Basel, Karger 2: 19–29.
Carhart, R. 1965. Monaural and binaural discrimination against competing sentences. International Audiology 4: 5–10.
Chao, Y R. 1930. A system of tone letters. Le Maître Phonétique 45: 24–27.
Chomsky, N. and M. Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York, Harper and Row.
Chouard, C. H., C. Fugain, B. Meyer and F. Chabolle. 1985. The Chorimac-12. A multichannel cochlear implant for total deafness. Description and clinical results. Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica 39(4): 735–748.
Chouard, C. H., B. Meyer, F. Chabolle, N. Alcaras and D. Gegu. 1984. Sound signal processing. Acta Oto-Laryngologica-supplement 411: 95–104.
Clark, G. M. 1969. Responses of cells in the superior olivary complex of the cat to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Experimental Neurology 24: 124–136.
Clark, G. M. 1986. The University of Melbourne/Cochlear Corporation (Nucleus) program. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 19: 329–354.
Clark, G. M. 1987. The University of Melbourne-Nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. Volume 38. Basel, Karger.
Clark, G. M. 2001. Editorial Cochlear implants: climbing new mountains. The Graham Fraser Memorial Lecture 2001. Cochlear Implants International 2(2): 75–97.
Clark, G. M., R. C. Black, D. J. Dewhurst, I. C. Forster, J. F. Patrick and Y. C. Tong. 1977. A multiple-electrode hearing prosthesis for cochlear implantation in deaf patients. Medical Progress Through Technology 5: 127–140.
Clark, G. M., R. C. Black, I. C. Forster, J. F. Patrick and Y. C. Tong. 1978. Design criteriaof a multiple-electrode cochlear implant hearing prosthesis. Journal of the AcousticalSociety of America 63: 631–633.
Clark, G. M., G. J. Dooley and P. J. Blamey. 1991. Combined electrical and acoustical stimulation using a bimodal speech processor. American Pediatric Otolaryngological Society Meeting, Hawaii, May.
Clark, G. M., R. C. Dowell, R. S. C. Cowan, B. C. Pyman and R. L. Webb. 1996. Multicenter evaluations of speech perception in adults and children with the Nucleus (Cochlear) 22-channel cochlear implant. In: Portmann, M., ed. Transplants and implants in otology III. Amsterdam, Kugler: 353–363.
Clark, G. M. and Y C. Tong. 1981. Multiple-electrode cochlear implant for profound or total hearing loss: a review. Medical Journal of Australia 1: 428–429.
Clark, G. M. and Y C. Tong. 1982. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. A summary of results for two patients. Archives of Otolaryngology 108: 214–217.
Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong, Q. R. Bailey, et al. 1978. A multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Oto-Laryngological Society of Australia 4: 208–212.
Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong, R. C. Black, I. C. Forster, J. F. Patrick and D. J. Dewhurst. 1977. A multiple electrode cochlear implant. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 91: 935–945.
Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong and R. C. Dowell. 1984. Comparison of two cochlear implant speech-processing strategies. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 93: 127–131.
Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong and L. F. Martin. 1981a. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. An evaluation using open-set CID sentences. Laryngoscope 91: 628–634.
Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong, L. F. Martin and P. A. Busby. 1981b. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. An evaluation using an open-set word test. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 91: 173–175.
Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong, L. F. A. Martin, et al. 1981c. A multiple-channel cochlear implant: an evaluation using nonsense syllables. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 90: 227–230.
Cohen, N. L., S. B. Waltzman and S. G. Fisher. 1993. A prospective, randomised study of cochlear implants. New England Journal of Medicine 328: 233–282.
Collins, L., T. Zwolan, J. O’Neill and G. Wakefield. 1994. Analysis of electrode pair confusions and implications for speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners. In: Popelka, G.R, ed. Abstracts of the Seventeenth Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg, FL: 161.
Davis, H. and S. R. Silverman. 1978. Hearing and deafness, 4th edition. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Delattre, P., A. M. Liberman and F. S. Cooper. 1952. An experimental study of the acoustic determinants of vowel color observations on one and two formant vowels synthesised from spectrographic patterns. Word 8: 195–210.
Dewhurst, D. J. 1976. An introduction of biomedical instrumentation. London, Pergamon Press.
Dirks, D. D., T. S. Bell, R. N. Rossman and G. E. Kincaid. 1986. Articulation index predictions of contextually dependent works. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80: 82–92.
Dooley, G. J., P. J. Blamey, P. M. Seligman, et al. 1993. Combined electrical and acoustical stimulation using a bimodal prosthesis. Archives of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery 119: 55–60.
Dorman, M. F. 1993. Speech perception by adults. In: Tyler, R. S., ed. Cochlear implants. Audiological foundations. San Diego, Singular: 145–190.
Dorman, M. F., K. Dankowski and G. McCandless. 1989. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of channels of stimulation by patients who use the Symbion cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 10: 288–291.
Dorman, M. F., P. C. Loizou, J. Fitzke and Z. Tu. 1998. The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104: 3583–3585.
Dorman, M. F., P. C. Loizou and D. Rainey. 1997. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102: 2403–2411.
Dorman, M. F., S. Soli, K. Dankowski, L. M. Smith, G. McCandless and J. Parkin. 1990. Acoustic cues for consonant identification by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88(5): 2074–2079.
Dowell, R. C. 1991. Speech perception in noise for multichannel cochlear implant users. PhD thesis. University of Melbourne.
Dowell, R. C., G. M. Clark, P. M. Seligman, P. J. Blamey, A. M. Brown and Y. C. Tong. 1986a. Perception of connected speech without lipreading, using a multichannel hearing prosthesis. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 102: 7–11.
Dowell, R. C., M. A. Marsh, R. D. Hollow, et al. 1993. Clinical comparison of open-set speech perception with the MSP and WSPIII speech processors and preliminary results for the new SPEAK processor. Abstracts of Third International Cochlear Implant Conference, Innsbruck: 14.6.
Dowell, R. C., L. F. Martin, Y. C. Tong, G. M. Clark, P. M. Seligman and J. F. Patrick. 1982. A 12-consonant confusion study on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 25: 509–516.
Dowell, R. C., D. J. Mecklenburg and G. M. Clark. 1986b. Speech recognition for 40 patients receiving multichannel cochlear implants. Archives of Otolaryngology 112: 1054–1059.
Dowell, R. C., J. F. Patrick, P. J. Blamey, P. M. Seligman, D. K. Money and G. M. Clark. 1987a. Signal processing in quiet and noise. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. Proceedings of the International Cochlear Implant Symposium, September 7–12, 1987. Duren, West Germany. 495–498.
Dowell, R. C., P. M. Seligman, P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1987b. Speech perception using a two-formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noise. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 104(5–6): 439–446.
Dowell, R. C., L. A. Whitford, P. M. Seligman, B. K.-H. Franz and G. M. Clark. 1990. Preliminary results with a miniature speech processor for the 22-electrode/Cochlear hearing prosthesis. In: Sacristan, T., ed. Otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery. Amsterdam, Kugler and Ghedini: 1167–1173.
Doyle, K. J., D. Mills, J. Larky, D. Kessler, W. M. Luxford and R. A. Schindler. 1995. Consonant perception by users of Nucleus and Clarion multichannel cochlear implants. American Journal of Otology 16: 676–681.
Dudley, H. 1939. The vocoder. Bell Labs Record 17: 122.
Dunn, H. K. 1950. The calculation of vowel resonances, and an electrical vocal tract. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22(6): 740–753.
Eddington, D. K. 1980. Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68: 885–891.
Eddington, D. K. 1983. Speech recognition in deaf subjects with multichannel intracochlear electrodes. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 405: 241–258.
Edgerton, B. J. 1985. Implications of optimized single-channel cochlear implants. Hearing Journal 38: 17–20.
Edgerton, B. J. and J. A. Brimacombe. 1984. Effects of signal processing by the House-3M cochlear implant on consonant perception. Acta Oto-Laryngologica-supplement 411: 115–123.
Erber, N. P. 1972. Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual speech recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 15: 413–422.
Fant, G. 1959. Acoustic analysis and synthesis of speech with applications to Swedish. Ericsson Technics 15: 3–108.
Fant, G. 1973. Speech sounds and features. Cambridge, MIT Press.
Fant, G. and J. Martony. 1962. Instrumentation for parametric synthesis (OVE II). Stockholm, Speech transmission lab QPR: 18.
Fishman, K. E., R. V. Shannon and W. H. Slattery. 1997. Speech recognition as a function of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant processor. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 40: 1201–1215.
Flanagan, J. L. 1957. Difference limen for formant amplitude. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 22: 205.
Flanagan, J. L. and L. R. Rabiner. 1973. Speech synthesis. Stroudsburg, Hutchinson and Ross.
Flanagan, J. L. and M. G. Saslow. 1958. Pitch discrimination for synthetic vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30(5): 435–442.
Fletcher, H. and J. C. Steinberg. 1929. Articulation testing methods. Bell Systems Technology Journal 8: 806–854.
Fourcin, A. J. 1968. Speech source inference. IEEE Transactions of Audio Electroacoustics AU-16: 65.
Fourcin, A. J., S. M. Rosen, B. C. Moore, et al. 1979. External electrical stimulation of the cochlea: clinical, psychophysical, speech-perceptual and histological findings. British Journal of Audiology 13(3): 85–107.
French, N. R. and J. C. Steinberg. 1947. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 19: 90–119.
Fry, D. B. 1979. The physics of speech. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Fu, Q.-J. and R. V. Shannon. 1999. Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105: 1889–1900.
Fugain, C., B. Meyer, F. Chabolle and C. H. Chouard. 1984. Clinical results of the French multichannel cochlear implant. Acta Oto-Laryngologica-supplement 411: 237–246.
Fujimura, O. 1962. Analysis of nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34: 1865–1875.
Gantz, B. J., B. F. McCabe, R. S. Tyler and J. P. Preece. 1987. Evaluation of four cochlear implant designs. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96: 145–147.
Gantz, B. J., R. S. Tyler, J. F. Knutson, et al. 1988. Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: audiologic assessment and predictors of performance. Laryngoscope 98: 1100–1106.
Geier, L. L. and S. J. Norton. 1992. The effects of limiting the number of Nucleus 22 cochlear implant electrodes programmed on speech perception. Ear and Hearing 13: 340–348.
Geurts, L. and J. Wouters. 1999. Enhancing the speech envelope of continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105: 2476–2484.
Grayden, D. B. and G. M. Clark. 2000. The effect of rate stimulation of the auditory nerve on phoneme recognition. In: Barlow, M., ed. Proceedings of the Eighth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 356–361.
Grayden, D. B. and G. M. Clark. 2001. Improved sound processor for cochlear implants. International patent application no. PCT/AU00/01038.
Green, J. D., D. M. Mills, B. A. Bell, W. M. Luxford and L. L. Tonokawa. 1992. Binaural cochlear implants. American Journal of Otology 13(6): 502–506.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1963. The tones of English. Archivum Linguisticum 15: 1.
Hanekom, J. J. and R. V. Shannon. 1996. Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users 43: 27–40.
Hartmann, R., G. Topp and R. Klinke. 1984a. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibres with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hearing Research 13: 47–62.
Hartmann, R., G. Topp and R. Klinke. 1984b. Electrical stimulation of the cat cochlea—discharge pattern of single auditory fibres. Advances in Audiology 1: 18–29.
Henry, B. A., C. M. McKay, H. J. McDermott and G. M. Clark. 2000. The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108: 1269–1280.
Hill, F. J., L. P. McRae and R. P. McClellan. 1968. Speech recognition as a function of channel capacity in a discrete set of channels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 44: 13–18.
Hirsh, I. J. 1950. The relation between localization and intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22: 196–200.
Hochmair, E. S. and I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer. 1983. Percepts elicited by different speech coding strategies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 405: 268–279.
Hochmair, E. S., I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer and K. Burian. 1979. Investigations towards an artificial cochlea. International Journal of Artificial Organs 2(5): 255–261.
Hochmair-Desoyer, I. J., E. S. Hochmair and K. Burian. 1981. Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses. Medical Progress Technology 8: 107–119.
Hochmair-Desoyer, I. J., E. S. Hochmair, R. E. Fischer and K. Burian. 1980. Cochlear prostheses in use: recent speech comprehension results. Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 229: 81–98.
Hollow, R. D., R. C. Dowell, R. S. C. Cowan, M. C. Skok, B. C. Pyman and G. M. Clark.
1995. Continuing improvements in speech processing for adult cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 292–294.
Holmes, A. E., F. J. Kemler and G. E. Merwin. 1987. The effects of varying the number of cochlear implant electrodes on speech perception. American Journal of Otology 8: 240–246.
House, W. F., K. I. Berliner and L. S. Eisenberg. 1981. The cochlear implant: 1980 update. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 91: 457–462.
Jeffress, L. A. 1948. A place theory of sound localization. Physiological Psychology 41: 35–39.
Kennedy, E., H. Levitt, A. C. Neuman and W. Weiss. 1998. Consonants-vowel intensity ratios for maximizing consonant recognition by hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103: 1098–1114.
Kessler, D. K., G. E. Loeb and M. J. Barker. 1995. Distribution of speech recognition results with the Clarion cochlear prosthesis. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 283–285.
Kewley-Port, D. and D. B. Pisoni. 1983. Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73: 1779–1793.
Kileny, P. R., T. A. Zwolan, S. Zimmerman-Phillips and J. L. Kemink. 1992. A comparison of round-window and transtympanic promontory electric stimulation in cochlear implant candidates. Ear and Hearing 13: 294–299.
Ladefoged, P. 1975. A course in phonetics. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Ladefoged, P. 1993. A course in phonetics. 3rd ed. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Laird, R. K. 1979. The bioengineering development of a sound encoder for an implantable hearing prosthesis for the profoundly deaf. Master of engineering science thesis. University of Melbourne.
Lawrence, W. 1953. The synthesis of speech from signals which have a low information rate. In: Communication theory. London, Butterworth: 460.
Lawson, D. T., B. S. Wilson, M. Zerbi and C. C. Finley. 1996. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Third quarterly progress report. NIH contract No. 1-DC-5-2103.
Lehiste, I. and G. E. Peterson. 1959. Vowel amplitude and phonemic stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 31: 428–435.
Lehiste, I. and G. E. Peterson. 1961. Transitions, glides and diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33: 268–277.
Liberman, A. M., P. C. Delattre and F. S. Cooper. 1958. Some cues for the distinction between voiced and voiceless stops in initial position. Language and Speech 1: 153.
Liberman, A. M., P. C. Delattre, F. S. Cooper and L. J. Gerstman. 1954. The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. Psychological Monographs 8: 1–13.
Liberman, A. M., P. C. Delattre, L. J. Gerstman. and F. S. Cooper. 1956. Tempo of frequency change as a cue for distinguishing classes of speech sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology 52: 127.
Liberman, A. M., K. S. Harris, H. S. Hoffman and B. C. Griffith. 1957. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54: 358.
Licklider, J. C. R. 1948. The influence of interaural phase upon the masking of speech by white noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 20: 150–159.
Lindblom, B. E. F. and M. Studdert-Kennedy. 1967. On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 42: 830–843.
Lisker, L. and A. S. Abramson. 1967. Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech 10: 1.
Litovsky, R. Y and H. S. Colburn. 1999. The precedence effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106: 1633–1654.
MacKeith, N. W. and R. R. Coles. 1971. Binaural advantages in hearing of speech. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 85: 213–232.
Martin, L. F. A., P. J. Blamey, C. James, K. L. Galvin and D. MacFarlane. 2000a. Adaptive range of optimisation for hearing aids. In: Barlow, M., ed. Proceedings of the Eighth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 373–378.
Martin, L. F. A., C. James, P. J. Blamey, et al. 2000b. Adaptive dynamic range optimisation for cochlear implants. Australian Journal of Audiology 22(suppl): 64.
Martin, L. F. A., C. James, P. J. Blamey, B. Swanson, Y. Just and D. S. MacFarlane. 1999. Adaptive dynamic range optimisation; pre-processing for cochlear implants. 1999 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Asilomar Conference Center, California: 127.
McDermott, H. J., C. M. McKay and A. Vandali. 1992. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multi-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 3367–3371.
McKay, C. M. and H. J. McDermott. 1993. Perceptual performance of subjects with cochlear implants using the spectral maxima sound processor (SMSP) and the mini speech processor (MSP). Ear and Hearing 14: 350–367.
McKay, C. M., H. J. McDermott and G. M. Clark. 1991. Preliminary results with a six spectral maxima speech processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus multiple electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Oto-Laryngological Society of Australia 6: 354–359.
McKay, C. M., H. J. McDermott and G. M. Clark. 1993. Temporal pitch coding for cochlear implantees: the effects of carrier rate and amplitude-modulation of pulsatile electrical stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93: 2333.
McKay, C. M., H. J. McDermott and G. M. Clark. 1994. The beneficial use of channel interactions for the improvement of speech perception for multichannel cochlear implants. Australian Journal of Audiology 15(2 suppl): 20–21.
McKay, C. M., H. J. McDermott, A. Vandali and G. M. Clark. 1992. A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP (Multipeak) processor. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 112: 752–761.
Merzenich, M., C. Byers and M. White. 1984. Scala tympani electrode arrays. Fifth quarterly progress report. NIH contract NO1-NS9-2353: 1–11.
Miller, G. A. and P. E. Nicely. 1955. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27(3): 338–352.
Muller-Deile, J., B. J. Schmidt and H. Rudert. 1995. Effects of noise on speech discrimination in cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 303–306.
Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 1085–1099.
Nordmark, J. O. 1968. Mechanisms of frequency discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 44(6): 1532–1540.
O’Connor, J. D., L. J. Gerstman, A. M. Liberman, P. C. Delattre and F. S. Cooper. 1957. Acoustic cues for the perception of initial /w,j.r.l/ in English. Word 13: 24.
O’Shaughnessy, D. 1987. Speech communication: human and machine. Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.
Paolini, A. G. and G. M. Clark. 1997. The effect of pulsatile intracochlear electrical stimulation on intracellularly recorded cochlear nucleus neurons. In: Clark, G. M., ed. Cochlear implants. XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi Editore: 119–124.
Parkinson, A. J., R. S. Tyler, G. G. Woodworth, M. W Lowder and B. J. Gantz. 1996. A within-subject comparison of adult patients using the Nucleus F0F1F2 and F0F1F2B3B4B5 speech processing strategies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 39: 261–277.
Pavlovic, C. V., G. A. Studebaker and R. L. Sherbecoe. 1986. An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80: 50–57.
Peissig, J. and B. Kollmeier. 1997. Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal hearing and impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105: 1660–1670.
Pelizzone, M., A. Kasper and P. Montandon. 1990. Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient. Hearing Research 48: 287–290.
Peterson, G. E. and H. L. Barney. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24: 175–184.
Peterson, P. M., S. M. Wei, W. M. Rabinowitz and P. M. Zurek. 1990. Robustness of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids. Acta Otolaryngology-supplement 469: 85–90.
Pickett, J. M. 1980. The sounds of speech communication. A primer of acoustic phonetics and speech perception. Baltimore, University Park Press: 194.
Plomp, R. 1975. Auditory psychophysics. Annual Review of Psychology 26: 207–232.
Plomp, R. 1976. Aspects of tone sensation: a psychophysical study. London, Academic Press.
Pollack, I. and J. M. Pickett. 1958. Stereophonic listening and speech intelligibility against voice babble. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30: 131–133.
Pols, L. C. W., L. J. T. Van Der Kamp and R. Plomp. 1969. Perceptual and physical space of vowel sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 46: 458–467.
Rabiner, L. R. and R. W. Schafer. 1978. Digital processing of speech signals. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
Remez, R. E., P. E. Rubin and D. B. Pisoni. 1981. Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science 212: 947–949.
Rose, J. E., J. F. Brugge, D. J. Anderson and J. E. Hind. 1967. Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 30: 769–93.
Rose, J. E., J. F. Brugge, D. J. Anderson and J. E. Hind. 1969. Time structure of discharges in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey in response to complex periodic sounds. Journal of Neurophysiology 32: 386–401.
Rosen, S. 1989. Temporal information in speech and its relevance for cochlear implants. In: Fraysse, B. and N. Cochard, eds. Cochlear implant: acquisitions and controversies. International Symposium, Toulouse: 3–26.
Sammeth, C. A., M. F. Dorman and C. J. Stearns. 1999. The role of consonant-vowel intensity ratio in the recognition of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with hearing impairment. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 42: 42–55.
Schindler, R. A., D. K. Kessler and M. A. Barker. 1995. Clarion patient performance: an update on the clinical trials. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 269–272.
Schroeder, M. R. 1968. Reference signal for signal quality studies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 44: 1735–1736.
Schroeder, M. R. and E. E. David. 1960. A vocoder for transmitting 10kc/s speech over a 3.5 kc/s channel. Acustica 10: 35.
Seligman, P. M. and H. J. McDermott. 1995. Architecture of the SPECTRA 22 speech processor. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 139–141.
Shannon, R. V., A. Jensvold, M. Padilla, M. E. Robert and X. Wang. 1999. Consonant recordings for speech testing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106: L71–L74.
Shannon, R. V., F.-G. Zeng, V. Kamath, J. Wygonski and M. Ekelid. 1995. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270: 303–304.
Shannon, R. V., F.-G. Zeng and J. Wygonski. 1998. Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104: 2467–2476.
Singh, S. 1968. A distinctive feature analysis of responses to a multiple choice intelligibility test. International Review of Applied Linguistics 6: 37–53.
Skinner, M. W., G. M. Clark, L. A. Whitford, et al. 1994. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channels cochlear implant system. American Journal of Otology 15: 15–27.
Skinner, M. W., L. K. Holden, T. A. Holden, M. E. Demorest and M. S. Fourakis. 1997. Speech recognition as simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101: 3766–3782.
Skinner, M. W., L. K. Holden, T. A. Holden, et al. 1991. Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 12: 3–22.
Skinner, M. W., L. K. Holden, L. A. Whitford, K. L. Plant, C. Psarros and T. A. Holden. 2002. In press. Speech recognition with the Nucleus 24 SPEAK, Ace, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults. Ear and Hearing 23: 207–223.
Skinner, M. W., M. M. Karstaedt and J. D. Miller. 1982. Amplification bandwidth and speech intelligibility for two listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 21: 251–268.
Soede, W., A. J. Berkhout and F. A. Bilson. 1993. Development of a directional hearing instrument based on array technology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94: 785–798.
Stevens, K. N. and S. E. Blumstein. 1981. The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features. In: Einnas, P. D. and J. L. Miller, eds. Perspectives on the study of speech. Hillsdale NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum: 1–38.
Strevens, P. 1960. Spectra of fricative noise in human speech. Language and Speech 3: 32.
Summerfield, A. Q. and M. P. Haggard. 1972. Speech rate effects in the perception of voicing. Speech Synthesis and Perception 6: 1.
Throckmorton, C. S. and L. M. Collins. 1999. Investigation of the effects of temporal and spatial interactions on speech-recognition skills in cochlear-implant subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105: 861–873.
Tong, Y. C., R. C. Black, G. M. Clark, et al. 1979. A preliminary report on a multiple-channel cochlear implant operation. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 93: 679–695.
Tong, Y. C., P. J. Blamey, R. C. Dowell and G. M. Clark. 1983a. Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74: 73–80.
Tong, Y C, G. M. Clark, P. M. Seligman and J. F. Patrick. 1980. Speech processing for a multiple-electrode cochlear implant hearing prosthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68: 1897–1899.
Tong, Y C, R. C. Dowell, P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1983b. Two-component hearing sensations produced by two-electrode stimulation in the cochlea of a deaf patient. Science 219: 993–994.
Tong, Y. C., W. K. Lai, M. Denison, et al. 1989. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Third quarterly progress report. NIH No. 1-DC-9-2400.
Tong, Y. C., R. van Hoesel, W. K. Lai, A. Vandali, J. M. Harrison and G. M. Clark. 1990. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Sixth quarterly progress report. NIH Contract No. 1-DC-9-2400.
Tong, Y. C., A. Vandali, J. M. Harrison, R. van Hoesel, J. S. Chang and G. M. Clark. 1991. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Eighth quarterly progress report. NIH Contract No. 1-DC-9-2400.
Turner, C. W., P. E. Souza and L. N. Forget. 1995. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 2568–2576.
Tye-Murray, N., R. S. Tyler, G. G. Woodworth and B. J. Gantz. 1992. Performance over time with a Nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 13: 200–209.
Tyler, R. S. and M. W. Lowder. 1992. Audiological management and performance of adult cochlear-implant patients. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal 71: 117–128.
Tyler, R. S., B. C. J. Moore and F. K. Kuk. 1989. Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32: 887–911.
van Hoesel, R., R. Ramsden and M. O’Driscoll. 2002. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. Ear and Hearing 23(2): 137–149.
van Hoesel, R. and R. Tyler. Submitted. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
van Hoesel, R. J. M. and G. M. Clark. 1993. Cochlear implant-bilateral psychophysical, speech and processing studies. Human Communications Research Centre 6th Annual Report: 13–16.
van Hoesel, R. J. M. and G. M. Clark. 1995a. Evaluation of a portable two-microphone adaptive beamforming speech processor with cochlear implant patients. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 2498–2503.
van Hoesel, R. J. M. and G. M. Clark. 1995b. Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 233–235.
van Hoesel, R. J. M. and G. M. Clark. 1997. Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102: 495–507.
van Hoesel, R. J. M. and G. M. Clark. 1999. Speech results with a bilateral multi-channel cochlear implant subject for spatially separated signal and noise. Australian Journal of Audiology 21: 23–28.
van Hoesel, R. J. M., Y. C. Tong, R. D. Hollow and G. M. Clark. 1993. Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94: 3178–3189.
van Hoesel, R. J. M., Y C. Tong, R. D. Hollow, J. Huigen and G. M. Clark. 1990. Preliminary studies on a bilateral cochlear implant user. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88(suppl 1): S193.
van Tasell, D. J., D. G. Greenfield, J. J. Logemann and D. A. Nelson. 1992. Temporal cues for consonant recognition: training, talker generalization, and use in evaluation of cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92: 1247–1257.
Van Tasell, D. J., S. D. Soli and V. M. Kirby. 1987. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82(4): 1152–1161.
Vandali, A. E. 2001. Emphasis of short-duration acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109: 2049–2061.
Vandali, A. E., J. M. Harrison, J. Huigen, K. Plant and G. M. Clark. 1995. Multichannel cochlear implant speech processing: further variations of the Spectral Maxima sound processor strategy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166):378–381.
Vandali, A. E., L. A. Whitford, K. L. Plant and G. M. Clark. 2000. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing 21: 608–624.
Wang, W. S.-Y. 1959. Transition and release as perceptual cues for final plosives. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 2: 66.
Wilson, B. S. 1997. The future of cochlear implants. British Journal of Audiology 31: 205–225.
Wilson, B. S. 2000. Strategies for representing speech information with cochlear implants. In: Niparko, J. K., ed. Cochlear implants: principles and practice. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Wilson, B. S., C. C. Finley, J. C. Farmer, et al. 1988. Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 98: 1069–1077.
Wilson, B. S., D. T. Lawson, M. Zerbi and C. C. Finley. 1992. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Twelfth quarterly progress report, April. 1992. NIH contract No. 1-DC-9-2401. Research Triangle Institute.
Wilson, B. S., D. T. Lawson, M. Zerbi and C. C. Finley. 1993. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Fifth quarterly progress report, Oct. 1993. NIH contract No. 1-DC-2-2401. Research Triangle Institute.
Xu, S., R. C. Dowell and G. M. Clark. 1987. Results for Chinese and English in a multichannel cochlear implant patient. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96(suppl 128): 126–127.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2003). Speech (Sound) Processing. In: Clark, G. (eds) Cochlear Implants. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95583-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21550-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive