This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–186.
Benett, Y. (1993). The validity and Reliability of Assessments and Self-assessments of Work-based Learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Education, 18(2), 81–94.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.
Birenbaum, M. (1996). Assessment 2000: Towards a Pluralistic Approach to Assessment. In M. Birenbaum, & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge (pp. 3–29). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
Birenbaum, M., & Dochy, F. (Eds.). (1996). Alternatives in Assessment of Achievement, Learning Processes andprior Knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Bond, L. (1995). Unintended Consequences of Performance Assessment: Issues of Bias and Fairness. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Winter 1995, 21–24.
Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The University of Learning. London: Kogan Page
Brown, S., & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing learners in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
Calfee, R. (1983). Establishing instructional validity for minimum competence programs. In G. F. Madaus, The courts, validity, and minimum competence testing (pp. 95–114). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Churchill, G. A. (1996). Basic Marketing Research. Orlando: The Dryden Press.
De Corte, E. (1990). A State-of-the-art of research on teaming and teaching. Keynote lecture presented at the first European Conference on the First Year Experience in Higher Education, Aalborg University, Denmark, 23–25 April 1990.
De Haan, D. M. (1992). Measuring test-curriculum overlap. Enschede: Febo.
Des Marchais, J. E., & Dumais, B. (1993). An Attempt at Measuring Student Ability to Analyze Problems in the Sherbrooke Problem-Based Curriculum: a Preliminary Study. In D. Boud & G. Feletti (Eds.), The challenge of problem based learning. London: Kogan Page.
Dolmans, D. (1994). How students learn in a problem-based curriculum. Maastricht: Universitaire Pers.
Engel, C. E. (1991). Not just a method but a way of learning. In D. Boud & G. Feletti (Eds.), The challenge of problem based learning. London: Kogan Page.
English, F. W. (1992). Deciding what to teach and test. Newbury Park California: Sage Publications Company, Corwin Press, INC.
Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1993). Learning, Teaching, and Testing for Complex Conceptual Understanding. In N. Frederiksen, R. J. Mislevy, & I. I. Bejar (Eds.), Test theory for a New Generation of Tests (pp. 178–193). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn (pp. 40–56). In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.). Assessment matters in Higher Education. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Glaser, R. (1990). Toward new models for assessment. International Journal of Educational Research, 14, 475–483.
Leinhardt, G., & Seewald, A. M. (1981). Overlap: What’s Tested, What’s Taught? Journal of Educational Measurement, 18(2), 85–95.
Linn, R. L., Baker, E., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 16, 1–21.
McClung, M. S. (1979). Competency testing programs: Legal and educational issues. Fordham Law review, 47, 6511–712.
Moss, P. A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in Educational Measurement: Implications for Performance Assessment. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 229–258.
Nuy, H. J. P. (1991). Interaction of study orientation and students’ appreciation of structure in their educational environment. Higher Education, 22, 267–274.
Poikela, E., & Poikela, S. (1997). Conceptions of Learning and Knowledge — Impacts on the Implementation of Problem-based Learning. Zeitschriftfur Hochschuldidactik, 21(1), 8–21.
Powney, J., & Watts, J. (1987). Interviewing in educational research. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and the perceptions of the academic environment, Higher Education. 8, 411–428.
Ramsden, P. (1998). Improving Learning. New perspectives. London: Kogan Page.
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (1997). “But is it fair?”: an exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349–371.
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework. Educational Technology, Sept–Oct., 31–38.
Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1995). Scenario Planning: a Tool for Strategic Thinking. Sloan Management Review, 25–39.
Segers, M. S. R. (1996). Assessment in a Problem-Based Economics Curriculum. In M. Birenbaum, & F. J. R. C. Dochy, F. (Eds.), Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge (pp. 201–224). Boston/ Dordrecht/ London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Shavelson, R. J., Gao, X., & Baxter, G. P. (1996). On the content validity of performance assessments: Centrality of domain specification. In M. Birenbaum, & F. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Learning (pp. 131–143). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
Thomson, K., & Falchikov, N. (1998). “Full on Unitil the Sun Comes Out”: the effects of assessment on student appoaches to studying. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 379–390.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Segers, M. (2003). Evaluating the Over All Test: Looking for Multiple Validity Measures. In: Segers, M., Dochy, F., Cascallar, E. (eds) Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards. Innovation and Change in Professional Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48125-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48125-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1260-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48125-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive