Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adema, J. J. (1990). The construction of customized two-stage tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 241–253.
Armstrong, R. D., & Jones, D. H. (1992). Polynomi alalgorithms for item matching. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 271–288.
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick, Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397–479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chang, H., &; Ying, Z. (1999). α-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211–222.
Chang, H.-H., & Ying, Z. (in press). Nonlinear designs for logistic item response models with application in computerized adaptive tests. The Annals of Statistics.
Cordova, M. J. (1998). Optimization methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Ferguson, T. S. (1996). A course in large-sample theory. London: Chapman & Hall.
Hetter, R. D., Sympson, J. B. (1997). Item exposure in CAT-ASVAB. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 141–144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
ILOG, Inc. (1998). CPLEX 6.0 [Computer Program and Manual]. Incline Village, NV: ILOG.
Kingsbury, G. G. & Zara, A. R. (1991). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359–375.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Luecht, R.D. (1988). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 224–236.
Luecht, R.M. & Hirsch, T.M. (1992). Computerizedtest constructionusing average growth approximation of target information functions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 41–52.
Luecht, R. M. & Nungester, R. J. (1998). Some practical examples of computer-adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 229–249.
Segall, D. O. (1997). Equating the CAT-ASVAB. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 81–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Stocking, M. L. & Lewis, C. (1998). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57–75.
Swanson, L. & Stocking, M. L. (1993). A model and heuristic for solving very large item selection problems. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 151–166.
Sympson, J. B. & Hetter, R. D. (1985, October). Controlling item-exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the Military Testing Association (pp. 973–977). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Timminga, E. van der Linden, W. J., & Schweizer, D. A. (1997). ConTEST 2.0: A decision support system for item banking and optimal test assembly [Computer program and manual]. Groningen, The Netherlands: iec ProGAMMA
van der Linden, W. J. (1998a). Optimal assembly of psychological and educational tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 195–211.
van der Linden, W.J. (1998b). Bayesian item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 62, 201–216.
van der Linden, W.J. (1999). A procedure for empirical initialization of the trait estimator in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 21–29.
van der Linden, W.J. (2000a). Optimal assembly of tests with item sets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24. (In press).
van der Linden, W. J. (2000b). Adaptive testing with equated number-correct scoring. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24. (In press).
van der Linden, W. J. (2000c). On complexity in computer-based testing. In G. N. Mills, M. Potenza, J. J. Fremer & W. Ward (Eds.). Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van der Linden, W. J. & Adema, J. J. (1998). Simultaneous assembly of multiple test forms. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 185–198 [Erratum in Vol. 36, 90–91).
van der Linden, W. J. & Chang, H.-H. (submitted) Alpha-stratified multistage adaptive testing with large numbers of content constraints.
van der Linden, W. J. &, Luecht, R. M. (1998). Observed equating as a test assembly problem. Psychometrika, 62, 401–418.
van der Linden, W. J. & Reese, L. M. (1998). A model for optimal constrained adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 259–270.
van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L. (1999). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195–210.
van der Linden, W. J., & Boekkooi-Timminga, E. (1989). A maximin model for test design with practical constraints. Psychometrika, 54, 237–247.
Veldkamp, B.P. (submitted). Modifications of the branch-and-bound algorithm for application in constrained adaptive testing.
Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters in computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185–201.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van der Linden, W.J. (2000). Constrained Adaptive Testing with Shadow Tests. In: van der Linden, W.J., Glas, G.A. (eds) Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47531-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47531-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6425-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47531-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive