Abstract
Background
Poor screw-to-bone fixation is a clinical problem that can lead to screw loosening. Under-tapping (UT) the pedicle screw has been evaluated biomechanically in the past. The objective of the study was to determine if pedicle preparation with a sequential tapping technique will alter the screw-to-bone fixation strength using a stress relaxation testing loading protocol.
Materials and Methods
Three thoracolumbar calf spines were instrumented with pedicle screws that were either probed, UT, standard-tapped (ST), or sequential tapped to prepare the pedicle screw track and a stress relaxation protocol was used to determine pull-out strength. The maximum torque required for pedicle screw insertion and pull-out strength was reported. A one-way ANOVA and Tukeys post-hoc test were used to determine statistical significance.
Results
The pedicle screw insertion torques for the probed, UT, ST and sequentially tapped (SQT) techniques were 5.09 (±1.08) Nm, 5.39 (±1.61) Nm, 2.93 (±0.43) Nm, and 3.54 (±0.67) Nm, respectively. There is a significant difference between probed compared to ST (P ≤ 0.05), as well as UT compared to both ST and SQT (P ≤ 0.05). The pull-out strength for pedicle screws for the probed, UT, ST and SQT techniques was 2443 (±782) N, 2353(±918) N, 2474 (±521) N, and 2146 (±582) N, respectively, with no significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) between techniques.
Conclusions
The ST technique resulted in the highest pull-out strength while the SQT technique resulted in the lowest. However, there was no significant difference in the pull-out strength for the various preparation techniques and there was no correlation between insertion torque and pull-out strength. This suggests that other factors such as bone density may have a greater influence on pull-out strength.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barber JW, Boden SD, Ganey T, Hutton WC. Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws: Does convergence affect axial pullout strength? J Spinal Disord 1998;11:215–20.
Chao KH, Lai YS, Chen WC, Chang CM, McClean CJ, Fan CY, et al. Biomechanical analysis of different types of pedicle screw augmentation: A cadaveric and synthetic bone sample study of instrumented vertebral specimens. Med Eng Phys 2013;35:1506–12.
Kwok AW, Finkelstein JA, Woodside T, Hearn TC, Hu RW. Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone. Spine (Phila Pa 1976. 1996;21:2429–34.
Lei W, Wu Z. Biomechanical evaluation of an expansive pedicle screw in calf vertebrae. Eur Spine J 2006;15:321–6.
Lill CA, Schneider E, Goldhahn J, Haslemann A, Zeifang F. Mechanical performance of cylindrical and dual core pedicle screws in calf and human vertebrae. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006;126:686–94.
Chatzistergos PE, Sapkas G, Kourkoulis SK. The influence of the insertion technique on the pullout force of pedicle screws: An experimental study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:E332–7.
George DC, Krag MH, Johnson CC, Van Hal ME, Haugh LD, Grobler LJ. Hole preparation techniques for transpedicle screws. Effect on pull-out strength from human cadaveric vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991;16:181–4.
Inceoglu S, Akbay A, McLain RF. Stress relaxation at the bone-pedicle screw interface in human bone. Spine (Phila Pa 1976. 2006;31:1321–6.
Silva P, Rosa RC, Shimano AC, Defino HL. Effect of pilot hole on biomechanical and in vivo pedicle screw-bone interface. Eur Spine J 2013;22:1829–36.
Inceoglu S, McLain RF, Cayli S, Kilincer C, Ferrara L. Stress relaxation of bone significantly affects the pull-out behavior of pedicle screws. J Orthop Res 2004;22:1243–7.
Pfeiffer FM, Abernathie DL, Smith DE. A comparison of pullout strength for pedicle screws of different designs: A study using tapped and untapped pilot holes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:E867–70.
Defino HL, Rosa RC, Silva P, Shimano AC, Volpon JB, de Paula FJ, et al. The effect of repetitive pilot-hole use on the insertion torque and pullout strength of vertebral system screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:871–6.
Ricci WM, Tornetta P 3rd, Petteys T, Gerlach D, Cartner J, Walker Z, et al. A comparison of screw insertion torque and pullout strength. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24:374–8.
Zdeblick TA, Kunz DN, Cooke ME, McCabe R. Pedicle screw pullout strength. Correlation with insertional torque. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:1673–6.
Myers BS, Belmont PJ Jr, Richardson WJ, Yu JR, Harper KD, Nightingale RW. The role of imaging and in situ biomechanical testing in assessing pedicle screw pull-out strength. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:1962–8.
Kuklo TR, Lehman RA Jr. Effect of various tapping diameters on insertion of thoracic pedicle screws: A biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:2066–71.
Inceoglu S, Ferrara L, McLain RF. Pedicle screw fixation strength: Pullout versus insertional torque. Spine J 2004;4:513–8.
Kuhns CA, Reiter M, Pfeiffer F, Choma TJ. Surgical strategies to improve fixation in the osteoporotic spine: The effects of tapping, cement augmentation, and screw trajectory. Global Spine J 2014;4:47–54.
Akbay A, Bozkurt G, Ilgaz O, Palaoglu S, Akalan N, Benzel EC. A demineralized calf vertebra model as an alternative to classic osteoporotic vertebra models for pedicle screw pullout studies. Eur Spine J 2008;17:468–73.
Seller K, Wahl D, Wild A, Krauspe R, Schneider E, Linke B. Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: A product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1047–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moldavsky, M., Salloum, K., Bucklen, B. et al. In vitro biomechanical study of pedicle screw pull-out strength based on different screw path preparation techniques. IJOO 50, 177–182 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177572
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177572