Abstract
Stimuli at attended-to locations in visual space are usually detected with higher speed and accuracy than stimuli at unattended positions. It has been argued that this effect is due to “sensory gating” mechanisms that modulate the flow of perceptual information from attended and unattended positions. In the present experiments, event-related potentials (E32Ps) were recorded to stimuli that were preceded either by a valid or by an invalid positional cue (trial-by-trial cuing). When overt responses were required only to infrequent target stimuli in valid trials (Experiment 2) or to all validly cued stimuli (Experiment 2B), but not to invalid trials, systematic enhancements of early sensory-evoked potentials were found. These effects were smaller when both validly and invalidly cued stimuli required a response (Experiment 2A). These findings are interpreted as evidence that sensory gating processes are activated during the trial-by-trial suing of spatial attention. Furthermore, valid stimuli elicited a greater negativity than invalid stimuli at midline electrodes following the early enhancements of sensory-evoked potentials. This possibly reflects an additional enhanced processing of attended-to locations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bashinski, H. S., &Bacharach, V. R. (1980) Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations.Perception &. Psychophysics,28, 241–248.
Downing, C. J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention. Effects on perceptual quality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Hu man Perception & Performance,14, 188–202.
Eason, R. G. (1981). Visual evoked potential correlates of early neural filtering during selective attention.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,18, 203–206.
Etmer, M. (1993a). Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs tn a Go/Nogo task.Biological Psychology.35, 123–13.
Eimer, M. (1993b). Spatial cueing, sensory gating, and selective response preparation. An ERP study on visuo-spatia] orienting.Electro-encephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,88, 408–420.
Harter, M. R., Aine, C., &Schroeder, C. (1982). Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type: Effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials.Neuropsychology,20, 421–438.
Harter.M. R., Miller, S. L., Price, N J., Lalonde, M. E., &Keyes, A. L. (1989) Neural processes involved in directing attention.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1. 223–237.
Hawkins, H. L., Hillyard, S. A., Luck, S. J., Mouloua, M., Downing, C. J., &Woodward, D. P. (1990). Visual attention modulates signal detectability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 802–811.
Hillyard, S. A., &Mangun, G. R. (1987). Sensory gating as a physiological mechanism for visual selective attention. In R. Johnson, Jr., J. W. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.),Current trends in event-related potential research (pp. 61–67). New York: Elsevier.
Hillyard, S. A., &Münte, T. F. (1984). Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 185–198.
Hillyard, S. A., Münte, T. F., &Neville, H. J. (1985). Visual-spatial attention, orienting and brain physiology. In M. I. Posner & O. S. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI: Mechanisms of attention (pp. 63–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mangun, G. R., Hansen, J. C., &Hillyard, S. A. (1987). The spatial orienting of attention: Sensory facilitation or response bias? In R. Johnson, Jr., J. W. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.),Current trends in event-related potential research (pp. 118–124). New York: Elsevier.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S.A. (1988). Spatial gradients of visual attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,70, 417–428.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S.A. (1990a). Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: Tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 532–550.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1990b). Electrophysiological studies of visual selective attention in humans. In A. Scheibel & A. Wechsler (Eds.),The neurobiological foundations of higher cognitive function (pp. 271–294). New York: Guilford.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 1057–1074.
Müller, H. J., &Findlay, J. M. (1987). Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cueing of visual attention.Perception & Psycho physics,42, 383–399.
Müller, H. J., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 315–330.
Neville, H. J., &Lawson, D. (1987). Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: An event-related potential and behavioral study: I. Normal hearing adults.Brain Research,405, 253–267.
Posner, M.I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick & E. J. Saltzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rugg, M. D., Milner, A. D., Lines, C. R., &Phalp, R. (1987). Modulation of visual event-related potentials by spatial and non-spatial visual selective attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 85–96.
Sperling, G. (1984). A unified theory of attention and signal detection. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 103–181). Orlando, FL: Academic Press,
Wuers, A. A. (1989).Visual selective attention: An electrophysiological approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Max Planck institute for Psychological Research and by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ei 266/2-1).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eimer, M. “Sensory gating” as a mechanism for visuospatial orienting: Electrophysiological evidence from trial-by-trial cuing experiments. Perception & Psychophysics 55, 667–675 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211681
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211681