Abstract
Illusion-decrement and transfer-of-illusion-decrement procedures were used to examine the contribution of the obtuse- and acute-angle components of the Poggendorff pattern to the standard Poggendorff illusion. In the first four experiments, subjects were required to scan between the oblique lines of the Poggendorff pattern during the inspection phase of the decrement procedure. However, because of a possible confound associated with this procedure, a different decrement technique was used in Experiment 5. The results of Experiment 5 confirm and extend MacKay and Newbigging’s (1977) finding that similar amounts of transfer to the standard pattern are obtained from the obtuse- and acute-angle patterns as from the standard pattern itself: In showing that the acute- and obtuse-angle components both contribute to the illusion, these findings question the plausibility of those theories of the Poggendorff illusion which do not assign any significant role to the acute-angle component. Furthermore, the potential confound associated with the decrement procedure of Experiments 1–4 suggests that the results of other studies obtained with similar procedures need to be reevaluated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Beckett, P. A. (1969). Illusion decrement and transfer of illusion decrement in real- and subjective-contour Poggendorff figures.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 550–556.
Cameron, E. H., &Steele, W. M. (1905). The Poggendorff illusion.Psychological Review Monograph Supplement,7 (1, Whole No. 29). 83–111.
Coren, S., &Girgus, J. S. (1972). Dlusion decrement in intersecting line figures.Psychonomic Science,26, 108–110.
Day, R. H. (1973). The Poggendorff Ulusion with obtuse and acute angles.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 590–596.
Day, R. H., &Dickinson, R. G. (1976). The components of the Poggendorff illusion.British Journal of Psychology,67, 537–552.
Day, R. H., Jolly, W. J., &Duffy, F. M. (1987). No evidence for apparent extent between parallels as the basis of the Poggendorff effect.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 561–568.
Finlay, D. C., &Caelu, T. M. (1975). The Poggendorff illusion and estimates of transverse extent.Perceptual & Motor Skills,41, 142–148.
Greist-Bousquet, S., &Schiffman, H. R. (1981a). The many illusions of the Mueller-Lyer: Comparisons of the wings-in and wingsout illusions and manipulations of standard and dot forms.Perception,10, 147–154.
Greist-Bousquet, S., &Schiffman, H. R. (1981b). The Poggendorff illusion: An illusion of linear extent?Perception,10, 155–164.
Greist-Bousquet, S., &Schiffman, H. R. (1981C). The role of structural components in the Mueller-Lyer illusionPerception & Psychophysics,30, 505–511.
Greist-Bousquet, S., &Schiffman, H. R. (1985) Poggendorff and Mueller-Lyer illusions: Common effects.Perception,14, 427–447.
Greist-Bousquet, S., &Schiffman, H. R. (1987) A note on enhancing the Poggendorff illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 202–203
Greist-Bousquet, S., Schiffman, H. R., Dorsett, D., &Davis, J. (1989). The relation between apparent extent and alignment in the Poggendorff illusion: A response to “No evidence for apparent extent between parallels as the basis of the Poggendorff effect”, by Day, Jolly, and Duffy.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 501–504.
Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions.Psychological Review,6, 241–261.
Mackay, D. C., &Newbigging, P. L. (1977). The Poggendorff and its variants do arouse the same perceptual process.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 26–32.
Porac, C. (1989). Is visual Ulusion decrement based on selective adaptation?Perception & Psychophysics,46, 279–283.
Porac, C., &Coren, S. (1985). Transfer of illusion decrement The effects of global versus local figurai variationsPerception & Psychophysics,37, 515–522.
Pressey, A. W. (1971). An extension of assimilation theory to illusions of size, area, and directionPerception &. Psychophysics,9, 172–176
Pressey, A. W., &Sweeney, O. (1969). A variation of the Poggendorff illusion.Perceptual & Motor Skills,28, 883–886.
Quina-Holland, K. (1977). Spatial distortions within the Poggendorff figure and its variantsA parametric analysis Perception & Psychophysics,21, 118–124.
Trueman, M. T., &Wilson, A. E. (1989). Examination of apparent extent as an explanation of the Poggendorff effectPerception & Psychophysics,45, 494–500.
Warren, R. M., &Bashford, J. A. (1977). Mueller-Lyer illusions: Their origin in processes facilitating object recognitionPerception,6, 615–626
Wenderoth, P., &Johnson, M. (1981). Are die obtuse angles the key components of the Poggendorff illusion?Perception,10, 165–172.
Wenderoth, P., &O’connor, T. (1987). Matching gaps between misaligned pointers demonstrates that lines, both transversal and parallel, enhancePoggendorff illusions Perception & Psychophysics,41, 165–172
Wilson, A. E., &Pressey, A. W. (1976). The role of apparent distance in die Poggendorff illusionPerception & Psychophysics,20, 309–316
Zanuttini, L. (1976). A new explanation for die Poggendorff illusionPerception & Psychophysics,20, 29–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Predebon, J. Illusion decrement and transfer of illusion decrement in obtuse- and acute-angle variants of the Poggendorff illusion. Perception & Psychophysics 48, 467–476 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211591
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211591