Abstract
The serial pattern found for conjunction visual-search tasks has been attributed to covert attentional shifts, even though the possible contributions of target location have not been considered. To investigate the effect of target location on orientation × color conjunction searches, the target’s duration and its position in the display were manipulated. The display was present either until observers responded (Experiment 1), for 104 msec (Experiment 2), or for 62 msec (Experiment 3). Target eccentricity critically affected performance: A pronounced eccentricity effect was very similar for all three experiments; as eccentricity increased, reaction times and errors increased gradually. Furthermore, the set-size effect became more pronounced as target eccentricity increased, and the extent of the eccentricity effect increased for larger set sizes. In addition, according to stepwise regressions, target eccentricity as well as its interaction with set size were good predictors of performance. We suggest that these findings could be explained by spatial-resolution and lateral-inhibition factors. The serial self-terminating hypothesis for orientation × color conjunction searches was evaluated and rejected. We compared the eccentricity effect as well as the extent of the orientation asymmetry in these three conjunction experiments with those found in feature experiments (Carrasco & Katz, 1992). The roles of eye movements, spatial resolution, and covert attention in the eccentricity effect, as well as their implications, are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andersen, G. J. (1990). Focused attention in three-dimensional space.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 112–120.
Andersen, G. J., &Kramer, A. F. (1993). Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 658–667.
Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The oblique effect in man and animals.Psychological Bulletin,78, 266–278.
Bacon, W., &Egeth, H. (1991). Local processes in preattentive feature detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 77–90.
Banks, W. P., &Prinzmetal, W. (1976). Configurational effects in visual information processing.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 361–367.
Bergen, J. R., &Julesz, B. (1983, June 23). Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination.Nature,303, 696–698.
Biederman, I., &Cooper, E. E. (1991). Object recognition and laterality null effects.Neuropsychologia,29, 685–694.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bundesen, C., &Pedersen, L. F. (1983). Color segregation and visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 487–493.
Campbell, F. W., Kulikowski, J. J., &Levinson, J. (1966). The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings.Journal of Physiology,187, 427–436.
Cannon, M. W., Jr. (1985). Perceived contrast in the fovea and periphery.Journal of the Optical Society of America,2, 1760–1768.
Carrasco, M., &Katz, S. M. (1992). Exploring feature asymmetries in visual search: Effects of target position and presentation time.Proceedings & Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association,63, 25.
Carrasco, M., Katz, S. M., &Chang, I. (1993). Spatial resolution versus covert attention: Position effects on visual search tasks [Abstract].Perception,22 (Suppl.), 69.
Cavanagh, P., Arguin, M., &Treisman, A. (1990). Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 479–491.
Cheal, M. L., &Lyon, D. R. (1989). Attention effects on form discrimination at different eccentricities.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 719–746.
Cheal, M., &Lyon, D. R. (1992). Attention in visual search: Multiple search classes.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 113–138.
Chmiel, N. (1989). Response effects in the perception of conjunctions of colour and form.Psychological Research,51, 117–122.
Cohen, A. (1993). Asymmetries in visual search for conjunctive targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 775–797.
Crick, F. (1984). Function of the thalamic reticular complex: The searchlight hypothesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,81, 4586–4590.
DeValois, R. L., &DeValois, K. K. (1988).Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
Donnelly, N., Humphreys, G. W., &Riddoch, M. J. (1991). Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 561–570.
Downing, C. J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 188–202.
Downing, C. J., &Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Martin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 171–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 578–588.
Efron, R., Yund, E. W., &Nichols, D. R. (1987). Scanning the visual field without eye movements—a sex difference.Neuropsychologia,25, 637–644.
Efron, R., Yund, E. W., &Nichols, D. R. (1990a). Detectability as a function of target location: Effects of spatial configuration.Brain & Cognition,12, 102–116.
Efron, R., Yund, E. W., &Nichols, D. R. (1990b). Serial processing of visual spatial patterns in a search paradigm.Brain & Cognition,12, 17–41.
Efron, R., Yund, E. W., &Nichols, D. R. (1990c). Visual detectability gradients: The effect of distractors in contralateral field.Brain & Cognition,12, 128–143.
Egeth, H., &Dagenbach, D. (1991). Parallel vs. serial processing in visual search: Further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 551–560.
Egeth, H. J., Folk, C. L., &Mullen, P. A. (1989). Spatial parallelism in the processing of lines, letters, and lexicality. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.),Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 19–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Egeth, H. J., Virzi, R. A., &Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 32–39.
Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (1990a, February 9). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search.Science,247, 721–723.
Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (1990b). Sensitivity to three-dimensional orientation in visual search.Psychological Science,1, 323–326.
Eriksen, C. W. (1990). Attentional search of the visual field. In D. Brogan (Ed.),Visual search (pp. 3–19). London: Taylor & Francis.
Eriksen, C. W., &Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 299–305.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Eriksen, C. W., &Schultz, D. W. (1977). Retinal locus and acuity in visual information processing.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,9, 81–84.
Eriksen, C. W., &Webb, J. M. (1989). Shifting of attentional focus within and about a visual display.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 175–183.
Eriksen, C. W., &Yeh, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 583–597.
Estes, W. K., &Wolford, G. L. (1971). Effects of spaces on report from tachistoscopically presented letter strings.Psychonomic Science,25, 77–80.
Farmer, E. W., &Taylor, R. M. (1980). Visual search through color displays: Effects of target-background similarity and background uniformity.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 267–272.
Fischer, B., &Ramsperger, E. (1984). Human express saccades: Extremely short reaction times of goal directed eye movements.Experimental Brain Research,57, 191–195.
Fischer, B., &Weber, E. (1993). Express saccades and visual attention.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,16, 553–610.
Graham, N. (1981). Psychophysics of spatial-frequency channels. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 1–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Heron, W. (1957). Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention.American Journal of Psychology,70, 38–48.
Humphreys, G. W., &Müller, H. J. (1993). Search via recursive rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search.Cognitive Psychology,25, 43–110.
Humphreys, G. W., Quinlan, P. T., &Riddoch, M. J. (1989). Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 258–279.
Hurlbert, A., &Poggio, T. (1985). Spotlight on attention.Trends in Neuroscience,8, 309–311.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Julesz, B., &Bergen, J. R. (1983). Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures.Bell System Technical Journal,62, 1619–1645.
Kinchla, R. A. (1992). Attention.Annual Review of Psychology,43, 711–742.
Klein, R., &Farrell, M. (1989). Search performance without eye movements.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 476–482.
Kramer, A. F., &Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 267–284.
Kumar, S. (1994).Visual search for two dimensional and three dimensional stimuli. Unpublished master’s thesis. Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT.
LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters in words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 371–379.
Lefton, L. A., &Haber, R. N. (1974). Information extraction from different retinal locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 975–980.
Livingstone, M., &Hubel, D. (1988, May 6). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception.Science,240, 740–749.
Mansfield, R. (1974, December 20). Neural basis of orientation perception in primate vision.Science,186, 1133–1135.
Mayfrank, L., Kimmig, H., &Fischer, B. (1987). The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided saccadic eye movements in man. In J. K. O’Regan & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.),Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 37–45). New York: Elsevier, North-Holland.
McLeod, P., Driver, J., &Crisp, J. (1988). Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel.Nature,332, 154–155.
Mishkin, M., &Forgays, D. G. (1952). Word recognition as a function of retinal locus.Journal of Experimental Psychology,43, 43–48.
Moraglia, G. (1989a). Display organization and the detection of horizontal line segments.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 265–272.
Moraglia, G. (1989b). Visual search: Spatial frequency and orientation.Perceptual & Motor Skills,69, 675–689.
Murphy, T. D., &Eriksen, C. W. (1987). Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 576–586.
Nakayama, K., &Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions.Nature,320, 264–265.
Ostrovsky-Solis, F., Efron, R., &Yund, E. W. (1991). Visual detectability gradients: Effect of illiteracy.Brain & Cognition,17, 42–51.
Pashler, H. (1987a). Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 191–201.
Pashler, H. (1987b). Target-distractor discriminability in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 285–292.
Pashler, H., &Badgio, P. C. (1985). Visual attention and stimulus identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 105–121.
Poisson, M. E., &Wilkinson, F. (1992). Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual conjunction search.Perception,21, 21–38.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Previc, F. H. (1990). Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,13, 519–575.
Prinzmetal, W., Presti, D. E., &Posner, M. I. (1986). Does attention affect visual feature integration?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 361–369.
Quinlan, P. T., &Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 455–472.
Rijsdijk, J. P., Kroon, J. N., &van der Wilt, G. J. (1980). Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina.Vision Research,20, 235–241.
Saarinen, J., &Julesz, B. (1991). The speed of attentional shifts in the visual field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science,88, 1812–1814.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1987). Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences.Spatial Vision,2, 39–49.
Savel, T. G. (1991).Effects of isoluminance and other variables on visual search tasks. Unpublished honors thesis, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT.
Shulman, G. L., Sheehy, J. B., &Wilson, J. (1986). Gradients of spatial attention.Acta Psychologica,61, 167–181.
Shulman, G. L., &Wilson, J. (1987). Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information.Perception,16, 89–101.
Steinman, S. B. (1987). Serial and parallel search in pattern vision?Perception,16, 389–398.
Townsend, J. T. (1972). Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,25, 168–199.
Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished.Psychological Science,1, 46–54.
Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 194–214.
Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processes in vision. In Z. W. Pylyshyn (Ed.),Computational processes in human vision: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 341–369). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Treisman, A. (1986). Features and objects in visual processing. In I. Rock (Ed.),The perceptual world (pp. 97–110). New York: Freeman.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.
Treisman, A. (1990). Variations on the theme of feature integration: Reply to Navon (1990).Psychological Review,97, 460–463.
Treisman, A. (1991). Search, similarity, and integration of features be tween and within dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 652–676.
Treisman, A. (1993). The perception of features and objects. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),Attention: Selection, awareness, and control (pp. 5–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Treisman, A., Cavanagh, P., Fischer, B., Ramachandran, V. S., &von der Heydt, R. (1990). Form perception and attention: Striate cortex and beyond. In L. Spillman & J. S. Werner (Eds.),Visual perception neurophysiological foundations (pp. 273–316). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Treisman, A., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Treisman, A., &Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 285–310.
Ward, R., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 664–672.
Wolfe, J. M. (1992). The parallel guidance of visual attention.Current Directions in Psychological Science,1, 124–128.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Wolfe, J. M., &Cave, K. R. (1990). Deploying visual attention: The guided search model. In A. Blake & T. Troschianko (Eds.),AI and the eye (pp. 80–103). Chichester, MA: Wiley.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Wolfe, J. M., Yu, K. P., Stewart, M. I., Shorter, A. D., &Cave, K. R. (1990). Limitations on the parallel guidance of visual search: Color × color and orientation × orientation conjunctions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 879–892.
Wolford, G. (1975). Perturbation model for letter identification.Psychological Review,82, 184–199.
Wolford, G., &Shum, K. H. (1980). Evidence for feature perturbations.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 409–420.
Yund, E. W., Efron, R., &Nichols, D. R. (1990a). Detectability as a function of spatial location: Effects of selective attention.Brain & Cognition,12, 42–54.
Yund, E. W., Efron, R., &Nichols, D. R. (1990b). Detectability gradients as a function of target location.Brain & Cognition,12, 1–16.
Yund, E. W., Efron, R., &Nichols, D. R. (1990c). Target detection in one visual field in the presence or absence of stimuli in the contralateral field by right- and left-handed subjects.Brain & Cognition,12, 117–127.
Zelinsky, G. J. (1994).Eye movements during parallel/serial search tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Zelinsky, G. J., Sheinberg, D. L., &Bulthoff, H. H. (1993). Eye movements during visual search.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,34, 1236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (NYI Grant SBR-9357986), by an AAUW American Fellowship to M.C., and by Ford summer grants to I.C. and S.M.K. Parts of this study were presented at the 32nd meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November 1991, and at the 16th European Conference on Visual Perception, August 1993.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carrasco, M., Evert, D.L., Chang, I. et al. The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 1241–1261 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208380
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208380