Abstract
We investigated how both objective and subjective organizations affect perceptual organization and how this perceptual organization, in turn, influences observers’ performance in a localization search task. Two groups of observers viewing exactly the same stimuli (objective organization) performed in significantly different ways, depending on how they were induced to parse the display (subjective organization). In Experiments 1 and 2, the observers were asked to describe the location of a tilted target among a varying number of vertical or horizontal distractors. Subjective organization was induced by instructing observers to parse the display into either three horizontal regions (rows) or three vertical regions (columns). The position of the target was critical: location performance, as assessed by reaction time and errors, was consistently impaired at the locations adjacent to the boundaries defining the regions, producing what we refer to as thesubjective boundary effect. Furthermore, the extent of this effect depended on whether the stimulus-driven and conceptually driven information concurred or conflicted. This made location information more or less accessible. In Experiment 1, the strength of objective grouping was a function of the proximity of the items (near or far conditions) and their orientation in a 6×6 matrix. In Experiment 2, the strength of objective grouping was a function of similarity of color (items were color coded by rows or by columns) and the orientation of the items in a 9×9 matrix. The subjective boundary effect was more pronounced when the display promoted grouping in the direction orthogonal to that of the task (e.g., when observers parsed by rows but vertical distractors were closer together [Experiment 1] or color coded [Experiment 2] to induce global columns). In contrast, this effect decreased when the direction of both objective and subjective organizations was parallel (e.g., when observers parsed by rows and horizontal distractors were closer together [Experiment 1] or were color coded [Experiment 2] to induce global rows). A localization search task proved to be an ideal forum in which objective and subjective organizations interacted. We discuss how these results indicated that observers’ performance in a localization task was determined by the interaction of objective and subjective organizations, and that the resulting perceptual organization constrained coarse location information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, J., &Braddick, O. J. (1989). ‘Where’ and ‘what’ in visual search.Perception,18, 181–189.
Attneave, F. (1971, December). Multistability in perception.Scientific American,225, 62–71.
Banks, W. P., &Prinzmetal, W. (1976). Configurational effects in visual information processing.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 361–367.
Barchilon Ben-Av, M., Sagi, D., &Braun, J. (1992). Visual attention and perceptual grouping.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 277–294.
Baylis, G.C., &Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 451–470.
Beck, J. (1966). Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping.Perception & Psychophysics,1, 300–302.
Beck, J. (1967). Perceptual grouping produced by line figures.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 491–495.
Beck, J. (1982). Textural segmentation. In J. Beck (Ed.),Organization and representation in perception (pp. 285–318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bergen, J. R., &Julesz, B. (1983, June 23). Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination.Nature,303, 696–698.
Bravo, M.J., &Blake, R. (1990). Preattentive vision and perceptual groups.Perception,19, 515–522.
Bundesen, C., &Pedersen, L. F. (1983). Color segregation and visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 487–493.
Carrasco, M., Evert, D. L., Chang, I., &Katz, S. M. (1995). The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1241–1261.
Carrasco, M., &Girard, D. D. (1993). On identification and location in visual search.Proceedings & Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association,64, 29.
Carrasco, M., Katz, S. M. (1992). Feature asymmetries in visual search: Effects of display duration and target position.Proceedings and Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association,63, 25.
Cohen, A., &Ivry, R. B. (1989). Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 650–663.
Cohen, A., &Ivry, R. B. (1991). Density effects in conjunction search: Evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 891–901.
Collins, J. F., &Eriksen, C. W. (1967). The perception of multiple simultaneously presented forms as a function of foveal spacing.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 369–373.
Coren, S., &Girgus, J. S. (1980). Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: The Gestalt illusions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 404–412.
Curcio, C. A., Sloan, K. R., Packer, O., Hendrickson, A. E., &Kalina, R. E. (1987, May 1). Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: Individual variability and radial asymmetry.Science,236, 579–582.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 501–517.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 578–588.
Egeth, H. E., Folk, C. L., &Mullin, P. A. (1989). Spatial parallelism in the processing of lines, letters, and lexicality. In B. E. Shep & S. Ballesteros (Eds.),Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 19–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (1990, February 9). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search.Science,247, 721–723.
Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (1991). VSearch color: Full-color visual search experiments on the Macintosh II.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,23, 265–272.
Eriksen, C. W. (1952). Location of objects in a visual display as a function of the number of dimensions on which the objects differ.Journal of Experimental Psychology,44, 56–60.
Eriksen, C. W. (1953). Object location in a complex perceptual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology,45, 126–132.
Eriksen, C. W., &Rohrbaugh, J. W. (1970). Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention.American Journal of Psychology,83, 330–343.
Estes, W. K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 278–286.
Estes, W. K., &Wolford, G. L. (1971). Effects of spaces on report from tachistoscopically presented letter strings.Psychonomic Science,25, 77–80.
Farmer, E.W., &Taylor, R. M. (1980). Visual search through color displays: Effects of target-background similarity and background uniformity.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 267–272.
Ginsburg, A. P. (1984). Visual form perception based on biological filtering. In L. Spillman & B. R. Wooten (Eds.),Sensory experience, adaptation and perception (pp. 53–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ginsburg, A. P. (1986). Spatial filtering and visual form perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 34.1–34.41). New York: Wiley.
Green, M. (1992). Visual search: Detection, identification, and localization.Perception,21, 765–777.
Hitt, W. D. (1961). An evaluation of five different abstract coding methods: Experiment IV.Human Factors,3, 120–130.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. (1979, September). Brain mechanisms of vision.Scientific American,241, 150–162.
Humphreys, G. W., Quinlan, P. T., &Riddoch, M. J. (1989). Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 258–279.
Ivry, R. B., &Prinzmetal, W. (1991). Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 105–116.
Johnston, J. C., &Pashler, H. (1990). Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 843–856.
Julesz, B. (1980). Spatial nonlinearities in the instantaneous perception of textures with identical power spectra.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,290, 83–94.
Kahneman, D., &Henik, A. (1977). Effects of visual grouping on immediate recall and selective attention. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 307–322). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kahneman, D., &Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 181–211). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Keele, S., Cohen, A., Ivry, R., Liotti, M., &Yee, P. (1988). Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 444–452.
Kinchla, R. A. (1977). The role of structural redundancy in the perception of visual targets.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 19–30.
Koffka, K. (1935).Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
McLeod, P., Driver, J., &Crisp, J. (1988). Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel.Nature,332, 154–155.
Nakayama, K., &Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions.Nature,320, 264–265.
Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Nissen, M. J. (1985). Accessing features and objects: Is location special? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 204–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Palmer, S., &Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 29–55.
Peterson, M. A., &Gibson, B. S. (1991). Directing spatial attention within an object: Altering the functional equivalence of shape descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 170–182.
Peterson, M. A., &Hochberg, J. (1983). Opposed set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 183–193.
Poisson, M. E., &Wilkinson, F. (1992). Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual conjunction search.Perception,21, 21–38.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1981). Perceptual organization in information processing. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 141–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pomerantz, J. R., &Schwaitzberg, S. D. (1975). Grouping by proximity: Selective attention measures.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 355–361.
Prinzmetal, W. (1981). Principles of feature integration in visual perception.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 330–340.
Prinzmetal, W., &Banks, W. P. (1977). Good continuation affects visual detection.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 389–395.
Prinzmetal, W., &Keysar, B. (1989). Functional theory of illusory conjunctions and neon colors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 165–190.
Quinlan, P. T., &Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 455–472.
Rensink, R. A., &Enns, J. T. (1992).Vscope and Emaker [Software manual]. Vancouver, BC: Micropsych Software.
Rijsdijk, J. P., Kroon, J. N., &van der Wilt, G. L. (1980). Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina.Vision Research,20, 235–241.
Sagi, D. (1990). Detection of orientation singularity in Gabor textures: Effect of signal density and spatial frequency.Vision Research,30, 1377–1388.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1985a). Detection versus discrimination of visual orientation.Perception,14, 619–628.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1985b, June 7). “Where” and “what” in vision.Science,228, 1217–1219.
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief presentations.Psychological Monographs,74(11, Whole No. 498).
Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 194–214.
Treisman, A. (1993). The perception of features and objects. In A. [D.] Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),Attention: Selection, awareness, and control (pp. 5–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Treisman, A., &Schmidt, N. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects.Cognitive Psychology,14, 107–141.
Tsal, Y. (1983). On interpreting the effects of location preknowledge: A critique of Duncan.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 297–298.
van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1993). The role of position in object selection in vision.Psychological Research,56, 44–58.
Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt.Psychologische Forschung,4, 301–350. [Reprinted in part in W.D. Ellis (Ed.), A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71–88). New York: Humanities Press, 1950.]
Wolfe, J. M. (1992). The parallel guidance of visual attention.Current Directions in Psychological Science,1, 124–128.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Wolford, G. (1975). Perturbation model for letter identification.Psychological Review,82, 184–199.
Wolford, G., &Shum, K. H. (1980). Evidence for feature perturbations.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 409–420.
Yantis, S. (1992). Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization.Cognitive Psychology,24, 295–340.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NYI Grant SBR-9357986) to M.C. I.C. was a Ford Foundation Fellow at Wesleyan University (Summer 1993).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carrasco, M., Chang, I. The interaction of objective and subjective organizations in a localization search task. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 1134–1150 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208370
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208370