Abstract
Previous studies have shown that individuals may attend to different dimensions in making an overall judgment of similarity between complex stimuli. The present study investigated the nature of differences in the perceived similarity of reproductions of paintings by the use of multidimensional scaling techniques. Using the INDSCAL model, a group of art-trained students are shown to differ significantly from a group of nonart students in terms of their differential weighing of a set of common dimensions. The same subjects’ preferences are examined in relation to these differences by use of the PREFMAP hierarchy of models. While the simplest (vector) model was found to be appropriate for almost all subjects, large differences in vector direction and average subject ideal-point location are found. Implications for future studies of responses to art are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Berlyne, D. E. Interrelations of verbal and nonverbal measures used in experimental aesthetics.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1973,14, 177–184.
Berlyne, D. E. Dimensions of perception of exotic and prerenaissance paintings.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1975.29. 151–173.
Berlyne, D. E., &Ogilvie, J. C. Dimensions of perception of paintings. In D. E. Berlyne (Ed.),Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. Washington: Hemisphere, 1974.
Bush, L. Individual differences multidimensional scaling of adjectives denoting feelings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973,25, 50–57.
Carroll, J. D. Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.),Multidimensional scaling. New York: Seminar Press, 1972.
Carroll, J. D., &Chang, J. J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of Eckart-Young" decomposition.Psychometrika, 1970,35, 285–319.
Carroll, J. D., &Wish, M. Mcdels and methods tor three-way multidimensional scaling. In D. Krantz, R. Atkinson, R. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. II). San Francisco: Freeman, 1974.
Chapman, A. J., &Williams, A. R. Prestige effects and aesthetic experiences: Adolescents’ reactions to music.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1976,15, 61–72.
Child, I. L. Personality correlates of aesthetic judgment in college students.Journal of Personality, 1965,33, 476–511.
Child, I. L. Esthetics.Annual Review of Psychology, 1972,23, 669–694.
Coombs, C. H.A theory of data. New York: Wiley, 1964.
Coxon, A. P. M., &Jones, C. L. Occupational similarities: Subjective aspects of social stratification.Quality and Quantity, 1974,8, 139–157.
Eisenmann, R., &Boss, E. Complexity-simplicity and persuasibility.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970,31, 651–656.
Gardner, H. Style sensitivity in children.Human Development, 1972,15, 325–338.
Green, P. E., &Carmone, R. J.Multidimensional scaling and related techniques in marketing analysis. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1970.
Green, P. E., &Rao, V. R.Applied multidimensional scaling: A comparison of approaches and algorithms. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1972.
Helm, C. E., &Tucker, L. R. Individual differences in the structure of color-perception.American Journal of Psychology, 1962,75, 437–444.
Howard, J. H., &Silverman, E. B. A multidimensional scaling analysis of 16 complex sounds.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 193–200.
Isaac, P. D. Dissimilarities as indices of individual perceptual structure.Perception & Psychophysics, 1970,7, 229–233.
Jones, L. E., &Young, F. Structure of a social environment: Longitudinal individual differences scaling of an intact group.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,24, 108–121.
Klein, S. P. Using points of view and multidimensional scaling analyses to describe esthetic judgements.Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention A. P. A., 1968, 447–448.
Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness-of-fit to a nonmetric hypothesisPsychometrika, 1964,29, 1–27.
Landis, D., Silver, C. A., Jones, J. M., &Messick, S. Level of proficiency and multidimensional viewpoints about problem similarity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967,51, 216–222.
Linde, L. Similarity of poetic rhythms with different amounts of semantic content—stress ratings and pairwise similarity ratings.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1975,16, 240–246.
Machotka, P. Visual aesthetics and learning.Journal of Aesthetic Education, 1970,4, 117–130.
Mardia, K. V.Statistics of directional data. London: Academic Press, 1972.
Mueller, W. S. Cognitive complexity and salience of dimensions in person perception.Australian Journal of Psychology, 1974,26, 173–182.
O’hare, D. P. A., &Gordon, I. E. An application of repertory grid technique to aesthetic measurement.Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1976,42, 1183–1192. (a)
O’hare, D. P. A., & Gordon, I. E. Dimensions of the perception of art— verbal scales and similarity judgements.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1976, in press, (b)
Rosenberg, S., &Kim, M. P. The method of sorting as a datagathering procedure in multivariate research.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1975,10, 489–502.
Rosenbluh, E. S., Owens, G. B., &Pohler, M. J. Art preference and personality.British Journal of Psychology, 1972,63, 441–443.
Ross, R. Optimum orders for the presentation of pairs in the method of paired comparisons.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1934.25, 375–382.
Ruth, J., &Kolehmainen, K. Classification of art into style periods: A factor analytic approach.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1974,15, 322–327.
Schiffman, S., &Dackis, C. Taste of nutrients: Amino acids, vitamins, and fatty acids.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,17, 140–146.
Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 125–139.
Shepard, R. N. Introduction. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.),Multidimensional scaling. New York: Seminar Press. 1972.
Silver, C. A., Landis, D., &Messick, S. Multidimensional analysis of visual form: An analysis of individual differences.American Journal of Psychology, 1966,79, 62–72.
Silverman, J., Winner, E., Rosensteil, A. K., &Gardner, H. On training sensitivity to painting styles.Perception, 1975,4, 373–384.
Skager, R. W., Schultz, C., &Klein, S. The multidimensional scaling of a set of artistic drawings: Perceived structure and scale correlates.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1966,1, 425–436.
Stalling, R. B., &Tiller, J. Modifying a response class of artistic taste with signal light reinforcers.Psychological Record, 1975,25, 65–69.
Steck, L., &Machotka, P. Preference for musical complexity: Effects of context.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,104, 170–174.
Stewart, T. R. Generality of multidimensional representations.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1974,9, 507–519.
Swartz, P., &Hewitt, D. Lateral organisation in pictures and aesthetic preference.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970,30, 991–1007.
Wainer, H., &Kaye, K. Multidimensional scaling of concept learning in an introductory course.Journal of Education Psychology, 1974,66, 591–598.
Wish, M., Deutsch, M., &Biener, L. Differences in conceptual structures of nations: An exploratory study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970,16, 361–373.
Zusne, L.Visual perception of form. London: Academic Press, 1970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’hare, D. Individual differences in perceived similarity and preference for visual art: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 20, 445–452 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208280
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208280