Abstract
Three experiments were conducted to determine whether inhibition of return can be best characterized as an attentional or a motor phenomenon. In the first experiment, subjects made choice key-press responses to the location of a target (left or right) or the identity of the target (X or +) by pressing a left or right response key. In the second experiment, the display was rotated 90° so that there was no direct spatial mapping between the vertically aligned stimulus display and the horizontally aligned response keys. In both experiments, inhibition of return was observed for location-based and identity-based choice responses, although more inhibition was seen in the identity-based responses. The results of the third experiment suggested that this larger inhibitory effect may be specific to the covert orienting of reflexive attention in response to the sudden appearance of a single peripheral stimulus in the identity tasks. Overall, the results are consistent with the attentional, not the motor, explanation of inhibition of return.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrams, R. A., &Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 467–477.
Gibson, B. S., &Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 323–339.
Klein, R., &Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). New York: Academic Press.
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maylor, E. A., &Hockey, R. (1987). Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space.Neuropsychologia,25, 41–54.
Müller, H. J., &Von Mühlenen, A. (1996). Attentional tracking and inhibition of re turn in dynamic displays.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 224–249.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I.,&Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pratt, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 117–120.
Pratt, J., &Abrams, R. A. (1995). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1343–1353.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jha, A. P., &Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 367–378.
Terry, K. M., Valdes, L. A., &Neill, W. T. (1994). Does “inhibition of return” occur in discrimination tasks?Perception & Psychophysics,55, 279–286.
Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., &Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 289–298.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., &Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 478–499.
Vaughan, J. (1984). Saccades directed atpreviously attended locations in space. In A. G. Gale & E Johnson (Eds.),Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 143–150). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2, 156–161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERCC) awards 52-75095 and 52–77162, as well as University of Alberta award 51-61019, to A.K. The research was also supported by Grant R29-MH45145 from the National Institutes of Health to R. A. Abrams, and we would like to thank him for the allowing us to conduct the third experiment in his laboratory.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pratt, J., Kingstone, A. & Khoe, W. Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 964–971 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205511
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205511