Abstract
We asked subjects to match points on the surface of a smooth three-dimensional (3-D) shape with points on the surface of another object that was geometrically identical to the first object but was placed in a different pose, was differently textured, and was differently shaded. In all cases, the fiducial point was on the rim of one of the objects (i.e., the boundary of the visible region of the surface), whereas the matching point was well within the silhouette of the other object. This allowed us to draw (preliminary) conclusions concerning the way monocular human observers are able to handle the neighborhood of the rim, where the local slant assumes arbitrarily high values. All experiments were done in real space with real objects (no computer-simulated scenes), the points being indicated with laser beam illumination. The subject was given control over the direction of the laser beams and was thus able to perform the task by adjustment from the vantage position. We studied both consistency (whether the subject’s judgments were invariant against changes of relative pose) and veridicality (whether the depth of the visual contour as calculated from the settings agreed with the true distance as measured by mechanical means). Subjects caught much of the 3-D structure of the contour but did deviate appreciably and apparently idiosyncratically from the true geometry.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arnold, V. I. (1984).Catastrophy theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Blaschke, W. (1967).Differential geometry. New York: Chelsea.
Cipolla, R., &Blake, A. (1990). The dynamic analysis of apparent contours. InProceedings of the IEEE Third International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 616–623). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Cortese, J. M., &Andersen, G. J. (1991). Recovery of 3-D shape from deforming contours.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 315–327.
da Vinci, Leonardo (1989).Leonardo on painting (M. Kemp, Ed.; M. Kemp & M. Walker, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Faugeras, O. (1993).Three-dimensional computer vision: A geometric viewpoint. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Giblin, P., &Weiss, R. (1987). Reconstruction of surfaces from profiles. InProceedings of the IEEE First International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 136–144). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Jacobs, T. S. (1988).Light for the artist. New York: Watson-Guptil.
Koenderink, J. J. (1990).Solid shape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Koenderink, J. J., Kappers, A. M. L., Pollick, F. E., &Kawato, M. (1997). Correspondence in pictorial space.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 813–827.
Koenderink, J. J., &van Doorn, A. J. (1976). The singularities of the visual mapping.Biological Cybernetics,24, 51–59.
Koenderink, J. J., &van Doorn, A. J. (1982). The shape of smooth objects and the way contours end.Perception,11, 129–137.
Koenderink, J. J., &van Doorn, A. J. (1984). What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape?Perception,13, 321–330.
Mach, E. (1959).The analysis of sensations and the relation of the physical to the psychical (C. M. Williams, Trans.; rev. by S. Waterlow). New York: Dover. (Original work published in German in 1886)
Marr, D. (1982).Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Norman, J. F., &Todd, J. T. (1994). Perception of rigid motion in depth from the optical deformations of shadows and occlusion boundaries.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 343–356.
Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., &Phillips, F. (1995). The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 629–636.
Phillips, F., Todd, J. T., Koenderink, J. J., &Kappers, A. M. L. (1995). What defines features on smoothly curved surfaces?Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,34, 847.
Pollick, F. E., Giblin, P. J., Rycroft, J., &Wilson, L. L. (1992). Human recovery of shape from profiles.Behaviormetrika,19, 65–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This collaboration was supported by NATO Exchange Grant CRG 920675. J.J.K. and A.M.L.K. were supported by the Human Frontiers Science Program. A.J.v.D. was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). J.T.T. was supported by Air Force Office of Scientific Research Grant F49620-93-1-0116.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koenderink, J.J., Van Doorn, A.J., Kappers, A.M.L. et al. The visual contour in depth. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 828–838 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205501
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205501