Abstract
Two rhesus monkeys were trained to detect cool stimuli (decrements in skin temperature from the adapted temperature) presented to the palm of the left hand after the skin had been preadapted to a 33°C temperature. The procedure was analogous to the signal detection “yes-no” method used with human observers. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated by varying the a priori probability of stimulus oecurrence. The proportion of hits and of false alarms increased with increases in the a priori probability of stimulation. The points of isosensitivity of both subjects for cool intensities of 0.3°C, but not at greater intensities, yielded straight lines with slopes of approximately one when plotted on normal-normal coordinates. The values of the d’s detectability index decreased from 3.52 to 0.75 for one subject and from 2.81 1to 1.28 for the other as the stimulus intensity was decreased from 0.8° to 0.15° cooling from the adapting temperature. Cool thresholds for each subject of 0.19° and 0.12°C were computed from classical psychometric functions when threshold was defined as 50% hits at a 50% probability of stimulus occurrence. These thresholds are comparable to published reports of the cool threshold for the rhesus.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Hurst, C. M., & Lucero, J. R.A collar and chain procedure for handling and seating Macaca mulatta. Technical Report ARL-TR-66-14,651st Aeromedial Research Laboratory, Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, 1966.
References
Blough, D. S. Stimulus generalization as signal detection in pigeons.Science, 1967,155, 940–941.
Boneau, C. A., &Cole, J. L. Decision theory, the pigeon, and the psychophysical function.Psychological Review, 1967,74. 123–135.
Cain, W. S. Spatial discrimination of cutaneous warmth.American Journal of Psychology, 1973,86, 169–182.
Clark, W. C., &Mehl, L. Thermal pain: A sensory decision theory analysis of the effect of age and sex on d’, various response criteria, and 50% pain threshold.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971,78, 202–212.
Clark, W. C., &Mehl, L. Signal detection theory procedures are not equivalent when thermal stimuli are judged.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,97, 148–153.
Cragg, B. G., &Downer, J. De C. Behavioral evidence for cortical involvement in the manual temperature discrimination in monkey.Experimental Neurology, 1967,19, 433–442.
Egan, J. P., &Clarke, F. R. Psychophysics and signal detection. In J. D. Sidowski (Ed.),Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966. Pp. 211–246.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A.Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Krieger, 1974.
Kenshalo, D. R. Psychophysical studies of temperature sensitivity. In W. D. Neff (Ed.),Contributions to sensory physiology. New York: Academic Press, 1970. Pp. 19–74.
Kenshalo, D. R., &Bergen, D. C. A device to measure cutaneous temperature sensitivity in human and subhuman species.Journal of Applied Physiology, 1975,39, 1038–1040.
Kenshalo, D. R., &Hall, E. C. Thermal thresholds of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974,86, 902–910.
Kulics, A. T., Carlson, K. R., &Werner, G. Signal detection of stimulus discrimination in normal and split-brain monkeys.Brain Research, 1974,81, 119–132.
Laursen, A. M. Thermal thresholds in man and monkey.Experimental Neurology, 1972,34, 25–32.
Pastore, R. E., &Scheirer, C. J. Signal detection theory: Considerations for general application.Psychological Bulletin, 1974,81, 945–958.
Porter, L., &Semmes, J. Preservation of cutaneous temperature sensitivity after ablation of sensory cortex in monkeys.Experimental Neurology, 1974,42, 206–219.
Smith, J. C. Conditioned suppression as an animal psychophysical, technique In W. C. Stebbins (Ed.).Animal psychophysics New work: Appleton-Century-Crofts. 1970. Pp 125–159
Stebbins, W. C. (Ed.).Animal psychophysics. New York: Appleton-Century-Crotts, 1970
Stevens, J. C., Marks, L. E., &Simonson, D. C. Regional sensitivity and spatial summation in the warmth sense.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,13 825–836.
Stevens, J. C., Okulicz, W. C., &Marks, L. E. Temporal summation at the warmth threshold.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 307–312.
Terman, M. Discrimination of auditory intensities by rats.Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970,13, 145–160.
Vendrik, A. J. H., &Eijkman, U. E. G. Psychophyical properties determined with internal noise. In D. R. Kenshalo (Ed.).The skin senses. Springfield. III: Thomas. 1968. Pp. 178–192.
Yager, D. &Ducan, I. Signal detection analysis of luminance generalization in goldfish using latency as a graded response measure.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 353–355.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant GB-30610.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Molinari, H.H., Rózsa, A.J. & Kenshalo, D.R. Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) cool sensitivity measured by a signal detection method. Perception & Psychophysics 19, 246–251 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204177
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204177