Abstract
Speech perception can be viewed in terms of the listener’s integration of two sources of information: the acoustic features transduced by the auditory receptor system and the context of the linguistic message. The present research asked how these sources were evaluated and integrated in the identification of synthetic speech. A speech continuum between the glide-vowel syllables /ri/ and /li/ was generated by varying the onset frequency of the third formant. Each sound along the continuum was placed in a consonant-cluster vowel syllable after an initial consonant /p/, /t/, /s/, and /v/. In English, both /r/ and /l/ are phonologically admissible following /p/ but are not admissible following /v/. Only /l/ is admissible following /s/ and only /r/ is admissible following /t/. A third experiment used synthetic consonant-cluster vowel syllables in which the first consonant varied between /b/ and /d and the second consonant varied between /l/ and /r/. Identification of synthetic speech varying in both acoustic featural information and phonological context allowed quantitative tests of various models of how these two sources of information are evaluated and integrated in speech perception.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Broadbent, D. E. Word-frequency effect and response bias.PsychologicaI Review, 1967,74, 1–15.
Brown, R. W., &Hildum, D. C. Expectancy and the perception of syllables.Language, 1956,32, 411–419.
Chandler, J. P. Subroutine STEPIT finds local minima of a smooth function of several parameters.Behavioral Science, 1969,14, 81–82.
Chomsky, N., &Halle, M.The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.
Cohen, M. M., &Massaro, D. W. Real-time speech synthesis.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1976,8, 189–196.
Cole, R. A., &Jakimik, J. Understanding speech: How words are heard. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing. London: Academic Press, 1978.
Cole, R. A., &Scour, B. The phantom in the phoneme: Invariant cues for stop consonants.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 101–107.
Ganong, W. F., III. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 110–125.
Klatt, D. H. Review of the ARPA speech understanding project.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,62, 1345–1366.
Ladefoger, P.A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich, 1975.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M.Perception of the speech code, 1967,74, 431–461.
Marslen-Wilson, W., &Welsh, A. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech.Cognitive Psychology, 1978,10, 29–63.
Massaro, D. W. (Ed.).Understanding language:’ An information processing analysis of speech perception, reading and psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Massaro, D. W. Letter information and orthographic context in word perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 595–609.
Massaro, D. W., &Oden, G. C. Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980,67, 996–1013. (a)
Massaro, D. W., &Oden, G. C. Speech perception: A framework for research and theory. In N. J. Lass (Ed.),Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press, 1980. (b)
Massaro, D. W., Taylor, G. A., Venezky, R. L., Jastrzembski, J. E., &Lucas, P. A.Letter and word perception: Orthographic structure and visual processing in reading. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980.
Mortos, J. Interaction of information in word recognition.PsychologicaI Review, 1969,76, 165–178.
Oden, G. C., &Massaro, D. W. Integration of featural information in speech perception.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 172–191.
Pollack, I., &Pickectt, J. M. The intelligibility of excerpts from conversation.Language and Speech, 1964,6, 165–171.
Rorton, A. H.A statistical analysis of Americann English. The Hague: Mouton, 1965.
Stevens, K. N., &Blumstein, S. E. Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978,64, 1358–1368.
Whorf, B. L.Language, thought and reality: Selected papers. New York: Wiley, 1956.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The preparation of this paler was supported in part by NIMH Grants MH-19399 and MH-35334.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Massaro, D.W., Cohen, M.M. Phonological context in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics 34, 338–348 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203046
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203046