Abstract
Two experiments were designed to investigate the use of optical flow for postural control as a function of its velocity, geometry, and retinal placement. In the first experiment, subjects were exposed to a room that moved at a velocity below the reported threshold for detection of point-light motion. In the second, the room was moved so that optical velocities were above this threshold. Compensatory sway was assessed for both lamellar and radial flow to central and peripheral areas of the retina. Compensatory sway was elicited with optical velocities below the point-light motion threshold, suggesting that this threshold is not relevant to the detection of egomotion. The results also indicate that the retinal periphery does not detect posture-relevant information from flow fields with a radial dynamic structure. Since the higher velocities used in the second experiment exceeded those generated by natural postural instabilities, it was concluded that radial flow in the retinal periphery is not used as a source of information for normal postural maintenance, and therefore that flow structure is an important factor in the detection and control of egomotion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, G. J., &Braunstein, M. (1985). Induced self-motion in central vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 122–132.
Berthoz, A., Pavard, B., &Young, L. R. (1975). Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linearvection).Experimental Brain Research,23, 471–489.
Bonnet, C. (1982). Thresholds of motion perception. In A. Wertheim, W. Wagenaar, & H. Leibowitz (Eds.),Tutorials on motion perception (pp. 41–80). New York: Plenum Press.
Brandt, T., Dichgans, J., &Koenig, E. (1973). Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception.Experimental Brain Research,16, 476–491.
Cutting, J. (1986).Perception with an eye toward motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Brandford Books.
Dichgans, J., &Brandt, T. (1978). Visual-vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In R. Held, H. Leibowitz, & H. Teuber (Eds.),Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. 8, pp. 755–804). New York: Springer.
Gibson, J. J. (1950).The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1979)The ecological approach to visual perception Boston: Houghton-Mifflin
Howard, I (1982)Human visual orientation. New York: Wiley
Johansson, G., von Hofsten, C., &Jansson, G. (1980). Event perception.Annual Review of Psychology,31, 27–63
Koenderink, J., &van Doorn, A. (1981) Exterospecific component of the motion parallax field.Journal of the Optical Socitey of America,71, 953–957
Lee, D. N., &Lishman, J. (1975). Visual proprioceptive control of stanceJournal of Human Movement Studies,1, 87–95.
Leibowitz, H., Johnson, C., &Isabelle, E. (1972). Peripheral motion detection and refractive errorScience,177, 1207–1208
Leibowitz, H., Shupert-Rodemer, C., &Dichgans, J. (1979). The independence of dynamic spatial orientation from luminance and refractive error.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 75–79
Stoffregen, T. A. (1985). Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 554–565.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
These experiments were carded out at Cornell University in the laboratory of Eleanor J. Gibson.
The data were reported in a talk at the Third International Conference on Event Perception and Action, Uppsala, Sweden, June 1985.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stoffregen, T.A. The role of optical velocity in the control of stance. Perception & Psychophysics 39, 355–360 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203004
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203004