Abstract
Evidence is still inconclusive regarding the locus of the stimulus intensity effect on information processing in reaction tasks. Miller, Ulrich, and Rinkenauer (1999) addressed this question by assessing the intensity effect on stimulus- and response-locked lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) as indices of the sensory and motor parts of reaction time (RT). In the case of visual stimuli, they observed that application of brighter stimuli resulted in a shortening of RT and stimulus-locked LRP (S-LRP), but not of response-locked LRP (R-LRP). The results for auditory stimuli, however, were unclear. In spite of a clear RT reduction due to increased loudness, neither S-LRP nor R-LRP onset was affected. A reason for this failure might have been a relatively small range of intensity variation and the type of task. To check for this possibility, we performed three experiments in which broader ranges of stimulus intensities and simple, rather than choice, response tasks were used. Although the intensity effect on the R-LRP was negligible, S-LRP followed RT changes, irrespective of stimulus modality. These findings support the conclusion that stimulus intensity exerts its effect before the start of motoric processes. Finally, S-LRP and R-LRP findings are discussed within a broader information-processing perspective to check the validity of the claim that S-LRP and R-LRP can, indeed, be considered as pure estimates of the duration of sensory and motor processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Band, G. P., &Miller, J. (1997). Mental rotation interferes with response preparation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 319–338.
Bartlett, N. R., &MacLeod, S. (1954). Effect of flash and field luminance upon human reaction time.Journal of Optical Society of America,44, 306–311.
Brauner, J. D., &Lit, A. (1976). The Pulfrich effect, simple reaction time, and time intensity discrimination.American Journal of Psychology,89, 105–114.
Callaway, E., Halliday, R., Naylor, H., &Thouvenin, D. (1984). The latency of the average is not the average of the latencies.Psychophysiology,21, 571.
Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition.Psychophysiology,26, 251–269.
Eimer, M., &Coles, M. G. H. (2003). The lateralized readiness potential. In M. Jahanshahi & M. Hallett (Eds.),The Bereitschaftspotential: Movement-related cortical potentials (pp. 229–248). New York: Kluwer.
Everett, B. L., Hochhaus, L., &Brown, J. R. (1985). Letter-naming as a function of intensity, degradation, S-R compatibility, and practice.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 467–470.
Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., &Blanke, L. (1990). Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. In C. H. M. Brunia, A. W. K. Gaillard, & A. Kok (Eds.),Psychophysiological brain research (pp. 192–195). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
García-Larrea, L., Lukaszewicz, A.-C., &Mauguière, F. (1992). Revisiting the oddball paradigm: Non-target vs neutral stimuli and the evaluation of ERP attentional effects.Neuropsychologia,30, 723–741.
Hackley, S. A., &Miller, J. O. (1995). Response complexity and precue interval effects on the lateralized readiness potential.Psychophysiology,32, 230–241.
Hackley, S. A., &Valle-Inclán, F. (1998). Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task.Nature,391, 786–788.
Hackley, S. A., &Valle-Inclán, F. (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,11, 321–329.
Jaśkowski, P. (1985). The effect of visual adaptation on simple motor reaction time: Pt. I.Studia Psychologica,27, 191–201.
Jaśkowski, P. (1992). Temporal-order judgment and reaction time for short and long stimuli.Psychological Research,54, 141–145.
Jaśkowski, P. (1996). Simple reaction time and perception of temporal order: Dissociations and hypotheses.Perceptual & Motor Skills,82, 707–730.
Jaśkowski, P., Pruszewicz, A., &świdziński, P. (1990). VEP latency and some properties of simple motor reaction-time distribution.Psychological Research,52, 28–34.
Jaśkowski, P., Rybarczyk, K., &Jaroszyk, F. (1994). The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time and stimulus intensity.Psychological Research,56, 59–65.
Jaśkowski, P., Rybarczyk, K., Jaroszyk, F., &Lemański, D. (1995). The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans.Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis,55, 57–64.
Jaśkowski, P., &Verleger, R. (2000). Attentional bias toward low-intensity stimuli: An explanation for the intensity dissociation between reaction time and temporal order judgment?Consciousness & Cognition,9, 435–456.
Jaśkowski, P., &Włodarczyk, D. (2006). Task modulation of the effect of brightness on reaction time and response force.International Journal of Psychophysiology,61, 98–112.
Kammer, T., Lehr, L., &Kirschfeld, K. (1999). Cortical visual processing is temporally dispersed by luminance in human subjects.Neuroscience Letters,263, 133–136.
Keuss, P. J. G., &van der Molen, M. W. (1982). Positive and negative effects of stimulus intensity in auditory reaction tasks: Further studies on immediate arousal.Acta Psychologica,52, 61–72.
Kotchoubey, B. (2002). Do event-related brain potentials reflect mental (cognitive) operations?Journal of Psychophysiology,16, 129–149.
Külpe, O. (1895).Outlines of psychology (E. B. Titchener, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
Leuthold, H. (2003). Programming of expected and unexpected movements: Effects on the onset of the lateralized readiness potential.Acta Psychologica,114, 83–100.
Leuthold, H., &Sommer, W. (1998). Postperceptual effects and P300 latency.Psychophysiology,35, 34–46.
Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., &Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 307–323.
Meyer, D. E., Osman, A., Irwin, D. E., &Yantis, S. (1988). Modern mental chronometry.Biological Psychology,26, 3–67.
Miller, J. [O.], Franz, V., &Ulrich, R. (1999). Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 107–119.
Miller, J. O., &Low, K. (2001). Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: A psychophysiological analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 266–289.
Miller, J. O., &Pachella, R. G. (1973). Locus of stimulus probability effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology,101, 227–231.
Miller, J. O., &Pachella, R. G. (1976). Encoding processes in memory scanning tasks.Memory & Cognition,4, 501–506.
Miller, J. [O.], Patterson, T., &Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknifebased method for measuring LRP onset latency differences.Psychophysiology,35, 99–115.
Miller, J. [O.], &Ulrich, R. (1998). Locus of the effect of the number of alternative responses: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1215–1231.
Miller, J. [O.], Ulrich, R., &Rinkenauer, G. (1999). Effects of stimulus intensity on the lateralized readiness potential.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1454–1471.
Mordkoff, J. T., &Gianaros, P. J. (2000). Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: A comparison of available methods and procedures.Psychophysiology,37, 347–360.
Morgan, M. J. (1976). Pulfrich effect and the filling in of apparent motion.Perception,5, 187–195.
Morgan, M. J. (1977). Differential visual persistence between the two eyes: A model for the Fertsch-Pulfrich effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 484–495.
Morgan, M. J., &Thompson, P. (1975). Apparent motion and the Pulfrich effect.Perception,4, 3–18.
Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., &Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.Psychophysiology,40, 597–611.
Niemi, P. (1979). Stimulus intensity effects on auditory and visual reaction processes.Acta Psychologica,43, 299–312.
Niemi, P., &Lehtonen, E. (1982). Foreperiod and visual stimulus intensity: A reappraisal.Acta Psychologica,50, 73–82.
Osman, A., Lou, L., Müller-Gethmann, H., Rinkenauer, G., Mattes, S., &Ulrich, R. (2000). Mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff: Evidence from covert motor processes.Biological Psychology,51, 173–199.
Osman, A., &Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1292–1312.
Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 573–594). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pachella, R. G., &Miller, J. O. (1976). Stimulus probability and same-different classification.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 29–34.
Raab, D., Fehrer, E., &Hershenson, M. (1961). Visual reaction time and the Broca-Sulzer phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology,61, 193–199.
Rinkenauer, G., Osman, A., Ulrich, R., Müller-Gethmann, H., &Mattes, S. (2004). On the locus of speed-accuracy trade-off in reaction time: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 261–282.
Roufs, J. A. J. (1974). Dynamic properties of vision: V. Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds.Vision Research,14, 853–869.
Sanders, A. F. (1975). The foreperiod effect revisited.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,27, 591–598.
Sanders, A. F., &Andriessen, J. E. B. (1978). A suppressing effect of response selection on immediate arousal in a choice reaction time.Acta Psychologica,42, 181–186.
Sanford, A. J. (1971). Effect of changes in the intensity of white noise on simultaneity judgments and simple reaction time.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,23, 296–303.
Sanford, A. J. (1974). Attention bias and the relation of perception lag to simple reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 443–446.
Schweickert, R., Dahn, C., &McGuigan, K. (1988). Intensity and number of alternatives in hue identification: Piéron’s law and choice reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 383–389.
Shwartz, S. P., Pomerantz, J. R., &Egeth, H. E. (1977). State and process limitations in information processing: An additive factors analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 403–410.
Smulders, F. T. Y., Kenemans, J. L., &Kok, A. (1994). A comparison of different methods for estimating single-trial P300 latencies.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,92, 107–114.
Smulders, F. T. Y., Kok, A., Kenemans, J. L., &Bashore, T. R. (1995). The temporal selectivity of additive factor effects on the reaction process revealed in ERP component latencies.Acta Psychologica,90, 97–109.
Stanovich, K. E., &Pachella, R. G. (1977). Encoding, stimulus- response compatibility, and stages of processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 411–421.
Sternberg, S., &Knoll, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV (pp. 629–685). New York: Academic Press.
Thomas, R. D. (2006). Processing time predictions of current models of perception in the classic additive factors paradigm.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,50, 441–455.
Ulrich, R., Mattes, S., &Miller, J. [O.] (1999). Donders’ assumption of pure insertion: An evaluation on the basis of response dynamics.Acta Psychologica,102, 43–75.
Ulrich, R., &Miller, J. [O.] (2001). Using the jackknife-based scor ing method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs.Psychophysiology,38, 816–827.
van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Havik, M. M., Bekker, E. M., &Postma, A. (2006). Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.Psychophysiology,43, 145–160.
van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Jaśkowski, P., Wauschkuhn, B., &Verleger, R. (2001). Influence of time pressure in a simple response task, a choice-by-location task, and the Simon task.Journal of Psychophysiology,15, 241–255.
van der Molen, M. W., &Keuss, P. J. G. (1979). The relationship between reaction time and intensity in discrete auditory tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,31, 95–102.
van der Molen, M. W., &Keuss, P. J. G. (1981). Response selection and the processing of auditory intensity.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33, 177–184.
van der Molen, M. W., &Orlebeke, J. F. (1980). Phasic heart rate change and the U-shaped relationship between choice reaction time and auditory signal intensity.Psychophysiology,17, 471–481.
Vaughan, H. G., Jr.,Costa, L. D., &Gilden, L. (1966). The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity.Vision Research,6, 645–656.
Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry.Psychophysiology,34, 131–156.
Williams, J. M., &Lit, A. (1983). Luminance-dependent visual latency for the Hess effect, Pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time.Vision Research,23, 171–179.
Wilson, A. J., &Lit, A. (1981). Effects of photopic annulus luminance level on reaction time and on the latency of evoked cortical potential responses to target flashes.Journal of the Optical Society of America,71, 1481–1486.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by Grant 1H01F 101 27 from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaśkowski, P., Kurczewska, M., Nowik, A. et al. Locus of the intensity effect in simple reaction time tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 1334–1343 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192950
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192950