Abstract
Selective attention has been intensively studied using the Stroop task. Evidence suggests that Stroop interference in a color-naming task arises partly because of visual attention sharing between color and word: Removing the target color after 150 msec reduces interference (Neumann, 1986). Moreover, removing both the color and the word simultaneously reduces interference less than does removing the color only (La Heij, van der Heijden, & Plooij, 2001). These findings could also be attributed to Gestalt grouping principles, such as common fate. We report three experiments in which the role of Gestalt grouping was further investigated. Experiment 1 replicated the reduced interference, using words and color patches. In Experiment 2, the color patch was not removed but only repositioned (<2°) after 100 msec, which also reduced interference. In Experiment 3, the distractor was repositioned while the target remained stationary, again reducing interference. These results indicate a role for Gestalt grouping in selective attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blaser, E., Pylyshyn, Z. W., &Holcombe, A. O. (2000). Tracking an object through feature space.Nature,408, 196–199.
Brown, T. L. (1996). Attentional selection and word processing in Stroop and word search tasks: The role of selection for action.American Journal of Psychology,109, 265–286.
Brown, T. L., Gore, C. L., &Carr, T. H. (2002). Visual attention and word recognition in Stroop color naming: Is word recognition “automatic”?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131, 220–240.
Brown, T. L., Gore, C. L., &Pearson, T. (1998). Visual half-field Stroop effects with spatial separation of words and color targets.Brain & Language,63, 122–142.
Brown, T. L., Roos-Gilbert, L., &Carr, T. H. (1995). Automaticity and word perception: Evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1395–1411.
De Jong, R., Berendsen, E., &Cools, R. (1999). Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations.Acta Psychologica,101, 379–394.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 501–517.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 317–329.
Gatti, S. V., &Egeth, H. E. (1978). Failure of spatial selectivity in vision.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,11, 181–184.
Glaser, M. O., &Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 875–894.
Hagenaar, R., &van der Heijden, A. H. (1986). Target-noise separation in visual selective attention.Acta Psychologica,62, 161–176.
Han, S., Humphreys, G. W., &Chen, L. (1999). Uniform connectedness and classical Gestalt principles of perceptual grouping.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 661–674.
Hillstrom, A. P., &Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 399–411.
Kahneman, D., &Chajczyk, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 497–509.
Kahneman, D., &Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 181–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kanwisher, N., &Wojciulik, E. (2000). Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,1, 91–100.
La Heij, W., Kaptein, N. A., Kalff, A. C., &de Lange, L. (1995). Reducing color-color interference by optimizing selection for action.Psychological Research,57, 119–130.
La Heij, W., van der Heijden, A. H. C., &Plooij, P. (2001). A paradoxical exposure-duration effect in the Stroop task: Temporal segregation between stimulus attributes facilitates selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 622–632.
Lee, S. H., &Blake, R. (2001). Neural synergy in visual grouping: When good continuation meets common fate.Vision Research,41, 2057–2064.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
MacLeod, C. M. (1998). Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation.Memory & Cognition,26, 201–211.
Merikle, P. M., &Gorewich, N. J. (1979). Spatial selectivity in vision: Field size depends upon noise size.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,14, 343–346.
Miller, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 567–571.
Neumann, O. (1986).How automatic is Stroop interference? (Rep. No. 109/1986). Bielefeld: University of Bielefeld.
O’Craven, K. M., Downing, P. E., &Kanwisher, N. (1999). fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection.Nature,401, 584–587.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics.Psychological Bulletin,86, 446–461.
Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks.Psychological Research,66, 312–323.
Roelofs, A., &Lamers, M. (2007). Modelling the control of visual attention in Stroop-like tasks. In A. S. Meyer, L. R. Wheeldon, & A. Krott (Eds.),Automaticity and control in language processing (pp. 123–142). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Schoenfeld, M. A., Tempelmann, C., Martinez, A., Hopf, J. M., Sattler, C., Heinze, H.-J., &Hillyard, S. A. (2003). Dynamics of feature binding during object-selective attention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,100, 11806–11811.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
Stürzel, F., &Spillmann, L. (2004). Perceptual limits of common fate.Vision Research,44, 1565–1573.
Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., &Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 492–504.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Uttal, W. R., Spillmann, L., Stürzel, F., &Sekuler, A. B. (2000). Motion and shape in common fate.Vision Research,40, 301–310.
Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II [Laws of organization in perceptual forms].Psychologische Forschung,4, 301–350.
Wühr, P., &Waszak, F. (2003). Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop effect.Memory & Cognition,31, 983–994.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The preparation of this article was supported by a VICI grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) to A.R.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamers, M.J.M., Roelofs, A. Role of Gestalt grouping in selective attention: Evidence from the Stroop task. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 1305–1314 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192947
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192947