Abstract
Studies on the involvement of object completions in search for illusory figures have so far reported equivocal results. We have addressed this issue by investigating at which level object attributes in Kanizsa figures influence search. Employing a paradigm that investigated global and local attributes in the composition of distractors with relation to target composition, we report a selective involvement of multilevel processing upon detection. Four experiments demonstrate that global surface information, but not the surrounding global contour, determines the speed of Kanizsa figure detection. By contrast, local inducer information is encoded far less efficiently in search than processes computing the global object. Our conclusions are that surface filling-in acts as a major determinant of search, but depends on the relevance of the particular hierarchical level (local or global) coding the target.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Conci, M., Gramann, K., Müller, H. J., &Elliott, M. A. (2006). Electrophysiological correlates of similarity-based interference during detection of visual forms.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,18, 880–888.
Conci, M., Müller, H. J., &Elliott, M. A. (2007). Closure of salient regions determines search for a collinear target configuration.Perception & Psychophysics,69, 32–47.
Davis, G., &Driver, J. (1994). Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system.Nature,371, 291–293.
Davis, G., &Driver, J. (1998). Kanizsa subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces at parallel stages of visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 169–184.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Enns, J. T., &Kingstone, A. (1995). Access to global and local properties in visual search to compound stimuli.Psychological Science,6, 283–291.
Ffytche, D. H., &Zeki, S. (1996). Brain activity related to the perception of illusory contours.NeuroImage,3, 104–108.
Garner, W. R., &Clement, D. E. (1963). Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,2, 446–452.
Grabowecky, M., &Treisman, A. M. (1989). Attention and fixation in subjective contour perception.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,30, 457.
Grossberg, S. (2000). The complementary brain: Unifying brain dynamics and modularity.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 233–246.
Grossberg, S., &Mingolla, E. (1985). Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures and neon color spreading.Psychological Review,92, 173–211.
Grossberg, S., &Mingolla, E. (1987). The role of illusory contours in visual segmentation. In S. Petry & G. E. Meyer (Eds.),The perception of illusory contours (pp. 116–125). New York: Springer.
Gurnsey, R., Humphrey, G. K., &Kapitan, P. (1992). Parallel discrimination of subjective contours defined by offset gratings.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 263–276.
Gurnsey, R., Poirier, F. J. A. M., &Gascon, E. (1996). There is no evidence that Kanizsa-type subjective contours can be detected in parallel.Perception,25, 861–874.
He, Z. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search.Nature,359, 231–233.
Hirsch, J., de la Paz, R. L., Relkin, N. R., Victor, J., Kim, K., Li, T.,et al. (1995). Illusory contours activate specific regions in human visual cortex: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,92, 6469–6473.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.Journal of Physiology,195, 215–243.
Kanizsa, G. (1955). Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogenea. [Quasi-perceptional margins in homogeneously stimulated fields.].Rivista di Psycologia,49, 7–30.
Lee, T. S., &Nguyen, M. (2001). Dynamics of contour formation in the early visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,98, 1907–1911.
Lesher, G. W. (1995). Illusory contours: Towards a neurally based perceptual theory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 279–321.
Murray, M. M., Wylie, G. R., Higgins, B. A., Javitt, D.C., Schroeder, C. E., &Foxe, J. J. (2002). The spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: Combined high-density electrical mapping, source analysis, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of Neuroscience,22, 5055–5073.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology,9, 353–383.
Palmer, S. E., Brooks, J. L., &Nelson, R. (2003). When does grouping happen?Acta Psychologica,114, 311–330.
Peterhans, E., &von der Heydt, R. (1991). Subjective contours: Bridging the gap between psychophysics and physiology.Trends in Neurosciences,14, 112–119.
Rauschenberger, R., &Yantis, S. (2001). Attentional capture by globally defined objects.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1250–1261.
Rauschenberger, R., &Yantis, S. (2006). Perceptual encoding efficiency in visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,135, 116–131.
Rensink, R. A., &Enns, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping.Psychological Review,102, 101–130.
Rensink, R. A., &Enns, J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects.Vision Research,28, 2489–2505.
Roelfsma, P. R., Lamme, V. A. F, Spekreijse, H., &Bosch, H. (2002). Figure-ground segregation in a recurrent network architecture.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,14, 525–537.
Spillmann, L., &Dresp, B. (1995). Phenomena of illusory form: Can we bridge the gap between levels of explanation?Perception,24, 1333–1364.
Stanley, D. A., &Rubin, N. (2003). fMRI activation in response to illusory contours and salient regions in the human lateral occipital complex.Neuron,37, 323–331.
Treisman, A. M., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
von der Heydt, R., Peterhans, E., &Baumgartner, G. (1984). Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses.Science,224, 1260–1262.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by German Research Foundation (DFG) Project Grants MU 1564/2 and EL 248/2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conci, M., Müller, H.J. & Elliott, M.A. The contrasting impact of global and local object attributes on Kanizsa figure detection. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 1278–1294 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192945
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192945