Abstract
Some of the effects of low temperature, low salinity, prey size, and predator source on the predatory activity ofStylochus ellipticus on oysters were investigated in the laboratory.
Lowering temperatures below 10 C resulted in a progressive decrease in predation. Salinities as low as 5‰, approximately the lower limit of tolerability of the oysters, appeared to give no lasting decrease in predation. As an oyster predator,S. ellipticus primarily attacked small individuals but large worms (20 mm long) killed oysters as long as 61 mm.
S. ellipticus from seven localities were observed in the laboratory for differences in predatory activity on oysters and barnacles. An obvious preference for one or the other prey species was demonstrated by worms from each locality. Worms from higher salinities preferred barnacles, whereas those from lower salinities preferred oysters. Prey preference might be correlated with a comparatively greater abundance of barnacles in higher salinities and oysters in lower salinities. This relationship could be consistent with the hypothesis of “ingestive conditioning,” which states that a predator develops a tendency to respond more readily to effluents from a given invertebrate prey species after ingestion of living tissues of that species.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Literature Cited
HOPKINS, S. H. 1949. Preliminary survey of the literature onStylochus and other flatworms associated with oysters.Tex. A. and M. Res. Found. Proj. 9, 1–16.
— 1950. Addendum to “Preliminary survey of the literature onStylochus and other flatworms associated with oysters”.Tex. A. and M. Res. Found. Proj. 9, 1–4.
HYMAN, L. H. 1940. The polyclad flatworms of the Atlantic Coast of the United States and Canada.Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 89(3101):449–495.
LANDERS, W. S., AND R. C. TONER. 1962. Survival and movements of the flatworm,Stylochus ellipticus, in different salinities and temperatures.Biol. Bull. 123(1):146–153.
LOOSANOFF, V. L., 1956. Two obscure oyster enemies in New England waters.Science 123(3208):1119–1120.
NELSON, T. C. 1939. Report of the biologist.N. J. Agr. Coll. Exp. Sta. 1938:24–27.
PEARSE, A. S., AND J. W. LITTLER. 1938. Polyclads of Beaufort, N. C.J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 54(2):235–244.
— AND G. W. WHARTON. 1938. The oyster “leech”,Stylochus inimicus Palombi, associated with oysters on the coast of Florida.Ecol. Monogr. 8:605–655.
PROVENZANO, A. J., JR. 1959. Effects of the flatworm,Stylochus ellipticus (Girard), on oyster spat in two salt water ponds in Massachusetts.Proc. Nat. Shellfish. Assoc. 50:83–88.
WEBSTER, J. R., AND R. Z. MEDFORD. 1959. Flatworm distribution and associated oyster mortality in Chesapeake Bay.Proc. Nat. Shellfish. Assoc. 50:89–95.
WOOD, LANGLEY. 1968. Physiological and econological aspects of prey selection by the marine gastropodUrosalpinx cinerea (Prosobranchia: Muricidae).Malacologia 6(3):267–320.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Landers, W.S., Rhodes, E.W. Some factors influencing predation by the flatworm,Stylochus ellipticus (Girard), on oysters. Chesapeake Science 11, 55–60 (1970). https://doi.org/10.2307/1351343
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1351343