Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spotlight on fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy

  • Adis Spotlight
  • Published:
American Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Fulvestrant (Faslodex®) is a novel estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that competitively binds to the ER with a much greater affinity than that of tamoxifen. The downregulation of cellular levels of the ER protein results in complete abrogation of estrogen-sensitive gene transcription. This distinct mechanism of action ensures a lack of cross resistance with other hormonal agents and, in contrast to tamoxifen, fulvestrant has no known estrogen-agonist effects.

Fulvestrant is administered via monthly intramuscular injections (250mg) and is recommended for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy.

The efficacy of fulvestrant was similar to that of the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (1 mg/day) in two, well designed studies in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer that had progressed during prior antiestrogen therapy. Time to disease progression (primary endpoint) and treatment failure, rates of objective response and clinical benefit, overall survival, and quality of life were similar in patients treated with fulvestrant or anastrozole. In retrospective noninferiority analyses, fulvestrant was at least as effective as anastrozole in all randomized patients, and in those with or without visceral metastases.

Fulvestrant is generally well tolerated and was tolerated as well as anastrozole in clinical trials. Treatment-related adverse events were mostly mild to moderate and led to treatment withdrawal in about 1% of patients who received fulvestrant or anastrozole. The main adverse effects associated with therapy are nausea, asthenia, pain, vasodilation, and headache.

In conclusion, monthly intramuscular injections of fulvestrant are at least as effective and as well tolerated as oral anastrozole once daily in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on prior antiestrogen therapy. Because of a different mode of action to that of other hormonal agents, fulvestrant is effective in the treatment of tamoxifen-resistant disease and, unlike tamoxifen, has no known estrogen agonist effects. Thus, fulvestrant provides an effective and well tolerated option for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Wakeling AE, Dukes M, Bowler J. A potent specific pure antiestrogen with clinical potential. Cancer Res 1991; 51(15): 3867–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wakeling AE, Bowler J. Steroidal pure antioestrogens. J Endocrinol 1987; 112(3): R7–R10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Parker MG. Action of ‘pure’ antiestrogens inhibiting estrogen receptor action. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1993; 26: 131–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fawell SE, White R, Hoare S, et al. Inhibition of estrogen receptor-DNA binding by the “pure” antiestrogen ICI 164,384 appears to be mediated by impaired receptor dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87: 6883–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dauvois S, White R, Parker MG. The antiestrogen ICI 182780 disrupts estrogen receptor nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. J Cell Sci 1993 Dec; 106: 1377–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dauvois S, Danielian PS, White R, et al. Antiestrogenic ICI 164,384 reduces cellular estrogen receptor content by increasing its turnover. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 4037–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DeFriend DJ, Howell A, Nicholson RI, et al. Investigation of a new pure antiestrogen (ICI 182780) in women with primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 408–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robertson JF, Nicholson RI, Bundred NJ, et al. Comparison of the short-term biological effects of 7alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)-nonyl]estra-1,3,5, (10)-triene-3,17beta-diol (Faslodex) versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 2001 Sep 15; 61(18): 6739–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bundred N, Anderson E, Nicholson RI, et al. ICI 182,780 (Faslodex) an estrogen receptor downregulator reduces cell turnover index more effectively than tamoxifen [abstract no. 1660]. 37th Annual Meeting of the Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001 May 12; 20 Pt 1: 416

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nuttall ME, Pendrak I, Emery JG, et al. Antagonism of oestrogen action in human breast and endometrial cells in vitro: potential novel antitumour agents. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2001 May; 47(5): 437–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Addo S, Yates RA, Laight A. A phase I trial to assess the pharmacology of the new oestrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant on the endometrium in healthy post-menopausal volunteers. Br J Cancer 2002 Dec 2; 87(12): 1354–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Long BJ, Tilghman SL, Yue W, et al. The steroidal antiestrogen ICI 182,780 is an inhibitor of cellular aromatase activity. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1998; 67: 293–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan TW, Pollak M, Huynh H. Inhibition of insulin-like growth factor signaling pathways in mammary gland by pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780. Clin Cancer Res 2001 Aug; 7(8): 2545–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hyder SM, Stancel GM. Inhibition of progesterone-induced VEGF production in human breast cancer cells by the pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780. Cancer Lett 2002 Jul 8; 181(1): 47–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dick GM. The pure anti-oestrogen ICI 182,780 (Faslodex™) activates large conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels in smooth muscle. Br J Pharmacol 2002 Aug; 136(7): 961–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. de Cupis A, Noonan D, Pirani P, et al. Comparison between novel steroid-like and conventional nonsteroidal antioestrogens in inhibiting oestradiol- and IGF-I-induced proliferation of human breast cancer-derived cells. Br J Pharmacol 1995; 116: 2391–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DeFriend DJ, Anderson E, Bell J, et al. Effects of 4-hydroxytamoxifen and a novel pure antioestrogen (ICI 182780) on the clonogenic growth of human breast cancer cells in vitro. Br J Cancer 1994; 70: 204–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lykkesfeldt AE, Larsen SS, Briand P. Human breast cancer cell lines resistant to pure anti-estrogens are sensitive to tamoxifen treatment. Int J Cancer 1995; 61: 529–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lykkesfeldt AE, Madsen MW, Briand P. Altered expression of estrogen-regulated genes in a tamoxifen-resistant and ICI 164,384 and ICI 182,780 sensitive human breast cancer cell line, MCF-7/TAMR-1. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 1587–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Coradini D, Biffi A, Cappelletti V, et al. Activity of tamoxifen and new antiestrogens on estrogen receptor positive and negative breast cancer cells. Anti-cancer Res 1994; 14: 1059–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Osborne CK, Jarman M, McCague R, et al. The importance of tamoxifen metabolism in tamoxifen-stimulated breast tumor growth. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1994; 34: 89–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Osborne CK, Coronado-Heinsohn EB, Hilsenbeck SG, et al. Comparison of the effects of a pure steroidal antiestrogen with those of tamoxifen in a model of human breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 746–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu XF, Veroni M, De Luise M, et al. Circumvention of tamoxifen resistance by the pure anti-estrogen ICI 182, 780. Int J Cancer 1993; 55: 873–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim KB, Ng CY, Ong CK, et al. Induction of apoptosis in mammary gland by a pure anti-estrogen ICI 182780. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001 Jul; 68: 127–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Diel P, Smolnikar K, Michna H. The pure antiestrogen ICI 182780 is more effective in the induction of apoptosis and down regulation of BCL-2 than tamoxifen in MCF-7 cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999; 58(2): 87–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ellis PA, Saccani-Jotti G, Clarke R, et al. Induction of apoptosis by tamoxifen and ICI 182780 in primary breast cancer. Int J Cancer 1997; 72(4): 608–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bundred NJ, Anderson E, Nicholson RI, et al. Fulvestrant, an estrogen receptor downregulator, reduces cell turnover index more effectively than tamoxifen. Anticancer Res 2002 Jul; 22(4): 2317–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Erikstein B, Robertson JF, Osborne CK, et al. ICI 182,780 (faslodex) 250 mg monthly intramuscular injection shows consistent PK profile when given as either 1 × 5ml or 2 × 2.5 MI injections in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer [abstract no. 2025]. 37th Annual Meeting of the Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001 May 12; 20 Pt 2: 69

    Google Scholar 

  29. Robertson JF, Harrison MP. Equivalent single-dose pharmacokinetics of two different dosing methods of prolonged-release fulvestrant (Faslodex) in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2003 Oct; 52(4): 346–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. AstraZeneca. Faslodex: fulvestrant injection [online]. Available from URL: http://www.astrazeneca.com [Accessed 2003 Nov 5]

  31. Harrison M, Laight A, Clarke D, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of fulvestrant after oral, intravenous and intramuscular administration in healthy volunteers [abstract no. 564]. Eur J Cancer 2003; 1Suppl. 5: S171

    Google Scholar 

  32. Laight A, Yates R, Rose A, et al. Fulvestrant is unlikely to be involved in clinically significant drug interactions: results of clinical trials in healthy male volunteers [abstract no. 133]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 33

    Google Scholar 

  33. Howell A, Robertson JFR, Quaresma Albano J, et al. Fulvestrant, formerly ICI 182,780, is as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine treatment. J Clin Oncol 2002 Aug 15; 20(16): 3396–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Osborne CK, Pippen J, Jones SE, et al. Double-blind, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior endocrine therapy: results of a North American trial. J Clin Oncol 2002 Aug 15; 20(16): 3386–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pippen J, Osborne CK, Howell A, et al. Fulvestrant (Faslodex) versus anastrozole (Arimidex) for the treatment of advanced breast cancer: a prospective combined survival analysis of two multicenter trials [abstract no. 426]. 26th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2003 Dec 3–6; San Antonio (TX). Available from URL: http://www.sabcs.org/

  36. Mauriac L, Pippen JE, Quaresma Albano J, et al. Fulvestrant (Faslodex) versus anastrozole for the second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer in subgroups of postmenopausal women with visceral and non-visceral metastases: combined results from two multicentre trials. Eur J Cancer 2003 Jun; 39(9): 1228–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Robertson JF, Osborne CK, Howell A, et al. Fulvestrant versus anastrozole for the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women: a prospective combined analysis of two multicenter trials. Cancer 2003 Jul 15; 98(2): 229–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The full text article in Drugs 2004; 64 (6): 633-648 was reviewed by: M. Baum, Department of Surgery, University College London, London, UK; R.W. Blamey, Nottingham Breast Institute, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK; A.U. Buzdar, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA; A. Howell, Department of Medical Oncology, Christie CRC Research Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK; I. Vergote, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate McKeage.

Additional information

This Spotlight is derived from abstract and summary text of an Adis Drug Evaluation originally published in full in Drugs 2004; 64 (6) 633–648. Reviewers of the original full text article are listed in the Acknowledgments section.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKeage, K., Curran, M.P. & Plosker, G.L. Spotlight on fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy. Am J Cancer 3, 267–270 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2165/00024669-200403040-00008

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00024669-200403040-00008

Keywords

Navigation