Abstract
Self-report data are ubiquitous in behavioral and medical research. Retrospective assessment strategies are prone to recall bias and distortion. New techniques for assessing immediate experiences in respondents' natural environments (e.g., Ecological Momentary Assessment [1], Experience Sampling [2]) are being used by many researchers to reduce reporting bias. This article discusses seven aspects of momentary research that are often overlooked or minimized in the presentation of momentary research reports, yet that are critical to the success of the research: (a) the rationale for the momentary sampling design, (b) the details of momentary sampling procedures, (c) the data acquisition interface, (d) rates of compliance with the sampling plan, (e) the procedures used to train and monitor participants, (f) data management procedures, and (g) the data analytic approach. Attention to these areas in both the design and reporting of momentary research studies will not only improve momentary research protocols but also allow for the successful replication of research findings by other investigators.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Stone A, Neale J, Cox D, et al.: Daily events are associated with a secretory response to an oral antigen in humans.Health Psychology. 1994,13:440–446.
DeVries M:The Experience of Psychopathology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Stone A, Turkkan J, Jobe J, et al.:The Science of Self Report. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2000.
Bradburn N, Rips L, Shevell S: Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys.Science. 1987,236:151–167.
Gorin AA, Stone AA: Recall biases and cognitive errors in retrospective self-reports: A call for momentary assessments. In Baum A, Revenson T, Singer J (eds),Handbook of Health Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (inpress), 405–413.
Erskine A, Morley S, Pearce S: Memory for pain: A review.Pain. 1990,41:255–265.
Salovey P, Sieber W, Jobe J, Willis G: The recall of physical pain. In Schwarz N, Sudman S (eds),Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports. New York:Springer-Verlag, 1993,89–106.
Schwarz N: Self-reports. How the questions shape the answers.American Psychologist. 1999,54:93–105.
Schwarz N, Sudman S:Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
Salovey P, Smith A, Turk D, Jobe J, Willis G: The accuracy of memory for pain: Not so bad most of the time.American Pain Society Journal. 1993,2:181–191.
Stone A, Broderick J, Porter L, Kaell A: The experience of rheumatoid arthritis pain and fatigue: Examining momentary reports and correlates over one week.Arthritis Care and Research. 1997,10:185–193.
Reis H, Gable S: Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In Reis H, Judd C (eds),Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2000,190–223.
Delespaul P:Assessing Schizophrenia in Daily Life-The Experience Sampling Method. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Maastricht University Press, 1995.
Shiffman S: Real-time self-report of momentary states in the natural environment: Computerized Ecological Momentary Assessment. In Stone A, Turkkan J, Jobe J, et al. (eds),The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2000,277–296.
Stone A, Valdimarsdottir H, Katkin E, et al.: Stressed-induced autonomic reactions are associated with altered mitogen responses.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1991,2:211–212.
Stone A, Neale J: Development of a methodology for assessing daily experiences. InAdvances in Environmental Psychology: Environment and Health (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1982,49–83.
RaudenbushS: Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials.Psychological Methods. 1997,2:173–185.
Marco C, Schwartz J, Neale J, Shiffman S, Stone A: Do appraisals of daily problems and how they are coped with moderate mood in everyday life?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1999,67:755–764.
Litt M, Cooney N, Morse P: Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) with treated alcoholics: Methodological problems and potential solutions.Health Psychology. 1998,17:48–52.
Rand C, Nides M, Cowles M, Wise R, Connett J: Long-term me-tered-dose inhaler adherence in a clinical trial.American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 1995,152:580–588.
Stone AA, Shiffman SS, Schwartz JE, Hufford M, Broderick JB: Patient non-compliance with paper diaries.British Medical Journal. 2002,324:1193–1194.
Shiffman S, Hufford M, Paty J: Subject Experience Diaries in Clinical Research. Part 1: The patient experience movement.Applied Clinical Trials. 2001,10:46–56.
Raymond S, Ross R: Electronic subject diaries in clinical trials.Applied Clinical Trials. 2000,9:48–58.
Affleck G, Tennen H, Keefe F, et al.: Everyday life with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis: Independent effects of disease and gender on daily pain, mood, and coping.Pain. 1999,83:601–609.
Michela J: Within-person correlational design. In Hendrick C, Clark M (eds),Review of Personality and Social Psychology Series. 1990,279–311.
Schwartz J, Stone A: Data analysis for EMA studies.Health Psychology. 1998,17:6–16.
West S, Hepworth J: Statistical issues in the study of temporal data: Daily experiences.Journal of Personality. 1991,59:609–662.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We thank Dr. Joseph Schwartz and Dr. Michael Hufford for comments on an early draft of this article.
About this article
Cite this article
Stone, A.A., Shiffman, S. Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. ann. behav. med. 24, 236–243 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2403_09
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2403_09