Abstract
There is a long history of statistical physics being looked to as a source of inspiration for the social sciences. There has been growing interest in the field. However, the bridge between the two has been imperfect. One way to understand why is that there are differences between their objects of explanation. While approaches derived from statistical physics may offer a useful tool in specific settings, it is vital to recognize when the insights that derive from them may be limited as a result of differences between the social and the physical world. We argue that methods from statistical physics can help in providing explanations of economic outcomes only if they include adequate attention to processes and moreover characterize these in an appropriate way, recognizing their specifically social character.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A. Banerjee, V. Yakovenko, New J. Phys. 12, 075032 (2010)
G.S. Becker, J. Political Econ. 70, 1 (1962)
P. Biswas, A.K. Bhattacharya, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43, 405003 (2010)
P. Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977)
P. Davidson, Uncertainty in economics, in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, edited by S. Kotz, C.B. Read, N. Balakrishnan, B. Vidakovic, N.L. Johnson (Wiley, 2012)
A. Deaton, N. Cartwright, Soc. Sci. Med. 210, 2 (2018)
A. Dixit, V. Norman, Theory of International Trade (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980)
P. dos Santos, Complexity 2017, 8358909 (2017)
P. dos Santos, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 229, 1603 (2020)
P. dos Santos, N. Weiner, Entropy 21, 367 (2019)
A. Dragulescu, Y. Yakovenko, Statistical mechanics of money, income, and wealth: A short survey, in Modeling of Complex Systems: Seventh Granada Lectures, AIP Conference Proceedings (New York, 2003), Vol. 661, pp. 180–183
N. Elias, The Society of Individuals (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1991)
R. Findlay, The Triangular trade and the Atlantic economy of the eighteenth century: A simple general-equilibrium model, in Essays in International Finance, No. 177 (Princeton University, 1990)
R. Findlay, K. O’Rourke, Power and Plenty: Trade, War, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2007)
D. Foley, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 229, 1591 (2020)
D. Foley, E. Scharfenaker, Maximum entropy estimation of statistical equilibrium in economic quantal response models, Working Paper 1710, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics, 2017
A.G. Frank, Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution (Monthly Review Press, New York, 1969)
S. Freud, Civilization and its Discontents, translated by J. Strachey (W.W. Norton, New York, 1961)
F. Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man (The Free Press, New York, 1992)
M. Gallegati, et al., Physica A 370, 1 (2006)
N. Georgescu-Roegen, The Entropy Law and the Economic Process (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971)
A. Gerschenkron, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1962)
A. Giddens, The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984)
S.J. Gould, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2002)
D. Harris, Joan Robinson on “History versus Equilibrium”, in Joan Robinson’s Economics A Centennial Celebration, edited by B. Gibson (Edward Elgar, 2005)
C.G. Hempel, P. Oppenheim, Philos. Sci. 15, 2 (1948)
E.T. Jaynes, Gibbs vs. Boltzmann Entropies (1964), in Papers on Probability, Statistics, and Statistical Physics, edited by R.D. Rosenkrantz (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983)
E.T. Jaynes, Foundations of probability theory and statistical mechanics, The Delaware Lecture (1967), in Papers on Probability, Statistics, and Statistical Physics, edited by R.D. Rosenkrantz (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983)
E.T. Jaynes, Probability Theory: The Logic of Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)
V. John, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62, 11 (2007)
J.M. Keynes, Treatise on Probability (Macmillan & Co., London, 1921)
P. Krugman, J. Political Econ. 99, 483 (1991)
S. Lukes, Br. J. Sociol. 19, 2 (1968)
E. Malinvaud, Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1977)
A. Marshall, Principles of Economics, revised edn. (Macmillan, London, 1920)
K. Marx, F. Engels, The German Ideology (Prometheus Books, , New York, 1846, 2011)
J.L. Muñoz-Cobo, R. Mendizábal, A. Miquel, C. Berna, A. Escrivá, Entropy 19, 486 (2017)
W.J. Murdoch, C. Singh, K. Kumbier, R. Abbasi-Asl, B. Yu, PNAS 116, 22071 (2019)
P. Ormerod, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 225, 3281 (2016)
G. Poitras, Physica A 507, 89 (2018)
S. Reddy, J. Ethics 9, 119(2005)
F. Reif, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics (Mc-Graw Hill, New York, 1965)
J. Robinson, History vs. Equilibrium, in Contributions to Modern Economics (Blackwell, Oxford, 1978)
J.B. Rosser, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 225, 17 (2016)
P.A. Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1947)
G. Semieniuk, E. Scharfenaker, Metroeconomica 68, 465 (2017)
A. Sen, Oxford Econ. Pap. 32, 353 (1980)
A. Sen, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 407, 3 (1986)
A. Sen, Soc. Res. 71, 583 (2004)
A. Shaikh, A. Ragab, An international comparison of the incomes of the vast majority, Working Paper, The New School, 2011
A. Shaikh, N. Papanikolau, N. Weiner, Physica A 415, 54 (2014)
A. Shaikh, Rev. Political Econ. 29, 1 (2017)
A. Shaikh, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 229, 1675 (2020)
A. Shaikh, Rethinking microeconomics: A proposed reconstruction, The New School Economics Department Working Paper 06/2012, 2012
B.F. Skinner, Beyond Freedom and Dignity (Knopf, New York, 1971)
R.M. Unger, Social Theory: Its Situation and Its Task, Volume 2 of Politics: A Work in Constructive Social Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987)
R.M. Unger, L. Smolin, The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time: A Proposal in Natural Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)
V. Venkatasubramanian, How Much Inequality is Fair (Columbia University Press, New York, 2017)
J.G. Williamson, J. Econ. History 62, 55 (2002)
E.O. Wilson, Sociobiology: A New Synthesis. 2nd ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000)
J. Woodward, Scientific explanation, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E.N. Zalta (2017), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/scientific-explanation/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reddy, S.G. What is an explanation? Statistical physics and economics. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 229, 1645–1659 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900262-y
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900262-y