Abstract
A regionalized relationship to estimate flood magnitudes for ungauged and poorly gauged catchments can be established using regional flood frequency analysis (RFFA). Comparison of index-flood and multiple-regression analyses based on L-moments was the main objective of this study. Factor analysis was applied to determine main variables influencing flood magnitude. Results showed that the main variables are perimeter, equivalent diameter, time of concentration, length of main waterway and area. The study area was divided into two regions based on the Ward’s method of clustering approach and site characteristics. The homogeneity test based on L-moments showed that two regions were acceptably homogeneous. Five distributions were fitted to the annual peak flood data of two homogeneous regions. Using the L-moment ratios and the Z-statistic criteria, generalized logistic (GLO) and generalized Pareto (GPA) distributions were identified for the first and second homogeneous regions respectively as the most robust distributions among five potential distributions. The relative root mean square error (RRMSE) measure was applied for evaluating the performance of the index-flood and the multiple-regression methods in comparison with the curve fitting (plotting position) method. In general, the index-flood method gives more reliable estimations for various flood magnitudes of different recurrence intervals.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Burn, D.H., Catchment similarity for regional flood frequency analysis using seasonality measures, J. Hydrol., 1997, vol. 202, nos. 1–4, pp. 212–230.
Chowdhury, J.U., Stedinger, J.R., and Lu, L.H., Goodness-of-fit tests for regional GEV flood distributions, Water Resour. Res., 1991, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1765–1776.
Cunnane, C., Methods and merits of regional flood frequency analysis, J. Hydrol., 1988, vol. 100, pp. 269–290.
Dalrymple, T., Flood frequency analyses. Water Supply Paper 1543-A, US Geological Survey, 1960, pp. 11–51.
Groupe de recherche en hydrologie statistique (GREHYS), Presentation and review of some methods for regional flood frequency analysis, J. Hydrol., 1996, vol. 186, nos. 1–4, pp. 63–84.
Groupe de recherche en hydrologie statistique (GREHYS), Inter-comparison of regional flood frequency procedures for Canadian rivers, J. Hydrol., 1996, vol. 186, nos. 1–4, pp. 85–103.
Heinz, D.F. and Stedinger, J.R., Using regional regression within index flood procedures and an empirical Bayesian estimator, J. Hydrol., 1998, vol. 210, pp. 128–145.
Hosking, J.R.M. and Wallis, J.R., Some statistics useful in regional frequency analysis, Water Resour. Res., 1993, vol. 29, pp. 271–278.
Hosking, J.R.M. and Wallis, J.R., Regional Frequency Analysis: An Approach Based on L-Moments, London: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997.
Hosking, J.R.M., L-Moments: Analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics, J. R. Statis. Soc., 1990, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 105–124.
Kjeldsen, T.R., Smithers, J.C., and Schulze, R.E., Regional flood frequency analysis in the KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa, using the index-flood method, J. Hydrol., 2002, vol. 255, nos. 1–4, pp. 194–211.
Malekinezhad, H., Nachtnebel, H.P., and Klik, A., Comparing the index-flood and multiple regression methods using L-moments, Phys. Chem. Earth, 2011, vol. 36, pp. 54–60.
Mkhandi, S. and Kachroo, S., Regional flood frequency analysis for Southern Africa. Southern African friend, Technical Documents in Hydrology no. 15, Paris: UNESCO, 1997.
Pandey, G.R. and Nguyen, V.T.V., A comparative study of regression based methods in regional flood frequency analysis, J. Hydrol., 1999, vol. 225, pp. 92–101.
Pilon, P.J. and Adamowski, K., The value of regional information to flood frequency analysis using the method of L-moments, Can. J. Civil Eng., 1992, vol. 19, pp. 137–147.
Saf, B., Regional flood frequency analysis using L-moments for the West Mediterranean region of Turkey, Water Resour. Manag., 2009, vol. 23, pp. 531–551.
Saf, B., Assessment of the effects of discordant sites on regional flood frequency analysis, J. Hydrol., 2010, vol. 380, pp. 362–375.
Singh, V.P., Wang, S.X., and Zhang, L., Frequency analysis of nonidentically distributed hydrologic flood data, J. Hydrol., 2005, vol. 307, pp. 175–195.
Vogel, R.M. and Fennessey, N.M., L-moments diagrams should replace product moment diagrams, Water Resour. Res., 1993, vol. 29, pp. 1745–1752.
Vogel, R.M., Thomas, W.O., and McMahon, T.A., Flood-flow frequency model selection in south-western United States, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 1993, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 353–366.
Vogel, R.M., McMahon, T.A., and Chiew, F.H.S., Floodflow frequency model selection in Australia, J. Hydrol., 1993, vol. 146, pp. 421–449.
Zhang, J. and Hall, M.J., Regional flood frequency analysis for the Gan-Ming River basin in China, J. Hydrol., 2004, vol. 296, pp. 98–117.
Zrinji, Z. and Burn, D.H., Flood frequency analysis for unguaged sites using a region of influence approach, J. Hydrol., 1994, vol. 153, pp. 1–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The article is published in the original.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mosaffaie, J. Comparison of two methods of regional flood frequency analysis by using L-moments. Water Resour 42, 313–321 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807815030112
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807815030112