Abstract
Using an organizational culture framework, this case study examines the critical preconditions necessary for employee empowerment and highlights how the multiple cultures within one public bureaucracy differently impacted their implementation. SERVE, a large human service organization, initiated an employee empowerment program that contradicted and thus collided with many elements of its overall organizational culture. Despite the best intentions of the organizational leaders, upper management support, and opportunities for participatory decision making, the organization could not foster the critical preconditions needed for employee empowerment. Leaders had difficulty expanding the employees' power and promoting member inclusion. Concurrently, most employees rejected these new opportunities for control and distrusted the leader's intentions. Yet, despite the widespread rejection of these empowerment initiatives, most employees described their work lives as empowering. The role the local site subculture played in promoting employee empowerment is examined. We discuss how a localized (vs. system-wide) empowerment endeavor may be a more appropriate and feasible focus for public bureaucracies seeking to initiate greater staff empowerment. Particular attention is paid to the interaction between individuals and their environments, and how this interaction affects the empowerment process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
REFERENCES
Argyris, C. (1971). Management and organization development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46, 681–703.
Ban, C. (1995). How do public managers manage? San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Bartunek, J. M., & Keys, C. B. (1979). Participation in school decision making. Urban Education, 14(1), 52–75.
Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organizational development interventions: A cognitive approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 483–500.
Block, P. (1987). The empowered manager. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Bond, M., & Keys, C. B. (1993). Empowerment, diversity, and collaboration: Promoting synergy on community boards. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 37–57.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471–482.
Cummings, T. G., & Molloy, E. (1977). Improving productivity and quality of work life. New York: Praeger.
Evered, R., & Louis, M. R. (1981). Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: “Inquiry from the inside” and “inquiry from the outside.” Academy of Management, 6, 385–395.
Fawcett, S. B., White, G. W., Balcazar, F. E., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Mathews, R. M., Paine-Andrews, A., Seekins, T., & Smith, J. F. (1994). A contextual-behavioral model of empowerment: Case studies involving people with physical disabilities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 471–496.
Florin, P., & Wandersman, A. (1990). An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community development: Insights for empowerment through research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 41–54.
Foster-Fishman, P. G., Salem, D. A., Chibnall, S., Legler, R., & Yapchai, C. (in press). Empirical support for the critical assumptions of empowerment theory. American Journal of Community Psychology.
French, J. R. P., Israel, J., & As, D. (1960). An experiment in participation in a Norwegian factory: Interpersonal dimensions of decision-making. Human Relations, 13, 3–20.
Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury.
Golembiewski, R. T. (1985). Humanizing public organizations. Mt Airy, MD: Lomond.
Goodstein, L., & Boyer, R. (1972). Crisis intervention in a municipal agency. A conceptual case study. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 8, 318–340.
Gore, A. (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less (A report of the National Performance Review). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Gruber, J., & Trickett, E. J. (1987). Can we empower others: The paradox of empowerment in the governing of an alternative public school. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 353–371.
Hollander, E. P., & Offerman, L. R. (1990). Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. American Psychologist, 45, 179–189.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Kelly, J. G. (1988). A guide to conducting prevention research in the community. New York: Haworth.
Ledford, G. E., Lawler, E. E., & Mohrman, S. A. (1988). The quality circle and its variations. In J. P. Campbell & Associates (Eds.), Productivity in organizations (pp. 225–294). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In New directions for program evaluation (Vol. 30, pp. 73–84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Locke, E. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Latham, G. P. (1986). Participation in decision making: When should it be used? Organizational Dynamics, 14, 65–79.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Organizational choice under ambiguity. In J. G. March & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), Ambiguity and choice in organizations (pp. 10–23). Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Maton, K. I., & Salem, D. A. (1995). Organizational characteristics of empowering community settings: A multiple case study approach. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 631–656.
Meyerson, D., & Martin, J. (1987). Cultural change: An integration of three different views. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 623–647.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Pacanowsky, M. (1988). Communicating in the empowering organization. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 11, pp. 356–379). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Perkins, D. D. (1995). Speaking truth to power: Empowerment ideology as social intervention and policy. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 765–794.
Przeworksi, A., & Teune, A. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley.
Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25.
Rappaport, J. (1995). Empowerment meets narrative: Listening to stories and creating settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 795–808.
Rich, R. C., Edelstein, M., Hallman, W. K., & Wandersman, A. H. (1995). Citizen participation and empowerment: The case of local environmental hazards. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 657–676.
Riger, S. (1984). Vehicles for empowerment: The case of feminist movement organizations. In J. Rappaport, C. Swift, & R. Hess (Eds.), Studies in empowerment: Steps toward understanding and action. New York: Haworth.
Riger, S. (1993). What's wrong with empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279–292.
Sackman, S. A. (1991). Cultural knowledge in organizations: Exploring the collective mind. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Serrano-Garcia, I. (1984). The illusion of empowerment: Community development within a colonial context. In J. Rappaport, C. Swift, & R. Hess (Eds.), Studies in empowerment: Steps toward understanding and action (pp. 9–35). New York: Haworth.
Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 28, 339–358.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). An empirical test of a comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 601–630.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666–681.
Weick, K. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39, 40–49.
Weick, K. (1985). Sources of order in underorganized systems: Themes in recent organizational theory. In Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Organizational theory and inquiry: The paradigm revolution. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Wilkins, A. L., & Dyer, W. G., Jr. (1988). Toward culturally sensitive theories of culture change. Academy of Management Review, 13, 522–533.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 169–177.
Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychology empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 581–600.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 725–750.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foster-Fishman, P.G., Keys, C.B. The Person/Environment Dynamics of Employee Empowerment: An Organizational Culture Analysis. Am J Community Psychol 25, 345–369 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024628711026
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024628711026