Skip to main content
Log in

The Revolt Against Cultural Authority: Power/Knowledge as an Assumption in Organization Theory

  • Published:
Human Relations

Abstract

Foucault-inspired organization theory hasinterpreted the Enlightenment effort to make reason thefoundation for human freedom as a failure. Reason isseen as developing into disciplinary knowledge, which dominates modern organizations and theindividuals who live and work in them. In fact, theindividual s very identity is the means by which theindividual is enslaved. Knowledge is thus seen asnowhere separate from power. In this essay, I will usea concept of traditional authority to examineFoucault-inspired organization theory and itspower/knowledge conceptual framework in terms of theirethical and cultural implications. This will includeFoucault s influence on both the literature in criticalorganization theory and postmodern organization theory.My approach will highlight the Foucault-inspired misinterpretation of the effect of theEnlightenment on modern organizations, its rejection ofthe authority of the past as a basis for moral order,and its impossible attempt to find freedom through the destruction of cultural authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • ALVESSON, M., & WILLMOTT, H. (Eds.). Critical management studies. London: Sage, 1992a.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALVESSON, M., & WILLMOTT, W. Critical theory and management studies. In M. Alvesson and H. Willmott (Eds.), Critical management studies. London: Sage, 1992b.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALVESSON, M., & WILLMOTT, H. On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 1992c 17( 3), 432–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARENDT, H. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Meridian Books, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARENDT, H. Between past and future. New York: Penguin Books, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • AUGUSTINE. The city of God. London: Penguin Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • BAUMAN, Z. Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • BELL, D. The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • BURKE, E. The philosoph y of Edmund Burke. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1791/1967.

  • BURRELL, G. Modernism, postmodernism, and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 1988, 9(2), 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • BURRELL, G. Eco & the Bunnyman. In J. Hassard & M. Parker (Eds.), Postmodernism and organization. London: Sage, pp. 71–82.

  • BURRELL, G. Modernism, postmodernism, and organizational analysis 4: The contribution of Jürgen Habermas. Organization Studies, 1994, 15(1), 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLEGG, S. Social theory for the study of organization: Weber & Foucault. Organization, 1995, 1(1), 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • COOPER, R., & BURRELL, G. Modernism, postmodernism, and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organization Studies, 1988, 9(1), 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • COOPER R. Modernism, postmodernism, and organizational analysis 3: The contribution of Jacque s Derrida. Organization Studies, 1989, 10(4), 479–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • DALTON, M. Men who manage. New York: Wiley, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEETZ, S. Disciplinary power in the modern corporation. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Critical management studies. London: Sage Publications, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEETZ, S. Character, corporate responsibility, and the dialogic in the postmodern context. Organization, 2(2), 217–225.

  • DILTHEY, W. Dilthey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1883/1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUMONT, L. Essays on individualism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • DURKHEIM, E. Moral education. New York: Free Press, 1922/1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELSHTAIN, J. Democracy on trial. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOUCAULT, M. Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREUD, S. Civilization and its discontents. New York: Norton, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • GERGEN, K. Organization theory in the postmodern era. In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organization. London: Sage, 1992, pp. 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • HABERMAS, J. Toward a rational society. London: Heinemann, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • HELLER, A. Existentialism, alienation, postmodernism: Cultural movements as vehicles of change in the patterns of everyday life. In J. Natol and L. Hutcheon, (Eds.), A postmodern reader. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993, pp. 497–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOSKIN, K., & MACVE, R. Accounting and the examination: A genealogy of disciplinary power. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 1986, 11(2), 105–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAMESON, F. Postmodernism on the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 1984.

  • KAUFMAN, W. Nietzsche. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • KNIGHTS, D., & COLLINSON, D. Disciplining the shopfloor: A comparison of the disciplinary effects of managerial psychology and financial accounting. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 1987, 12(5), 457–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • KNIGHTS, D., & VURDUBAKIS, T. Foucault, power, re sistance, and all that. In J. Jermier, D. Knights, & W. Nord (Eds.), Resistance and power in organizations, New York: Routledge, 1994, pp. 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • KNIGHTS, D., & WILLMOTT, H. Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology, 1989, 23(4): 535–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • LINSTEAD, S. & GRAFTON-SMALL, R. On reading organizational culture. Organization Studies, 1992, 13(3), 331–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacINTYRE, A. After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARSDEN, R., & TOWNLEY, B. Power and postmodernity: Reflections on the pleasure dome. Electronic Journal of Radical Organization Theory, November 1995.

  • MARX, K. Karl Marx early writings. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1843/1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • MASARYK, T. Constructive sociological theory. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCARTHY, T. Ideals and illusions. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • MINGERS, J. Technical, practical, and critical OR-past, present, and future? In M. Alvesson, & H. Willmott, (Eds.), Critical management studies. London: Sage, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • MINTZBERG, H. Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORGAN, G. Marketing discourse and practice: Towards a critical analysis. In M. Alvesson, & H. Willmott, (Eds.) Critical management studies. London: Sage, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIETZSCHE, F. Beyond good and evil. New York: Vintage Books, 1886/1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIETZSCHE, F. The gay science. New York: Vintage Books, 1887/1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'NEILL, J. Religion and postmodernism: the Durkheimian bond in Bell & Jameson. Theory, Culture, and Society, 1988, 5, 493–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARKER, M. Postmodern organizations on postmodern organization theory. Organization Studies, 1992, 13(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • PFEFFER, J. Power in organizations. Marshall, MA: Pitman Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • POWER, M. Modernism, postmodernism, and organization. In J. Hassard & D. Pym (Eds.), The theory and philosophy of organizations. London: Routledge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • REED, M. Organizations and modernity: Continuity and discontinuity in organization theory. In J. Hassard & M. Parker (Eds.), Postmodernism and organization. London: Sage, 1993, pp. 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIEFF, P. Freud: The mind of the moralist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIEFF, P. Fellow teachers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIEFF, P. The triumph of the therapeutic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIESMAN, D. The lonely crowd. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHLUCHTER, W. The rise of Western rationalism. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCOTT, W. G. Chester I. Barnard and the guardians of the managerial state. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • SELZNICK, P. The moral commonwealth. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • STAUTH, G., & TURNER, B. Nostalgia, postmodernism, and the critique of mass culture. Theory, Culture, and Society, 1988, 5, 509–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEFFY, B., & GRIMES, A. Personnel/organization psychology: A critique of the discipline. In M. Alvesson, & H. Willmott, (Eds.), Critical management studies, London: Sage, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • STIVERS, R. The culture of cynicism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAWNEY, R. H. Religion and the rise of capitalism. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYLOR, C. Foucault on freedom and truth. Political Theory, 1984, 12(2), 152–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, P. Postmodernism: fatal distraction. In J. Hassard & M. Parker (Eds.), Postmodernism and organization. London: Sage, 1993, pp. 183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOCQUEVILLE, A. Democracy in America. New York: Anchor Books, 1848/1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOWNLEY, B. Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18(3), 518–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • TROELTSCH, E. The social teaching of the Christian churches. Louisville, KY: Westminister/ John Knox Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEBER, M. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Charles Scribners, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEBER, M. Religious rejections of the world and their directions. In From Max Weber. London: Routledge, 1915/1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILLMOTT, H. Bringing agency back into organizational analysis: Responding to the crisis of postmodernity. In J. Hassard & M. Parker (Eds.), Toward a new theory of organization. London: Routledge, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • WINNICOTT, D. W. Playing and reality. London: Tavistock, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feldman, S.P. The Revolt Against Cultural Authority: Power/Knowledge as an Assumption in Organization Theory. Human Relations 50, 937–955 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016924810449

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016924810449

Navigation