Abstract
Women scientists in academia have been shown to be less geographically mobile than their male counterparts, a factor that may exacerbate gender inequities in faculty representation, tenure, and salary. This study examines the extent to which the jobs of academic women scientists are disproportionately concentrated in large cities, areas with many colleges and universities, and regions where most doctorates are granted. We also investigate whether jobs in these locations affect salary, tenure, full-time faculty status, and employment outside one's field of training in ways that differ for women and men. Our analysis is guided by arguments that geographic constraints on women's mobility are rooted in social factors, such as gender roles and mate selection patterns. Data are drawn from over 13,000 faculty respondents in the national Survey of Doctoral Recipients, representing 22 science and engineering disciplines and over 1,000 4-year colleges or universities. Regression analysis reveals that, irrespective of their family status, women faculty are more likely than their male counterparts to reside in doctoral production centers, areas with large clusters of colleges, and large cities. Responsibility for children intensifies women's geographic concentration more than marriage does and in ways that differ from men. Geographic concentration also appears generally more harmful to women's careers than to men's. Women in doctoral production centers are less likely to have tenure and more likely to work part time; those in larger cities are more likely to be in jobs off the tenure track. Locales with many colleges appear to present somewhat better career prospects for women.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
REFERENCES
Astin, A. W., Korn, W. S., and Dey, E. L. (1991). The American College Teacher: National Norms for the 1989-90 HERI Faculty Survey. Los Angeles: UCLA Higher Education Research Institute.
Astin, H. S., and Davis, D. E. (1985). Research productivity across the life and career cycles: facilitators and barriers for women. In M. F. Fox (ed.), Scholarly Writing and Publishing: Issues, Problems, and Solutions, pp.147-160. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Astin, H. S., and Milem, J. F. (1997). The status of academic couples in U.S. institutions. In M. A. Ferber and J. W. Loeb (eds.), Academic Couples: Problems and Promises, pp. 128-155. Urbana: University of Illinois.
Bellas, M. L. (1997). The scholarly productivity of academic couples. In M. A. Ferber and J. W. Loeb (eds.), Academic Couples: Problems and Promises, pp. 156-181. Urbana: University of Illinois.
Bielby, W. T., and Bielby, D. D. (1992). I will follow him: family ties, gender role beliefs, and reluctance to relocate for a better job. American Journal of Sociology 97: 1241-1267.
Brooker-Gross, S. R., and Maraffa, T. A. (1989). Faculty spouses: their post-migration searches. Initiatives 52(2): 37-43.
Campbell, C. E. (1988). Gender differences in job-related networks. Work and Occupations 15: 179-200.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1987).A Classification of Higher Educational Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Author.
Clark, S. M., and Corcoran, M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty. Journal of Higher Education 57: 20-43.
Cole, J. R., and Zuckerman, H. (1987). Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science. Scientific American 255: 119-125.
Cooney, T. M. and Uhlenberg, P. (1991). Changes in work-family connections among highly educated men and women 1970 to 1980. Journal of Family Issues 12(1): 69-90.
Ferber, M. A., and Hoffman, E. P. (1997). Are academic partners at a disadvantage? In M. A. Ferber and J. W. Loeb (eds.), Academic Couples: Problems and Promises, pp. 182-203. Urbana: University of Illinois.
Ferber, M. A., and Huber, J. H. (1979). Husbands, wives and careers. Journal of Marriage and the Family 41(3): 315-326.
Fields, J. P., and Erkut, S. (1983). Relocation as nemesis: a study of black and white dual career couples. Wellesley College Center for Research on Women, Working Paper no. 100.
Fox, M. F. (1985). Publication, performance, and reward in science and scholarship. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, pp. 255-282. New York: Agathon Press.
Gibbons, A. (1972). Two-career science marriage. Science 255: 1380-1381.
Goldin, C. (1992). The meaning of college in the lives of American women: The past one hundred years. NBER Working Paper no. 4099.
Hargens, L. L. (1969). Patterns of mobility of new Ph.D.s among American institutions. Sociology of Education 42: 247-256.
Hendershott, A. B. (1995). Moving for Work: The Sociology of Relocating in the 1990s. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Huber, J., and Spitze, G. (1983). Sex Stratification: Children, Housework, and Jobs. New York: Academic Press.
Kotkin, M. (1983). Sex role among married and unmarried couples. Sex Roles 9: 975-985.
Kulis, S. (1997). Gender segregation among college and university employees. Sociology of Education 70: 153-175.
Lester, R. A. (1974). Antibias Regulation of Universities: Faculty Problems and Their Solutions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Marwell, G., Rosenfeld, R., and Spilerman, S. (1979). Geographic constraints on women's careers in academia. Science 205: 1225-1231.
McElrath, K. (1992). Gender, career disruption, and academic rewards. Journal of Higher Education 63: 269-281.
McGinnis, R., and Long, J. S. (1988). Entry into academia: effects of stratification, geography and ecology. In D. W. Breneman and T. I. Youn (eds.), Academic Labor Markets and Careers, pp. 28-51. New York: Falmer Press.
Michelson, W. (1985). From Sun to Sun: Daily Obligations and Community Structure in the Lives of Employed Women and Their Families. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
Miller, D. C., and Skeen, A. (1997). PSSLQs and PSSSLQs. In M. A. Ferber and J. W. Loeb (eds.), Academic Couples: Problems and Promises, pp. 106-127. Urbana: University of Illinois.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1977). The sociology of women's economic role in the family. American Sociological Review 42: 387-406.
Perkins, L. M. (1997). For the good of the race. In M. A. Ferber and J. W. Loeb (eds.), Academic Couples: Problems and Promises, pp. 80-105. Urbana: University of Illinois.
Qian, Z., and Preston, S. (1993). Changes in American marriage, 1972-1987. American Sociological Review 58: 482-495.
Rosenblum, G., and Rosenblum, B. R. (1990). Segmented labor markets in institutions of higher learning. Sociology of Education 63: 151-164.
Rosenfeld, R., and Jones, J. A. (1987). Patterns of effects of geographic mobility for academic women and men. Journal of Higher Education 58: 493-515.
Shauman, K. A., and Xie, Y. (1996). Geographic mobility of scientists: sex differences and family constraints. Demography 33(4): 455-468.
Shihadeh, E. S. (1991). The prevalence of husband-centered migration: employment consequences for married mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family 53: 432-444.
Sowell, T. (1975). Affirmative Action Reconsidered: Was It Necessary in Academe? Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Stephan, P. E. and Kassis, M. M. (1997). The history of women and couples in academia. In M. A. Ferber and J. W. Loeb (eds.), Academic Couples: Problems and Promises, pp. 44-79. Urbana: University of Illinois.
Vanek, J. (1980). Household work, wage work, and sexual equality. In S. F. Berk (ed.), Women and Household Labor, pp. 275-291. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Weishaar, M., Chiaravalli, K., and Jones, F. (1984). Dual career couples in higher education. Journal of NAWDAC 47: 16-20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulis, S., Sicotte, D. Women Scientists in Academia: Geographically Constrained to Big Cities, College Clusters, or the Coasts?. Research in Higher Education 43, 1–30 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013097716317
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013097716317