Abstract
The crystallization and melting of three model polyethylenes of different chain structures have been studied. The polymers studied were a linear copolymer, hydrogenated poly(butadiene); a hydrogenated poly(butadiene)-atactic poly(propylene) diblock copolymer; and a three-arm star hydrogenated poly(butadiene). An important feature of this work was that the crystallizing portions of the copolymers all have the same molecular lengths.
It was found that the overall crystallization rate decreases steadily from a linear to a diblock to the star copolymer. The differences in crystallization rates are related primarily to the activation energy for segmental transport. The non-crystallizable structure affects the segmental mobility to different degrees. An estimation of this effect is presented from the analysis of the overall crystallization rates using classical nucleation theory. In spite of thedifferences in their molecular structure, there are no major differences in the supermolecular structure of samples crystallized rapidly or slowly cooled.
The melting process followed by DSC of the isothermally crystallized linear and star copolymers shows two endothermic peaks at intermediate undercoolings. The double melting is associated with a partitioning of crystallizable ethylene sequences during crystallization. The longest sequences are preferentially selected in the early stages of the crystallization. Single melting peaks are obtained for high and very low undercoolings for the linear and the star copolymers as well as for the diblock in the whole range of temperatures. The lack of the second, lower melting endotherm in the diblock could be associated with the influence in the crystallization process of the amorphous block in the microphase segregated melt.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. A. Miller, Ed., Ethylene and Its Industrial Derivatives. Ernest Been Limited, London 1969.
L. Mandelkern, R. G. Alamo, G. D. Wignall and F. C. Stehling, Trends in Polymer Science, 4 (1996) 377.
R. G. Alamo and L. Mandelkern, Thermochim. Acta, 238 (1994) 155.
I. G. Voigt-Martin, R. Alamo and L. Mandelkern, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed., 24 (1986) 1283.
S. Bensason, J. Minick, A. Moet and E. Baer, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys., 34 (1996) 1301.
L. Mandelkern, M. Glotin and R. S. Benson, Macromolecules, 14 (1981) 22.
F. Chowdhury, J. A. Haigh, L. Mandelkern and R. G. Alamo, Polymer Bulletin, 41 (1998) 463.
R. G. Alamo and L. Mandelkern, Macromolecules, 22 (1989) 1273.
R. G. Alamo, B. D. Viers and L. Mandelkern, Macromolecules, 26 (1993) 5740.
H. Rachapudy, G. G. Smith, V. R. Raju and W. W. Graessley, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed., 17 (1979) 1211.
Z. Xu, J. W. Mays ansd X. Chen, N. Hadjichristidis, N. F. Schelling, H. E. Blair, D. S. Pearson and L. Fetters, Macromolecules, 18 (1985) 2560.
K. Sakurai, W. J. MacKnight, D. J. Lohse, D. N. Schulz and J. A. Sissano, Macromolecules, 27 (1994) 4941.
F. A. Quinn, Jr. and L. Mandelkern, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 80 (1958) 3178.
M. J. Galante, L. Mandelkern, R. G. Alamo, A. Lehtinen and R. Paukkeri, J. Thermal Anal., 47 (1996) 913.
J. G. Fatou and L. Mandelkern, J. Phys. Chem., 69 (1965) 417.
R. Chiang and P. J. Flory, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 83 (1961) 2857.
J. Maxfield and L. Mandelkern, Macromolecules, 10 (1977) 1141.
R. G. Alamo and L. Mandelkern, Macromolecules, 24 (1991) 6480.
D. Turnbull and J. C. Fischer, J. Chem. Phys., 17 (1949) 71.
L. Mandelkern, J. G. Fatou and C. Howard, J. Phys. Chem., 68 (1964) 3386.
L. Mandelkern, J. G. Fatou and C. Howard, J. Phys. Chem., 69 (1965) 956.
L. Mandelkern, N. L. Jain and H. Kim, J. Polym. Sci. A-2, 6 (1968) 165.
N. Okui, in Crystallization of Polymers, NATO ASI Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, M. Dosière, Ed., Kluwer Acad. Pub., 1995, p. 593.
P. J. Flory and A. Vrij, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 85 (1963) 3548.
R. Alamo, R. Domszy and L. Mandelkern, J. Phys. Chem., 88 (1984) 6587.
S.-D. Clas, R. D. Heyding, D. C. McFaddin, K. E. Russell, M. V. Scammell-Bullock, E. C. Kelusky and D. St-Cyr, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed., 26 (1988) 1271.
M. Glotin and L. Mandelkern, Colloid. Polym. Sci., 260 (1982) 182.
L. Mandelkern, Chemtracts-Macromolecular Chemistry, 3 (1992) 347.
J. R. Isasi, L. Mandelkern, M. J. Galante and R. G. Alamo, J. Polym. Sci., Ed. Part B: Polym. Phys., 37 (1999) 323.
M. Glotin and L. Mandelkern, Macromolecules, 14 (1981) 1394.
R.G. Alamo, L. Lu and L. Mandelkern, Polym. Preprints, 35 (1994) 410.
B. Crist and D. N. Williams, J. Macromol Sci. Phys., 1999, in press.
The single phase melt diblock studied was sample 30/78 listed in Table 1 of reference [34]. It is a hydrogenated poly (butadiene) hydrogenated 1, 4-isoprene diblock copolymer.
P. Rangarajan, R. A. Register and L. J. Fetters, Macromolecules, 26 (1993) 4640.
R. G. Alamo, E. K. M. Chan, L. Mandelkern and I. G. Voigt-Martin, Macromolecules, 25 (1992) 6381.
J. D. Hoffman and J. J. Weeks, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Part A, 66 (1962) 13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haigh, J.A., Nguyen, C., Alamo, R.G. et al. Crystallization and Melting of Model Polyethylenes with Different Chain Structures. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 59, 435–450 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010105126071
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010105126071