Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of Outcome of Dream Interpretation Sessions: Volunteer Client Characteristics, Dream Characteristics, and Type of Interpretation

  • Published:
Dreaming

Abstract

105 volunteer clients completed single sessions of dream interpretation using the Hill (1996) model, with half randomly assigned to waking life interpretation and the other half to parts of self interpretation in the insight stage of the Hill model. No differences were found between waking life and parts of self interpretations, suggesting that therapists can use either type of dream interpretation. Volunteer clients who had positive attitudes toward dreams and presented pleasant dreams had better session outcome; in addition, volunteer clients who had pleasant dreams gained more insight into their dreams. Results suggest that therapists doing single sessions of dream interpretation need to be cautious about working with dreams when volunteer clients have negative attitudes toward dreams and present unpleasant dreams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernovsky, Z. Z. (1984). Dream recall and attitudes towards dreams. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 911-914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogar, M. M., & Hill, C. E. (1992). Examining the effects of brief individual dream interpretation. Dreaming, 2, 239-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO-Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. L., & Hill, C. E. (2001). Including spirituality into the Hill cognitive-experiential model of dream interpretation. In L. VandeCreek & T. L. Jackson (Ed.), Innovations in Clinical Practice: A source book. (Vol. 19, pp. 79-94). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diemer, R. A., Lobell, L. K., Vivino, B. L, & Hill, C. E. (1996). Comparison of dream interpretation, event interpretation, and unstructured sessions in brief therapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 99-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R., & Wexler, M.M. (1994). Measuring the impact of sessions: in process-experiential therapy of depression: The Session Impacts Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 166-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D. R., & Hill, C. E. (1995). The process and outcome of dream interpretation groups for divorcing women. Dreaming, 5, 29-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, K. J., Hill, C. E., Hess, S., Hoffman, M. A., & Leotta, C. (1998). Assimilation in therapy involving interpretation of recurrent and nonrecurrent dreams. Psychotherapy, 35, 147-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, K. J., Hill, C. E., & Petersen, D., Rochlen, A. B., & Zack, J. (1998). A comparison of therapist-facilitated and self-guided dream interpretation sessions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 115-121.

  • Hill, C. E. (1996). Working with dreams in psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Corbett, M. M., Kanitz, B., Rios, P., Lightsey, R., & Gomez, M. (1992). Client behavior in counseling and therapy sessions: Development of a pantheoretical measure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 539-549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Diemer, R., & Heaton, K. J. (1997). Dream interpretation sessions: Who volunteers, who benefits, and what volunteer clients view as most and least helpful. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 53-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Diemer, R., Hess, S., Hillyer, A., & Seeman, R. (1993). Are the effects of dream interpretation on session quality, insight, and emotions due to the dream itself, to projection, or to the interpretation process? Dreaming, 3, 269-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Nakayama, E. Y., & Wonnell, T. L. (1998). A comparison of description, association, and combined description/association in exploring dream images. Dreaming, 8, 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Zack, J., Wonnell, T., Hoffman, M. A., Rochlen, A., Goldberg, J., Nakayama, E., Heaton, K. J., Kelley, F., Eiche, K., Tomlinson, M., & Hess, S. (2000). Structured brief therapy with a focus on dreams or loss for clients with troubling dreams and recent loss. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 90-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1974). Dreams (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolchakian, M., & Hill, C. E. (2000). A cognitive-experiential model of dream interpretation for couples. In L. VandeCreek & T. L. Jackson (Ed.), Innovations in Clinical Practice, 18, 85-101.

  • Kolden, G. C. (1991). The generic model of psychotherapy: An empirical investigation of patterns of process and outcome relationships. Psychotherapy Research, 1, 62-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30, 261-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1975). Varieties of psychotherapy experience. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perls, F. (1970). Dream seminars. In J. F. Shepherd and I. L. Shepherd (Ed.), Gestalt therapy now. New York: Harper Colophon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P. R., & Tanck, R. H. (1988). Interest in dreams and dream recall. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 291-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochlen, A., Ligiero, D., Hill, C. E., & Heaton, K. Preparation for dreamwork: Training for dream recall and dream interpretation. (In press). Journal of Counseling Psychology

  • Russell, J. A. (1978). Evidence of convergent validity on the dimensions of affect. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 36, 1152-1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B., & Snow, J. S. (1984). Dimensions of psychotherapy impact as viewed by novice counselors and their clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 3-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonnell, T., & Hill, C. E. (2000). Effects of including the action stage in dream interpretation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 372-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zack, J., & Hill, C. E. (1998). Predicting dream interpretation outcome by attitudes, stress, and emotion. Dreaming, 8, 169-185.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, C.E., Kelley, F.A., Davis, T.L. et al. Predictors of Outcome of Dream Interpretation Sessions: Volunteer Client Characteristics, Dream Characteristics, and Type of Interpretation. Dreaming 11, 53–72 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009420619940

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009420619940

Navigation