Abstract
The indentation hardness and elastic modulus of leadframe materials that consist of Cu alloy substrate and Ni/Pd bi-layer films of differing thicknesses are characterised using the micro-hardness and nano-indentation tests. The ‘true’ hardness of the individual substrate and film layers is evaluated based on the empirical relationship between the measured ‘composite’ hardness and the volume of plastically deformed material of film layers. It is found that the composite hardness determined from the nano-indentation test increases rapidly toward a peak at extremely low indentation depth of less than about 20–30 μm for all materials studied, due mainly to the finite value of the indenter tip radius and the rough surface of the specimen on the nano-scale. The composite hardness for the coated specimens decreases with further increasing indentation depth toward the hardness value of the substrate, because of the strong influence of the film/substrate interaction and the indentation size effect. The nano-indentation test in general gives higher true hardness values than those obtained from the micro-hardness test. Nevertheless, the relative hardness values of the substrate and films determined from the two tests are consistent. The hardness of Ni film is about 20 to 50% greater than that of Cu alloy, whereas the hardness of Pd film is 7 to 11 times the Ni film in the nano-indentation test.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
P. T. Vianco, Circuit World 25 (1998) 6.
D. L. Joslin and W. C. Oliver, J. Mater. Res. 5 (1990) 123.
K. L. Dahm, W. G. Ferguson, R. Murakami and P. A. Dearnley, Surface Eng. 10 (1994) 199.
P. J. Burnett and D. S. Rickerby, Thin Solid Films 148 (1987) 41.
H. BÑckle, in “The Science of Hardness Testing and its Research Application,” edited by J. W. Westbrook and H. Conrad (American Society for Metal, Metals Park, OH, 1973) p. 453.
B. D. Fabes, W. C. Oliver, R. A. Mckee and F. J. Walker, J. Mater. Res. 7 (1992) 3056.
J. B. Pethica, R. Hutchings and W. C. Oliver, Phil. Mag. A 48 (1983) 593.
B. JÖnsson and S. Hogmark, Thin Solid Films 114 (1984) 257.
F. E. Kennedy and F. F. Ling, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 95 (1974) 97.
A. K. Bhattacharya and W. D. Nix, Int. J. Solids Struct. 24 (1988) 1287.
A. K. Bhattacharya, ibid. 24 (1988) 881.
P. M. Sargent, ASTM SPT 889, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, p. 160.
B. D. Fabes and W. C. Oliver, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 188, 127.
W. H. Poisl, B. D. Fabes and W. C. Oliver, ibid. 308, 201.
O. Vingsbo, S. Hogmark, B. JÖnsson and A. Ingemarsson, ASTM STP 889, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, p. 257.
G. M. Pharr and W. C. Oliver, MRS Bull. 7 (1992) 28.
D. R. Kelly, C. E. Johnson and D. S. Lashmore, ASTM STP 889, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, p. 186.
H. M. Pollock, D. Maugis and M. Barquins, ASTM STP 889, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, p. 47.
C. J. Lu and D. B. Bogy, Int. J. Solids Struct. 32 (1995) 1759.
G. P. Upit and A. Varchienya, “The Science of Hardness testing and Its Research Applications” (American Society of Metals, Metal Park, OH, 1971) p. 135.
D. Tabor, Review of Physics in Technology. 1, 1970, p. 145.
C. J. Lu, D. B. Bogy and R. Kaneko, ASME Trans. J. Tribol. 116 (1994) 175.
R. J. Ptacek and D. E. Schuder, in Proc. 5th Ann. Intern. Electronics Packaging Society Conf., Orlando, FL, 1985.
M. F. Doner and W. D. Nix, J. Mater. Res. 1 (1986) 601.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, JK., Kim, DH. & Hwang, P. Hardness of bi-layer films on a leadframe substrate. Journal of Materials Science 35, 4185–4192 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004827530244
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004827530244