Abstract
Purpose of Review
Increase in the global prevalence of cannabis use has drawn attention to its predictors and psychosocial outcomes. Romantic relationships play a role in psychological well-being, yet data on the bidirectional association between cannabis use and romantic relationships is scarce and inconsistent. This paper aims to review existing literature and gaps in knowledge regarding this association.
Recent Findings
Over time, cannabis use may negatively affect the outcome of romantic relationships, and vice-versa. Recent methodological advances have suggested that on the one hand, concordance in cannabis use may be associated with decreased conflict and an increased sense of intimacy. On the other hand, cannabis users may perceive their communication as more positive compared to independent raters’ evaluation.
Summary
Several factors may contribute to these conflicting results and should be further explored, including the intensity of cannabis use, gender, age, and the effect of cannabis use on motivation and cognition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Why Cannabis and Romantic Relationships?
Following caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol, cannabis is the most commonly used psychoactive substance globally, with an estimated 200 million individuals, equivalent to over 4% of the world’s population, who used cannabis in 2021 [1]. Among cannabis users, roughly 15% report using cannabis frequently, commonly defined as ≥ 10 days during the past month [2, 3]. Frequent cannabis use has been associated with increased risk for several negative consequences, including direct physical harm, fatal vehicle crashes, psychiatric comorbidity, cognitive deficits, and cannabis use disorder (CUD) [4,5,6,7,8]. In recent years, the recreational use of cannabis has been legalized in several countries, including Canada and Uruguay, as well as several US states, while other countries have adopted a decriminalization policy. Due to the global increase in the prevalence of cannabis use and changes in its legal status, there is growing interest in the effect of cannabis use on additional aspects of psychosocial functioning, including romantic relationships [9], as well as the role of such factors in predicting cannabis use [10].
Romantic Relationships, Cannabis Use, and Emotions
There are various definitions of a romantic relationship, yet it is generally agreed upon that such relationships include reciprocal intimacy, passion, and commitment. Studies have shown the importance of romantic relationship quality in one’s overall well-being [11], suggesting that healthy relationship functioning contributes to mental and physical health, self-esteem, safety, life satisfaction, positive affect, and achieving personal and relational goals [12, 13]. In contrast, difficulties in romantic relationships may lead to negative consequences such as depression, anxiety, violence, and substance use [11, 14].
One aspect of a significant romantic relationship that may be affected by cannabis use is intimacy [15•, 16]. Intimacy is often defined as feelings between partners that promote bondedness, connection, and closeness in the relationship. It is commonly agreed that romantic intimacy requires emotional exposure and a suitable emotional response to such exposure [16]. The effects of cannabis use on emotional responsiveness vary, depending on motives for use, context, and level of intoxication, ranging from enhanced openness-to-experience to elevated emotional avoidance. On the one hand, cannabis use may enhance openness, which allows attentiveness to one’s own and others’ emotions, both positive and negative [17]. A study by Testa et al. [15•] pointed out the positive effect of cannabis use on intimate experiences. Analyzing daily dyadic reports on intensity of cannabis use and sense of intimacy using the actor partner interdependence model (APIM), researchers have suggested that in cases when both partners use cannabis simultaneously (at the same hour) or when one of them uses cannabis in the presence of the other, the experience of intimacy increases between both partners in the following hours. On the other hand, cannabis use may elevate emotional avoidance, defined as a maladaptive effort to control or avoid negative emotions as a coping strategy [18]. A study by Haydon and Salvatore [19••], which analyzed lab-based couple interactions, indicated that high frequency of cannabis use was associated with conflict avoidance behaviors, such as skirting, deflecting, or ignoring areas of disagreement.
The Effect of Cannabis Use on Romantic Relationships
Large-scale surveys allow permit exploration of the longitudinal association between cannabis use, marriage, and divorce. Several studies have suggested that adolescent frequent or dependent cannabis users were less likely to be in a steady romantic relationship as adults compared to non-users or non-frequent cannabis users [20,21,22]. In a nationally representative sample of American adults, individuals with anxiety disorders who used cannabis and those diagnosed with CUD were at an increased risk for termination of romantic relationships compared to non-users [23]. It thus appears that frequent, dependent, or early-onset cannabis use may result in a persistent, however small, effect on the odds for obtaining and maintaining a steady intimate relationship. However, due to methodological shortcomings, the specific and causal nature of this effect is far from clear [24]. For example, the bivariate correlation between cannabis use and divorce was non-significant when taking into account covariates such as frequency of alcohol and tobacco use [25].
In contrast to epidemiological studies, which often address gross behavioral outcome measures, couple-functioning studies enable us to explore the effect of substance use on more subtle aspects of romantic relationships, such as satisfaction, intimacy, and responsiveness [9]. With alcohol being at the center of attention [26], the literature on couple functioning among cannabis users is scarce. Several longitudinal studies have indicated that individuals who used cannabis in their early 20s, particularly heavy users, tended to express less satisfaction with their partner and report less marital harmony during their late 20s [20]. However, these studies suffered from similar methodological drawbacks, preventing determination of directionality and causality. In a longitudinal study, level of cannabis use did not predict future quality of intimate partner relationship, after controlling for covariates such as adolescent depression and family socioeconomic status [27]. Clearly, a main limitation of these studies was related to the fact that cannabis use was not assessed within the context of intimate relationships, but rather as an antecedent which may be irrelevant at the time of the relationship.
Several studies explored the effect of cannabis use within the context of intimate relationships. Two early studies conducted among married couples indicated that cannabis use (while married) was associated with an increased risk for divorce, for men and women alike [28, 29]. While these findings do support the notion that cannabis use may be deleterious to intimate relationships, they do not address specific aspects of relationship quality and do not offer any insight into the process by which cannabis use may lead to relationship outcomes.
Notably, discrepancy in patterns of substance use may be a better predictor of intimate relationship quality than substance use per se [30]. That is, higher concordance in frequency of substance use (i.e., when both partners are non-users or frequent users) may serve as a protective factor for intimate relationships, while discrepant substance use (when one partner is a non-user and the other a frequent user) may predict problems in intimate relationships. In a study among moderate-to-heavy alcohol-using romantic partners, four independent raters coded a 15-min conflict resolution task. Neither partner was under cannabis intoxication at the time of interaction, yet both were classified according to frequency of past-year cannabis use. Discrepant couples were rated as exhibiting poorer relationship quality and expressing more anger, more demand-withdrawal, and less constructiveness in their conflict resolution compared to concordant couples [31].
Another study focused on a community sample of newly wedded couples. Even though the researcher analyzed all types of drugs together, cannabis was the most predominant drug used. Results indicated that initial relationship satisfaction at baseline was significantly lower among discrepant compared to concordant couples. However, no significant differences were observed in change of relationship satisfaction over time, which was steadily decreasing among concordant, discrepant and non-using couples alike [32]. In a study by Crane et al. [31], researchers examined the effect of discrepancy in cannabis use on couples’ interaction through self-reports and systematic observations. In this study, participants were recorded in a 15-min conflict resolution task. Subsequently, they completed ratings of the interaction, and four independent observers coded the recorded interactions. Results show that coders rated discordant cannabis use couples as expressing more anger, demand-withdrawal, less open, honest, and respectful exchange, and poorer self-reported relationship satisfaction relative to couples with concordant use or non-use. In addition, participants’ self-report post-interaction anger and satisfaction ratings corresponded to this pattern finding.
More recently, Testa et al. [33•] studied the effect of heavy cannabis use on romantic relationships in a sample of heterosexual couples (ages 18–30) in which at least one partner reported using cannabis two or more times per week. In this study, relationship functioning was poorer at times when absolute discrepancy in cannabis use was greater than typical for the couple. A subsequent study which used an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methodology indicated that using cannabis at the same time as or in the presence of one’s partner positively affects subjective experience of intimacy, love, caring, or support during 1–3 h following cannabis use [15•]. In addition, a recent study used dyadic analyses to explore the association between cannabis use and romantic relationship quality among cohabiting couples and reported no significant correlations [19••].
Haydon and Salvatore [19••] compared couples’ self-reports regarding their satisfaction with couple interaction and independent raters’ coding of this interaction. According to raters’ coding, frequent cannabis use was associated with more demand, criticism, blaming, and avoidant behavior during conflict. In contrast, analyzing participants’ self-reports, more frequent cannabis use was associated with greater satisfaction with conflict resolution.
Beyond the effects of substance use concordance, studies on alcohol use pointed out the intertwining effect of substance use intensity on relationship quality. For instance, partners who drink concordantly at low to moderate alcohol consumption (measured by quantity of daily alcohol intake and intoxication level) report more intimacy, whereas heavier concordant drinking partners report decreased intimacy [34]. In addition, concordant heavy drinking is associated with a higher risk of marital dissolution than concordant light drinking. Furthermore, the risk for divorce was approximately the same between heavily drinking concordant couples and discordant couples where only the husband drank heavily [35]. These findings indicate that concordance may not be sufficient for assessing the effect of couple substance use on relationship outcomes, and it is also essential to address the intensity of use. However, up to date, this intensity-by-concordance interaction on romantic relationships has not been studied in the context of cannabis use and CUD symptoms.
The Effect of Romantic Relationship on Cannabis Use
Evidence on the inverse effect of relationship functioning on substance use stems primarily from studies on alcohol users, as evidence concerning cannabis use is scarce. Heavier alcohol use is reported among couples who display greater hostility during conflict [36] and those who report intimate partner aggression [37, 38]. On a similar note, Blumenstock and Papp [39] reported that romantic relationships which were characterized by high levels of support exhibited lower cannabis use frequency.
Another study explored the effect of relationship quality on the prevalence of cannabis use in a one-year follow-up study among participants aged 19–23, who were involved with the criminal justice system at baseline. The quality of romantic relationships was assessed by specific relationship aspects, such as monitoring (partner’s awareness of his spouse), and partner’s anti-social behaviors. A negative longitudinal association was found between monitoring and lower levels of cannabis use over time, so that among couples who were in a relationship one year later, individuals whose partners were more aware of their behavior were more likely to use cannabis at a lower frequency. In contrast, a positive association was found between the partner’s anti-social behavior and the participant’s cannabis use among couples who were no longer in a relationship, so individuals who were exposed to their partner’s anti-social behaviors in a relationship, such as damaged property, were using cannabis at a high frequency one year later when they were no longer in a relationship [40].
It has been repeatedly suggested that individuals who experience negative emotions in a social context are highly prone to use cannabis as a means of ‘self-medication’ for their distress [41,42,43]. Therefore, additional longitudinal studies are needed to further explore the effect of relationship perception and quality of dyadic interactions on future initiation and escalation of cannabis use, as well as onset of CUD.
Cannabis Use and Romantic Relationships: Gaps in Knowledge
-
1.
Cannabis use vs. clinical CUD in romantic relationships
Notably, only few studies compared psychosocial outcomes and consequences between regular cannabis users and those with CUD [44, 45]. For example, a study among adolescents indicated that individuals with CUD report more parent–child relationship problems, more antisocial, and fewer prosocial peers compared to non-CUD cannabis users [45]. However, to our knowledge, no study has examined the differences between these groups in the context of romantic relationships.
It may well be that the effects of CUD on romantic relationship differ from those of frequent cannabis use per-se. For example, while intensive cannabis use generally infers frequent intoxication that may affect romantic relationships, individuals with CUD additionally suffer from symptoms such as compulsive drug seeking, psychological dependence, and severe cannabis-related functional impairments, all may be deleterious to romantic relationships [46, 47]. Therefore, it is important to further investigate this gap due to the unique clinical and functional characteristics of each phenomenon.
-
2.
Better understanding of underlying mechanisms
In a recent review, Derrick et al. [9] concluded that despite the emerging evidence on the intertwining association between substance use and intimate relationships, it lacks theoretical models that account for these effects. It is yet unclear what the underlying mechanism of cannabis' effect on relationship quality is and vice versa. The following topics should be further explored:
-
i.
The interaction of cannabis use with mechanisms within romantic relationships.
Various theories have suggested possible mechanisms that may positively or negatively affect relationship outcomes. For example, according to the equilibrium model, committed, romantic relationships face threats over time [48]. These threats may stem from increased involvement in couple commitments, household, and childcare, which may be less enjoyable than shared leisure activities [49]. These increasing commitments may result in ineffective support or conflict [48], decrease partners' relationship satisfaction, sense of commitment, and even lead to separation. In order to maintain relationship satisfaction and duration, couples have to cope with these threats that endanger their relationship [48, 50].
According to the motivation-management model of romantic relationships, there are three means for mitigating threats: justifying costs, ensuring mutual dependence, and accommodating rather than retaliating in response to hurting behavior from the partner [50, 51]. The latter may be reflected in one's acute feelings of hurt and rejection and the tendency to inhibit punitive inclinations in reaction to his/her partner's negative communication [48]. Relationship satisfaction and commitment often increase when a hurt spouse inhibits his punitive inclinations [52], while on the contrary, mentioning a spouse's past transgressions as punitive inclinations may provoke hostile thoughts and behavior [53]. Cannabis use may have positive and negative effects on the ability to face relationship threats. For example, on the one hand, it may increase love and intimate experience in a way that promotes positive communication and conflict resolution [15•]; on the other hand, it may result in increased avoidance which may negatively affect the ability to resolve conflicts [19••]. Therefore, future research should explore the effect of cannabis use on couple's use of constructive and destructive exchanges, and the extent to which such use predicts more accurate outcomes in romantic relationships [54].
-
ii.
What is the effect of cannabis use on specific emotional and communicative patterns in couple interactions?
Methodological advances in recent years have allowed for further exploration of the effect of cannabis use within the context of romantic relationships. Empirically assessing the nature of romantic couples' interaction via a systematic analysis of communication patterns in a recorded and structured interaction, is a predictive measure for various relationship outcomes. According to Gottman and Notarius [54], observable couple interactions may predict relationships and life transitions, including divorce, marriage, and parenting. Evidence suggests that several patterns observed in couple interactions may predict separation or divorce, including a high ratio of negativity-to-positivity in conversation [55] and the "four horsemen of the apocalypse" [56, p.110]: criticism, defensiveness, stonewalling, and contempt [54, 56, 57].
Evidence suggests that the association between substance use and relationship satisfaction may be mediated by various aspects of dyadic interactions. On the one hand, concordant substance use may serve as a protective factor, by being a leisure activity engaged in by both partners. For example, couples who use alcohol together tend to exhibit less conflict in their interactions, leading to greater intimacy and more positive regard in their relationship, compared to couples in which only one partner uses these substances [15•, 34, 58]. Similarly, discrepant alcohol use may lead to poor relationship quality and lower satisfaction via the mediating effect of aggressive or defiant responses exhibited by the (heavier) user, or alternatively, criticism and/or regulation strategies by the non-/lighter-using partner in an attempt to restrain use [34, 59]. However, the role of these factors in the context of cannabis use is as yet unclear.
-
iii.
Does decreased motivation due to cannabis use moderate its effect on romantic relationships?
Heavy cannabis use has been repeatedly associated with an amotivational state, in which cannabis use may foster apathy through the depletion of motivation-based constructs such as self-efficacy, initiative and persistence [60]. Amotivational syndrome is defined as an impaired ability to engage in perceived normal daily activities, including social interactions, due to cannabis use [61, 62]. Amotivation in heavy cannabis users may be attributed in part to the fact that cannabis itself may become a major motivator, so that other activities (e.g., social participation) become demoted in the individual’s reward hierarchy [63]. Maintaining romantic relationships requires a certain amount of will, effort, and resources, and motivation plays an important role in various aspects of romantic relationships, such as perceived partner responsiveness, intimacy/sex life and level of commitment [64,65,66].
-
iv. What is the role of impaired cognition following cannabis use?
A growing body of evidence supports the notion that heavy cannabis use is associated with impairment in various aspects of cognition, including short-term memory, attention and learning [4, 63, 67, 68]. There is some indication that these impairments are associated with poorer academic functioning (i.e., participating in higher education, drop-out rates and academic performance [22, 69]) and poorer occupational functioning (i.e., unemployment, lower income [70, 71]). Cognitive impairments as well as their functional sequelae (academic, occupational) may be deleterious to romantic relationships.
-
3.
Lack of a comprehensive construct for assessing intensity of cannabis use
Addressing level of discrepancy/concordance of cannabis use may be insufficient to predict relationship quality, as it does not sufficiently account for the specific effects of intensive cannabis use on behavior, cognition, and affect which may jeopardize romantic relationships [15•, 33•].
Studies which have investigated the effect of cannabis use on romantic relationships used frequency of cannabis use (i.e., number of days an individual uses cannabis within a certain period of time [72]) as a sole determinant of cannabis use intensity. Quantity measures of cannabis use, commonly defined as the number of "joints" (rolled cannabis cigarettes) smoked, are also common [73]. Notably, assessing intensity levels of cannabis use by a single component has shown insufficient predictive validity [74], accounting for only a small portion of the variance in cannabis-related negative consequences [75] and has been widely criticized [72, 76]. In a recent large-scale study, an integrated Frequency-by-Quantity interaction measure has been shown to be somewhat superior in predicting CUD and cannabis-related problems among cannabis users, compared to frequency ('days using cannabis per-year') or quantity ('joints per day') measures, independently [72].
Cannabis research has long acknowledged that a valid measure of cannabis use intensity should also include some form of potency indices [72, 76]. This has to do with the fact that different cannabis strains vary in concentration level of cannabinoids (i.e., the psychoactive ingredients in cannabis), and therefore has an indeterminate effect on behavior, cognition, and emotion [63]. Specifically, pre-clinical and clinical studies emphasized the negative effect of administrating high Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration on cognition and behavior [7, 77]. Naturally, exploring cannabis' potency in observational research is more complex, as the majority of studies are technically inadequate to assess its potency in naturalistic environments. Recent epidemiological research which used self-report measures of cannabis potency has pointed to the association between daily use of high-potency cannabis (i.e., high THC concentration) and increased risk for psychopathology onset, including psychosis, CUD, tobacco dependence, and anxiety disorder [7, 78, 79]. Technological advances in toxicology now allow for fast and accurate analysis of THC levels in plant-based cannabis products. Using a mobile laboratory, researchers can now assess cannabis potency on-site and explore its direct effect on behavior [80]. In conclusion, the use of an integrative measure of cannabis use intensity, combining frequency, quantity and potency of cannabis use, may contribute to our understanding of the effect of cannabis use on romantic relationships.
-
4.
Assessing the effect of cannabis use in non-emerging adults
Studies on the effect of cannabis use on relationship quality has focused on emerging adults (approximately ages 18–30) [15•, 33•]. Indeed, young adults are highly prone to use cannabis and are at the highest risk to suffer from its negative effects, presumably due to the cannabis' effect on the developing brain at these stages of life [81], yet rates of cannabis use in middle and late adulthood are reported to be on the rise [82]. Based on alcohol-related studies, it is likely that cannabis use may have different effects on romantic relationship in various phases of life. For example, for young adults, who are usually at the beginning of their relationship, it may serve as an enjoyable leisure activity for both partners [83].
Contrarily, romantic couples in middle and late adulthood are more likely to be in a longstanding relationship facing increased demands related to household and childcare which may be drudgery and not enjoyed compared to shared leisure activities [49]. It may well be that during middle and late adulthood, cannabis use shifts from a shared leisure activity, which increases romantic bond and intimacy [15•], to a time and energy consuming activity which may impair partners' ability to cope with the challenges and demands of mutual responsibilities. However, to date, there is insufficient data on age differences in the effect of cannabis use on relationship satisfaction and functioning.
-
5.
Gender differences
Gender differences are often reported with regard to patterns of cannabis use, prevalence of CUD symptoms and utilization of CUD treatment [10]. However, little is known concerning gender-differences on the effect of cannabis use on romantic relationships. In one study, women who reported more frequent cannabis use and greater cannabis use discrepancies relative to other couples reported poorer satisfaction [33•]. This is in line with prior research which indicated that women’s substance (non-cannabis) use, particularly when it exceeds male use, results in particularly negative consequences for relationship outcomes [25, 34].
Conclusions
The global prevalence of cannabis use is constantly on the rise, in part due to changes in its legal status [1]. Heavy cannabis users are highly prone to suffer from various physical, psychiatric, and behavioral adverse effects [4,5,6,7,8], and extensive research is being conducted to identify predictors and outcomes of heavy cannabis use. Committed romantic relationships play an important role in psychological well-being [84], yet data on the association between cannabis use and romantic relationships is scarce and inconsistent [24]. While heavy cannabis use and CUD were historically associated with significantly lower odds for obtaining and maintaining a steady intimate relationship, these findings were based on gross measures (e.g., marriage, divorce) and lacked methodological grounds for inferring causality [30]. In recent years, research has indicated that relationship quality is poorer at times when the discrepancy in cannabis use frequency is greater than typical for the couple [15•, 31, 33•]. However, little is known concerning possible underlying mechanisms through which cannabis use may affect relationship quality [30].
Methodologically, longitudinal studies are needed to explore the bidirectional association between cannabis use and romantic relationship quality. In addition, relying on frequency or quantity of cannabis use has shown insufficient validity and specificity in predicting cannabis-related negative consequences [74, 75]. Therefore, we recommend using an integrative exposure measure, constituting frequency-by-quantity-by-potency interaction, which may allow for a more valid and comprehensive exploration of cannabis use intensity and its correlates among heavy users [85]. Furthermore, it is important to assess the association between cannabis use and romantic relationship quality using both dyadic analyses and between-group (cannabis-use discrepancy) comparisons. Finally, future research should explore the contribution of motivation, cognition, gender, and various age groups to the quality of romantic relationship. With increased prevalence of cannabis use, globally, and emerging changes in its legal status, effort should be made to identify specific beneficial and hazardous effects associated with cannabis use, including its effect on various aspects of romantic relationships.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World drug report: drugs market trends Cannabis, opioids. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; 2022. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/world-drug-report-2022.html.
Simpson KA, Cho J, Barrington-Trimis JL. The association of type of cannabis product used and frequency of use with problematic cannabis use in a sample of young adult cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;226:108865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108865.
Chan GC, Hall W. Estimation of the proportion of population cannabis consumption in Australia that is accounted for by daily users using Monte Carlo Simulation. Addiction. 2020;115(6):1182–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14909.
Broyd SJ, van Hell HH, Beale C, Yuecel M, Solowij N. Acute and chronic effects of cannabinoids on human cognition: a systematic review. Biol Psychiat. 2016;79(7):557–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.12.002.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The health effects of cannabis and cannabinoids: the current state of evidence and recommendations for research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2017. https://doi.org/10.17226/24625.
Rogeberg O, Elvik R. The effects of cannabis intoxication on motor vehicle collision revisited and revised. Addiction. 2016;111(8):1348–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13347.
Di Forti M, Quattrone D, Freeman TP, Tripoli G, Gayer-Anderson C, Quigley H, et al. The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(5):427–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30048-3.
Feingold D, Livne O, Rehm J, Lev-Ran S. Probability and correlates of transition from cannabis use to DSM-5 cannabis use disorder: results from a large-scale nationally representative study. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020;39(2):142–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13031.
Derrick JL, Wittkower LD, Pierce JD. Committed relationships and substance use: recent findings and future directions. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019;30:74–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.002.
Courtney KE, Mejia MH, Jacobus J. Longitudinal studies on the etiology of cannabis use disorder: a review. Curr Addict Rep. 2017;4:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-017-0133-3.
Kansky J. What’s love got to do with it? Romantic relationships and well-being. In: Diener E, Oishi S, Tay L, editors. Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers; 2018. p. 619–42.
Davila J, Mattanah J, Bhatia V, Latack JA, Feinstein BA, Eaton NR, et al. Romantic competence, healthy relationship functioning, and well-being in emerging adults. Pers Relat. 2017;24(1):162–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12175.
Adamczyk K, Segrin C. Perceived social support and mental health among single vs. partnered Polish young adults. Curr Psychol. 2015;34(1):82–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9242-5.
Gómez-López M, Viejo C, Ortega-Ruiz R. Well-being and romantic relationships: a systematic review in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(13):1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132415.
• Testa M, Wang W, Derrick JL, Leonard KE. Marijuana use episodes and partner intimacy experiences: a daily report study. Cannabis. 2019;2(1):19–28. https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis.2019.01.002. This study presents important evidence regarding the association between partners’ simultaneous cannabis use and subsequent experience of intimacy.
Sternberg RJ. Cupid's arrow: the course of love through time. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): professional manual. Odessa: Psychol Assess Resour. 1992.
Bresin K, Mekawi Y. Do marijuana use motives matter? Meta-analytic associations with marijuana use frequency and problems. Addict Behav. 2019;99:106102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106102.
•• Haydon KC, Salvatore JE. Relationship perceptions and conflict behavior among cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022;237:109502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109502. This study compared cannabis using couples’ self-reported reflection on their behavior during conflict to the assessment of trained raters of conflict behavior, while also assessing couple’s parasympathetic activity during conflict.
Brook JS, Lee JY, Brown EN, Finch SJ, Brook DW. Developmental trajectories of marijuana use from adolescence to adulthood: personality and social role outcomes. Psychol Rep. 2011;108(2):339–57. https://doi.org/10.2466/10.18.PR0.108.2.339-357.
Green KM, Doherty EE, Ensminger ME. Long-term consequences of adolescent cannabis use: examining intermediary processes. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017;43(5):567–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2016.1258706.
Boden JM, Dhakal B, Foulds JA, Horwood LJ. Life-course trajectories of cannabis use: a latent class analysis of a New Zealand birth cohort. Addiction. 2020;115(2):279–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14814.
Feingold D, Rehm J, Factor H, Redler A, Lev-Ran S. Clinical and functional outcomes of cannabis use among individuals with anxiety disorders: a 3-year population-based longitudinal study. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35(6):490–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22735.
Castellanos-Ryan N, Morin É, Rioux C, London-Nadeau K, Leblond M. Academic, socioeconomic and interpersonal consequences of cannabis use: a narrative review. Drugs: Educ Prev Policy. 2022;29(3):199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2021.1906846.
Leonard KE, Smith PH, Homish GG. Concordant and discordant alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use as predictors of marital dissolution. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28(3):780–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034053.
Marshal MP. For better or for worse? The effects of alcohol use on marital functioning. Clin Psychol Rev. 2003;23(7):959–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2003.09.002.
White HR, Bechtold J, Loeber R, Pardini D. Divergent marijuana trajectories among men: socioeconomic, relationship, and life satisfaction outcomes in the mid-30s. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;156:62–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.031.
Kaestner R. The effects of cocaine and marijuana use on marriage and marital stability. J Fam Issues. 1997;18(2):145–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/01925139701800200.
Yamaguchi K, Kandel DB. On the resolution of role incompatibility: a life event history analysis of family roles and marijuana use. Am J Sociol. 1985;90(6):1284–325.
Derrick JL, Leonard KE. Substance use in committed relationships. In: Sher KJ, editor. The Oxford handbook of substance use and substance use disorders. Oxford University Press; 2016. p. 549–78.
Crane CA, Testa M, Schlauch RC, Leonard KE. The couple that smokes together: dyadic marijuana use and relationship functioning during conflict. Psychol Addict Behav. 2016;30(6):686–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000198.
Homish GG, Leonard KE, Cornelius JR. Illicit drug use and marital satisfaction. Addict Behav. 2008;33(2):279–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.09.015.
• Testa M, Wang W, Derrick JL, Leonard KE. Marijuana use by intimate partners: does discrepant use impair relationship functioning? Psychol Addict Behav. 2018;32(4):475–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000357. This study presents important evidence regarding the association between partners’ cannabis use discrepancy and poorer couple functioning.
Levitt A, Cooper ML. Daily alcohol use and romantic relationship functioning: evidence of bidirectional, gender, and context-specific effects. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010;36(12):1706–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210388420.
Torvik FA, Røysamb E, Gustavson K, Idstad M, Tambs K. Discordant and concordant alcohol use in spouses as predictors of marital dissolution in the general population: results from the hunt study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2013;37(5):877–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.12029.
DiBello AM, Preddy TM, Øverup CS, Neighbors C. Understanding the context of romantic partner relational victimization: links between relationship satisfaction, depressive symptoms, and alcohol-related problems. Psychol Violence. 2017;7(4):543–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000064.
Fairbairn CE, Cranford JA. A multimethod examination of negative behaviors during couples interactions and problem drinking trajectories. J Abnorm Psychol. 2016;125(6):805–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000186.
Derrick JL, Testa M. Temporal effects of perpetrating or receiving intimate partner aggression on alcohol consumption: a daily diary study of community couples. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017;78(2):213–21. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2017.78.213.
Blumenstock SM, Papp LM. Substance use behaviors in the daily lives of US college students reporting recent use: the varying roles of romantic relationships. Soc Sci Med. 2021;279:114021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114021.
Angulski K, Armstrong T, Bouffard LA. The influence of romantic relationships on substance use in emerging adulthood. J Drug Issues. 2018;48(4):572–89.
Buckner JD, Zvolensky MJ. Cannabis and related impairment: the unique roles of cannabis use to cope with social anxiety and social avoidance. Am J Addict. 2014;23(6):598–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-0391.2014.12150.x.
Buckner JD, Schmidt NB, Lang AR, Small JW, Schlauch RC, Lewinsohn PM. Specificity of social anxiety disorder as a risk factor for alcohol and cannabis dependence. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42(3):230–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.01.002.
Khantzian EJ, Albanese MJ. Understanding addiction as self medication: finding hope behind the pain. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2008.
van der Pol P, Liebregts N, de Graaf R, Ten Have M, Korf DJ, van den Brink W, et al. Mental health differences between frequent cannabis users with and without dependence and the general population. Addiction. 2013;108(8):1459–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12196.
Foster KT, Arterberry BJ, Iacono WG, McGue M, Hicks BM. Psychosocial functioning among regular cannabis users with and without cannabis use disorder. Psychol Med. 2018;48(11):1853–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717003361.
Zehra A, Burns J, Liu CK, Manza P, Wiers CE, Volkow ND, et al. Cannabis addiction and the brain: a review. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2018;13:438–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-018-9782-9.
Koob GF, Le Moal M. Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24(2):97–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00195-0.
Murray SL, Holmes JG, Griffin DW, Derrick JL. The equilibrium model of relationship maintenance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015;108(1):93–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000004.
Huston TL, McHale SM, Crouter AC. When the honeymoon’s over: changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In: Gilmour R, Duck S, editors. The emerging field of personal relationships. Routledge; 1986. p. 109–32.
Murray SL, Holmes JG. Interdependent minds: the dynamics of close relationships. New York: Guilford Press; 2011.
Murray SL, Holmes JG. The architecture of interdependent minds: a motivation-management theory of mutual responsiveness. Psychol Rev. 2009;116(4):908–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017015.
Rusbult CE, Verette J, Whitney GA, Slovik LF, Lipkus I. Accommodation processes in close relationships: theory and preliminary empirical evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;60(1):53–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53.
Murray SL, Derrick JL, Leder S, Holmes JG. Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: a levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;94(3):429–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429.
Gottman JM, Notarius CI. Decade review: observing marital interaction. J Marriage Fam. 2000;62(4):927–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00927.x.
Lavner JA, Bradbury TN. Why do even satisfied newlyweds eventually go on to divorce? J Fam Psychol. 2012;26(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025966.
Gottman JM. The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: a longitudinal view of five types of couples. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(1):6–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.6.
Gottman JM, Levenson RW. Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: behavior, physiology, and health. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;63(2):221–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.221.
Homish GG, Leonard KE. Marital quality and congruent drinking. J Stud Alcohol. 2005;66(4):488–96. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2005.66.488.
Rodriguez LM, Neighbors C, Osilla KC, Trail TE. The longitudinal effects of military spouses’ concern and behaviors over partner drinking on relationship functioning. Alcohol. 2019;76:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.07.004.
Pacheco-Colón I, Limia JM, Gonzalez R. Nonacute effects of cannabis use on motivation and reward sensitivity in humans: a systematic review. Psychol Addict Behav. 2018;32(5):497–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000380.
Borcherding MJ. Marijuana use among community college students: a study of academic and social involvement [dissertation on the Internet]. St. Cloud: St. Cloud State University; 2016. Available from: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/hied_etds/7.
Goode E. Drug use and grades in college. Nature. 1971;234(5326):225–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/234225a0.
Volkow ND, Swanson JM, Evins AE, DeLisi LE, Meier MH, Gonzalez R, et al. Effects of cannabis use on human behavior, including cognition, motivation, and psychosis: a review. JAMA Psychiat. 2016;73(3):292–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.3278.
Lemay EP, Clark MS. Motivated cognition in relationships. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015;1:72–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.002.
Joel S, Gordon AM, Impett EA, MacDonald G, Keltner D. The things you do for me: perceptions of a romantic partner’s investments promote gratitude and commitment. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013;39(10):1333–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213497801.
Muise A. When and for whom is sex most beneficial? Sexual motivation in romantic relationships. Can Psychol. 2017;58(1):69–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000094.
G Bossong M, Jager G, Bhattacharyya S, Allen P. Acute and non-acute effects of cannabis on human memory function: a critical review of neuroimaging studies. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2014;20(13):2114-25.
Figueiredo PR, Tolomeo S, Steele JD, Baldacchino A. Neurocognitive consequences of chronic cannabis use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;108:358–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.10.014.
Macleod J, Oakes R, Copello A, Crome I, Egger M, Hickman M, et al. Psychological and social sequelae of cannabis and other illicit drug use by young people: a systematic review of longitudinal, general population studies. The Lancet. 2004;363(9421):1579–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16200-4.
Lee JY, Brook JS, Finch SJ, Brook DW. Trajectories of marijuana use from adolescence to adulthood predicting unemployment in the mid 30s. Am J Addict. 2015;24(5):452–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.12240.
Zhang C, Brook JS, Leukefeld CG, Brook DW. Trajectories of marijuana use from adolescence to adulthood as predictors of unemployment status in the early forties. Am J Addict. 2016;25(3):203–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.12361.
Temple EC, Brown RF, Hine DW. The ‘grass ceiling’: limitations in the literature hinder our understanding of cannabis use and its consequences. Addiction. 2011;106(2):238–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03139.x.
Van Der Pol P, Liebregts N, De Graaf R, Korf DJ, van den Brink W, van Laar M. Predicting the transition from frequent cannabis use to cannabis dependence: a three-year prospective study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;133(2):352–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.06.009.
Buu A, Hu Y-H, Pampati S, Arterberry BJ, Lin H-C. Predictive validity of cannabis consumption measures: results from a national longitudinal study. Addict Behav. 2017;73:36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.04.014.
Pearson MR. A meta-analytic investigation of the associations between cannabis use and cannabis-related negative consequences. Psychol Addict Behav. 2019;33(3):190–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000452.
López-Pelayo H, Matrai S, Balcells-Olivero M, Campeny E, Braddick F, Bossong MG, et al. Supporting future cannabis policy–developing a standard joint unit: a brief back-casting exercise. Front Psych. 2021;12:675033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.675033.
Colizzi M, Bhattacharyya S. Does cannabis composition matter? Differential effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human cognition. Curr Addict Rep. 2017;4:62–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-017-0142-2.
Hines LA, Freeman TP, Gage SH, Zammit S, Hickman M, Cannon M, et al. Association of high-potency cannabis use with mental health and substance use in adolescence. JAMA Psychiat. 2020;77(10):1044–51. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1035.
Arterberry BJ, Padovano HT, Foster KT, Zucker RA, Hicks BM. Higher average potency across the United States is associated with progression to first cannabis use disorder symptom. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;195:186–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.11.012.
Hitchcock LN, Tracy BL, Bryan AD, Hutchison KE, Bidwell LC. Acute effects of cannabis concentrate on motor control and speed: smartphone-based mobile assessment. Front Psych. 2021;11:623672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.623672.
Albaugh MD, Ottino-Gonzalez J, Sidwell A, Lepage C, Juliano A, Owens MM, et al. Association of cannabis use during adolescence with neurodevelopment. JAMA Psychiat. 2021;78(9):1031–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1258.
Mauro PM, Carliner H, Brown QL, Hasin DS, Shmulewitz D, Rahim-Juwel R, et al. Age differences in daily and nondaily cannabis use in the United States, 2002–2014. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018;79(3):423–31. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2018.79.423.
Linden-Carmichael AN, Lau-Barraco C, Kelley ML. College student dating partner drinking profiles: differences in relationship functioning and relationship-specific alcohol expectancies. Subst Use Misuse. 2016;51(7):840–52.
Lavner JA, Bradbury TN. Marriage and committed partnerships. In: Fiese BH, Celano M, Deater-Deckard K, Jouriles EN, Whisman MA, editors. APA handbook of contemporary family psychology: Foundations, methods, and contemporary issues across the lifespan. American Psychological Association; 2019. p. 445–61.
Callaghan RC, Sanches M, Kish SJ. Quantity and frequency of cannabis use in relation to cannabis-use disorder and cannabis-related problems. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;217:108271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108271.
Acknowledgements
Aviya Ashwal-Malka would like to thank Ariel University for the financial support during the course of her research.
Funding
This work was supported by the Israeli Science Foundation [grant #1420/23].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Aviya Ashwal-Malka: writing—original draft, literature search, and writing—review and editing. Yoram Braw: conceptualization, reviewed the manuscript, and supervision. Daniel Feingold: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, and supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ashwal-Malka, A., Braw, Y. & Feingold, D. Cannabis Use and Emotions in Romantic Relationships. Curr Addict Rep 11, 654–662 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-024-00566-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-024-00566-y