Correction to: Annals of Forest Science (2019) 76:73
The article was published with errors in figures 10 and 11. The author group wishes readers to know of a mislabeling error and the labels for this material should be reversed.
Readers are asked to consider the following:
Fig.10 becomes (the graph is unchanged)
Stand density management diagram (SDMD) for oak in the Lyons-la-Forêt experiment. Three parallel size-density lines are represented: the maximum size-density line (RDI = 1), the line of mortality onset (RDI = 0.35), and the line of 10% cumulative mortality rate (RDI = 0.62). Also represented on the figure is the zone where cumulative mortality is under 10% (shaded area).
Figure 11 becomes (the graph is unchanged)
New fitted size-density trajectories (in logarithmic scales) of the beech plots of the Lyons-la-Forêt experiment with inflection points aligned parallel to the maximum size-density line (observed size density data coming from the two blocks of the Lyons-la-Forêt beech design are also shown, see Ningre et al. 2016a).
Moreover, in the following sentence at the end of Appendix 2, the figure number is changed.
For this value, the RDI is equal to 0.62 (Fig. 10).
The original article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: John M. Lhotka
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0855-6
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ningre, F., Ottorini, JM. & Le Goff, N. Correction to: Size-density trajectories for even-aged sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands revealing similarities and differences in the mortality process. Annals of Forest Science 77, 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-0917-9
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-0917-9