Abstract
An automatic modeling scheme is developed in the space domain to interpret the gravity anomalies of sedimentary basins, among which the density contrast decreases exponentially with depth. Forward modeling is realized in the space domain using a combination of both analytical and numerical approaches. A collage of vertical prisms having equal widths, whose depths are to be estimated, describes the geometry of a sedimentary basin. Initial depths of a sedimentary basin are predicted using the Bouguer slab formula and subsequently updated, iteratively, based on the differences between the observed and theoretical gravity anomalies until the modeled gravity anomalies mimic the observed ones. The validity and applicability of the method is demonstrated with a synthetic and two real field gravity anomalies, one each over the Chintalpudi sub-basin in India and the other over the San Jacinto graben, California. In case of synthetic example, the assumed structure resembles a typical intracratonic rift basin formed by normal block faulting and filled with thick section of sediments. The proposed modeling technique yielded information that is consistent with the assumed parameters in the case of synthetic structure and with the available/drilling depths in case of field examples.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agarwal, B.P. (1995) Hydrocarbon prospects of the Pranhita-Godavari graben, India. Proc. Petrotech, v.95, pp.115–121.
Barbosa, V.C.F., Silva, J.B.C. and Medeiros, W.E. (1997) Gravity inversion of basement relief using approximate equality constraints on depths. Geophysics, v.62(6), pp.1745–1757.
Barbosa, V.C.F., Silva, J.B.C. and Medeiros, W.E. (1999) Gravity inversion of a discontinuous relief stabilized by weighted smoothness constraints on depth. Geophysics, v.64(5), pp.1429–1437.
Blakely, R.J. (1995) Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 464p.
Bott, M.H.P. (1960) The use of rapid digital computing methods for direct gravity interpretation of sedimentary basins. Geophys. Jour. Royal Astron. Soc, v.3(1), pp.63–67.
Chai, Y. and Hinze, W.J. (1988) Gravity inversion of an interface above, which the density contrast varies exponentially with depth. Geophysics, v.53(6), pp.837–845.
Chakravarthi, V. (2003) Digitally implemented method for automatic optimization of gravity fields obtained from three-dimensional density interfaces using depth dependent density. US Patent 6,615,139.
Chakravarthi, V. (2009a) Gravity anomalies of pull-apart basins having finite strike length with depth dependent density: A ridge regression inversion. Near Surface Geophysics, v.7, pp.217–226.
Chakravarthi, V. (2009b) Automatic gravity inversion for simultaneous estimation of model parameters and regional gravity background: an application to 2D pull-apart basins. Curr. Sci., v.96(10), pp.1349–1360.
Chakravarthi, V. (2011) Automatic gravity optimization of 2.5D strike listric fault sources with analytically defined fault planes and depth dependent density. Geophysics, v.76(2), pp.121–131.
Chakravarthi, V. and Sundararajan, N. (2004) Ridge regression algorithm for gravity inversion of fault structures with variable density. Geophysics, v. 69, pp.1394–1404.
Chakravarthi, V. and Sundararajan, N. (2006a) Gravity anomalies of 2.5-D multiple prismatic structures with variable density: A Marquardt inversion. Pure and Applied Geophysics, v.163, pp.229–242.
Chakravarthi, V. and Sundararajan, N. (2006b) Discussion on “The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism with density varying with depth following a cubic polynomial” by Juan Garcia-Abdeslem (November–December 2005, Geophysics, pp.j39–j42), Geophysics, v.71, pp.X17–X19.
Cordell, L. (1973) Gravity analysis using an exponential densitydepth function-San Jacinto Graben, California. Geophysics, v.38(4), pp.684–690.
Fett, J.D. (1968) Geophysical investigation of the San Jacinto Valley, Riverside County, California: Unpublished thesis, University of California at Riverside, 87p.
Garcia-abdeslem, J. (1996) GL2D: A Fortran program to compute the gravity anomaly of a 2-d prism where density varies as a function of depth. Computers & Geosciences, v.22(7), pp.823–826.
Garcia-abdeslem, J. (2005) The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism with density varying with depth following a cubic polynomial. Geophysics, v.70, pp.j39–j42.
Hermes, H.J. (1986) Calculation of pre-Zechstein Bouguer anomaly in northwest Germany. First Break, v.4, pp.13–22.
Holstein, H. (2003) Gravimagnetic anomaly formulas for polyhedra of spatially linear media. Geophysics, v.68, pp.157–167.
Leão, J.W.D., Menezes, P.T.L., Beltrão, J.F. and Silva, J.B.C. (1996) Gravity inversion of basement relief constrained by the knowledge of depth at isolated points. Geophysics, v.61(6), pp.1702–1714.
Litinsky, V.A. (1989) Concept of effective density: key to gravity depth determinations for sedimentary basins. Geophysics, v.54(11), pp.1474–1482.
Maxant, J. (1980) Variation of density with rock type, depth, and formation in the Western Canada basin from density logs. Geophysics, v.45(6), pp.1061–1076.
Moral, C.R., Gümez Ortiz, D. and Tejero, R. (2000) Spectral analysis and gravity modelling of the Almazán basin (Central Spain). Jour. Geol. Soc. Spain, v.13, pp.131–142.
Murthy, I.V.R. (1998) Gravity and magnetic interpretation in exploration geophysics. Geological Society of India, Bangalore, 363p.
Murthy, I.V.R. and Rao, D.B. (1979) Gravity anomalies of twodimensional bodies of irregular cross-section with density contrast varying with depth. Geophysics, v.44(9), pp.1525–1530.
Murthy, I.V.R. and Rao, S.J. (1989) A Fortran 77 program for inverting gravity anomalies of two-dimensional basement structures. Computers & geosciences, v.15(7), pp.1149–1156.
Nagihara, S. and Hall, S.A. (2001) Three-dimensional gravity inversion using simulated annealing: constraints on the diapiric roots of allochthonous salt structures. Geophysics, v.66, pp.1438–1449.
Rao, C.S.R. (1982) Coal resources of Tamilnadu, Andhra Pradesh, Orissa and Maharashtra. Bull. Geol Surv. India, v.2, pp.1–103.
Rao, D.B. (1986) Modeling of sedimentary basins from gravity anomalies with variable density contrast. Geophys. Jour. Royal Astron. Soc, v.84(1), pp.207–212.
Rao, D.B. (1990) Analysis of gravity anomalies of sedimentary basins by an asymmetrical trapezoidal model with quadratic density function. Geophysics, v.55, pp.226–231.
Rao, D.B. and Rao, C.P.V.N.J.M. (1999) Two-dimensional interpretation of gravity anomalies over sedimentary basins with an exponential decrease in density contrast with depth. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.), v.108(2), pp.99–106.
Ruotoistenmäki, T. (1992) The gravity anomaly of two-dimensional source with continuous density distribution bounded by continuous surfaces. Geophysics, v.57(4), pp.623–628.
Singh, B. and Guptasarma, D. (2001) New method for fast computation of gravity and magnetic anomalies from arbitrary polyhedral. Geophysics, v.66, pp.521–526.
Talwani, M., Worzel, J. and Ladisman, M. (1959) Rapid gravity computations for two dimensional bodies with application to the Mendocino submarine fracture zone. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.64(1), pp.49–59.
Won, I.J. and Bevis, M. (1987) Computing the gravitational and magnetic anomalies due to a polygon: Algorithms and Fortran subroutines., Geophysics, v.52, pp.232–238.
Zhou, X. (2008) Two-dimensional (2D) vector gravity potential and gen-eral line integrals for gravity anomaly due to 2D masses of depth-dependent density contrast. Geophysics, v.73, pp.143–150.
Zhou, X. (2009) General line integrals for gravity anomalies of irregular two-dimensional (2D) masses with horizontallyand vertically-dependent density contrast. Geophysics, v.74, pp.11–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chakravarthi, V., Ramamma, B. & Venkat Reddy, T. Gravity anomaly modeling of sedimentary basins by means of multiple structures and exponential density contrast-depth variations: A space domain approach. J Geol Soc India 82, 561–569 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-013-0188-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-013-0188-2