Abstract
Robots are often portrayed in the media as human-like, yet research suggests that people prefer to interact with robots that are not human-like. This study aimed to investigate whether people’s mental schemas about robots’ humanness were associated with their reactions to a robot. It was hypothesised that people who thought of robots as more human-like would be more anxious when subsequently interacting with a robot. Fifty-seven participants aged over 40 years were asked to draw their idea of a healthcare robot using standardised instructions before seeing the real robot. They reported their emotions at baseline and a medical student measured their blood pressure. The drawings were categorised as human-like or box-like by the researchers and drawing size was measured. Participants were then introduced to a robot that measured their blood pressure, and they reported their emotions during the interaction. Participants who had drawn a human-like robot had significantly greater increases in blood pressure readings and negative emotions from baseline in reaction to the robot compared to those who had drawn a box-like robot. Larger drawings of healthcare robots predicted higher ratings of negative emotions during the robot interaction. This study suggests that people who have mental schemas that robots are human-like experience heightened wariness in interactions with robots. Larger drawings of robots may indicate greater anxiety towards them. Assessing mental schemas of robot human-likeness is an important consideration for the acceptance of social robots. Standardised drawing instructions and scoring are a useful method to assess cognitions and emotions towards robots.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Khan Z (1998) Attitudes towards intelligent service robots. Report number: TRITA-NA-P9821, IPLab-154. Interaction and Presentation Laboratory (IPLab), Numerical Analysis and Computing Science (Nada), Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden
Bumby KE, Dautenhahn K (1999) Investigating children’s attitudes towards robots: a case study. In: Proceedings third cognitive technology conference CT’99, USA
Arras KO, Cerqui D (2005) Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000 people survey. Technical Report Nr. 0605-001, Autonomous Systems Lab, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
Oestreicher L (2007) Cognitive, social, sociable or just socially acceptable robots? In: Proceedings 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication RO-MAN, Korea, pp 558–563
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Billard A (2004) Robots as assistive technology—does appearance matter. In: Proceedings 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication RO-MAN, Japan, pp 277–282
Cesta A, Cortellessa G, Giuliani MV, Pecora F, Scopelliti M, Tiberio L (2007) Psychological implications of domestic assistive technology for the elderly. Psycho Oncol 5:229–252
Mori M (1970) Bukimi no tani (the uncanny valley). Energy 7:33–35
Woods S, Dautenhahn K, Schulz J (2004) The design space of robots: investigating children’s views. In: Proceedings 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication RO-MAN, Japan, pp 47–52
Kaplan F (2004) Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. Int J Humanoid Robot 1(3):465–480
Machover K (1949) Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. CC Thomas, Oxford
Craddick R (1961) Size of Santa Claus drawings as a function of time before and after Christmas. J Psychol Stud 12:121–125
Broadbent E, Ellis CJ, Gamble G, Petrie KJ (2006) Changes in patient drawings of the heart identify slow recovery following myocardial infarction. Psychosom Med 68:910–913
Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Ellis CJ, Ying J, Gamble G (2004) A picture of health—myocardial infarction patients’ drawing of their hearts and subsequent disability: A longitudinal study. J Psychosom Res 57:583–587
Broadbent E, Kuo I, Lee YI, Rabindran J, Kerse N, Stafford R, MacDonald B (2010) Attitudes and reactions to a healthcare robot. Telemed J E Health 16:608–613
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The positive and negative affect scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070
Stein DJ (1992) Schemas in the cognitive and clinical sciences: An integrative construct. J Psychother Integrat 2:45–63
Breazeal C (2004) Social interactions in HRI: The robot view. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part C, Appl Rev 34:181–186
Bartneck C, Kuli D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2010) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1:71–81
Broadbent E, Stafford R, MacDonald B (2009) Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. Int J Soc Robot 1:319–330
Goetz JL, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication RO-MAN, USA
Li D, Rau PLP, Li Y (2010) A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. Int J Soc Robot 2:175–186
Bethel CL, Murphy RR (2009) Use of large sample sizes and multiple evaluation methods in human-robot interaction experimentation. In: AAAI spring symposium on experimental design for real-world systems
Picard RW (2010) Emotion research by the people, for the people. Emot Rev 2:250–254
Young JE, Hawkins R, Sharlin E, Igarashi T (2009) Toward acceptable domestic robots: Applying insights from social psychology. Int J Soc Robot 1:95–108
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Broadbent, E., Lee, Y.I., Stafford, R.Q. et al. Mental Schemas of Robots as More Human-Like Are Associated with Higher Blood Pressure and Negative Emotions in a Human-Robot Interaction. Int J of Soc Robotics 3, 291–297 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-011-0096-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-011-0096-9