Abstract
Understanding solution multiplicity of smoke flow at the same building configuration and ambient conditions is important for managing smoke flows and human evacuation in buildings. One of the known examples with solution multiplicity is in a simple single-compartment building on fire under an opposing wind. The occurrence of multiple solutions of smoke flow is induced by competing wind and thermal buoyancy forces. Under a given and moderate wind, the critical buoyancy flux ratio for the existence of smoke flow multiplicity, which is a ratio between defined parameters representing buoyancy force and wind pressure, is related to building height and opening area, as shown using a zone model. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were used here to evaluate whether the behaviour of smoke flow multiplicity was affected by the geometry and location of the fire source(s). Our simulation results were in good agreement with previous macroscopic analysis results. A floor fire source can produce the largest smoke flow rate in the buoyancy-dominated flow regime among the tested cases while two corner sources can produce the smallest smoke flow rate. A floor source had a relatively large smoke flow rate in the wind-dominated flow regime while a point source had relatively small smoke flow rate. Moreover, a larger critical buoyancy flux ratio and a larger range of fire power in which smoke flow multiplicity existed were found for a floor fire source than for other sources. Switching of smoke flow solutions in building fires was found to depend on the initial conditions and the magnitude of flow perturbations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Albensoeder S, Kuhlmann HC, Rath HJ (2001). Multiplicity of steady two-dimensional flows in two-sided lid-driven cavities. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 14: 223–241.
Flynn MR, Caulfield CP (2009). Effect of volumetric heat sources on hysteresis phenomena in natural and mixed-mode ventilation. Building and Environment, 44: 216–226.
Gladstone C, Woods AW (2001). On buoyancy-driven natural ventilation of a room with a heated floor. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 441: 293–314.
Gong J, Li Y (2008). Solution multiplicity of smoke flows in a simple building. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 895–906. doi: 10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.9-895.
Heiselberg P, Li Y, Andersen A, Bjerre M, Chen Z (2004). Experimental and CFD evidence of multiple solutions in a naturally ventilated building. Indoor Air, 14: 43–54.
Heskestad G (1986). Fire plume air entrainment according to two competing assumptions. In: Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Combustion, Pittsburgh.
Hunt GR, Linden PF (2004). Displacement and mixing ventilation driven by opposing wind and buoyancy. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 527: 27–55.
Klote JH, Milke JA (1992). Design of Smoke Management Systems. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air- Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
Lee SL, Emmons HW (1961). A study of natural convection above a line source. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 11: 353–368.
Li Y, Delsante A (2001). Natural ventilation induced by combined wind and thermal forces. Building and Environment, 36: 59–71.
Li Y, Delsante A, Chen Z, Sandberg M, Andersen A, Bjerre M, Heiselberg P (2001). Some examples of solution multiplicity in natural ventilation. Building and Environment, 36: 851–858.
Li Y, Xu P, Qian H, Deng Q, Wu J (2006). Flow bifurcation due to opposing buoyancy in two vertically connected open cavities. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 49: 3298–3312.
Linden PF, Lane-Serff GF, Smeed DA (1990). Emptying filling boxes: the fluid mechanics of natural ventilation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 212: 309–335.
Linden PF (1999). The fluid mechanics of natural ventilation. Annual Review Fluid Mechanics, 31: 201–238.
Lishman B, Woods AW (2006). The control of naturally ventilated buildings subject to wind and buoyancy. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 557: 451–471.
Lishman B, Woods AW (2009a). On transitions in natural ventilation flow driven by changes in the wind. Building and Environment, 44: 666–673.
Lishman B, Woods AW (2009b). The effect of gradual changes in wind speed or heat load on natural ventilation in a thermally massive building. Building and Environment, 44: 762–772.
McCaffrey BJ (1979). Purely Buoyant Diffusion Flames: Some Experimental Results. NBSIR 79-1910, National Bureau of Standards.
Morton BR, Taylor G, Turner JS (1956). Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A234: 1–23.
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) (2009). NFPA 92B: Standard for smoke management systems in malls, atria and large spaces. Quincy, MA: NFPA.
Nitta K (1999). Variety modes and chaos in smoke ventilation by ceiling chamber system. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International IBPSA Conference, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 473–480.
Nitta K (2001). Variety modes and chaos in natural ventilation or smoke venting system. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International IBPSA Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 635–642.
Poreh M, Garrad G (2000). A study of wall and corner fire plumes. Fire Safety Journal, 34: 81–98.
Strogatz SH (1994). Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos-with Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Yuan J, Glicksman LR (2007). Transitions between the multiple steady states in a natural ventilation system with combined buoyancy and wind driven flows. Building and Environment, 42: 3500–3516.
Yuan J, Glicksman LR (2008). Multiple steady states in combined buoyancy and wind driven natural ventilation: The conditions for multiple solutions and the critical point for initial conditions. Building and Environment, 43: 62–69.
Yuan LM, Cox G (1996). An experimental study of some line fires. Fire Safety Journal, 27: 123–139.
Zukoski EE, Kubota T, Cetegen B (1980). Entrainment in fire plumes. Fire Safety Journal, 3: 107–121.
Zukoski EE (1995). Properties of fire plume. In: Cox G (ed), Combustion Fundamental of Fire (pp. 101–220). London: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gong, J., Li, Y. CFD modelling of the effect of fire source geometry and location on smoke flow multiplicity. Build. Simul. 3, 205–214 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-010-0004-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-010-0004-5