Abstract
Introduction
Radiotherapy for early vocal cord carcinoma affects quality of voice. Nevertheless, most patients refer to having a high satisfaction level with their voice. The few acoustic studies on quality of voice have been performed only in prolonged vowel production, which is not a usual speech situation. The present study has been done with the aim of establishing which phonetic situations reflect a greater alteration in voice production related to irradiation.
Material and methods
Eighteen male patients irradiated for Tis-T1 vocal cord carcinoma and a control group of 31 non-irradiated subjects were included in a study of acoustic voice analysis. This analysis was performed one year after radiotherapy. Patients and control group voices were tape recorded in extended vowel production, oral reading of a standard paragraph, spontaneous speech and in a song. Acoustic analysis was performed by a Kay Elemetric’s Computerized Speech Lab (model CSL #4300). Fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer and harmonics-to-noise ratio were obtained in both groups. Statistical test: Lin concordance coefficient and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Student’s t-test and ROC curves.
Results
Concordance and correlation studies did not allow selection of any subgroup in acoustic parameters and different acoustic situations. Acoustic parameters had higher median values in irradiated patients. Student’s t-test showed significant differences for fundamental frequency in sustained vowel production and spontaneous speech; for jitter there was statistical significance in all the acoustic situations and for shimmer in oral reading and song. Jitter showed a cut-off of 2.02% with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 97% in classifying irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The ROC curve for jitter correctly classified 94% of subjects into irradiated or non-irradiated groups.
Conclusions
The present study showed that jitter obtained from spontaneous speech was the most relevant parameter in discriminating voice in irradiated patients by acoustic analysis. Jitter in spontaneous speech is in need of more analysis in bigger series and in more advanced stages of larynx cancer as its relevance has been demonstrated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Benninger MS, Gillen J, Thieme P et al (1994) Factors associated with recurrence and voice quality following radiation therapy for T1 and T2 glottic carcinomas. Laryngoscope 104:294–298
Bless DM (1991) Assessment of laryngeal function. In: Ford CN, Bless DM (eds) Phonosurgery: assessment and surgical management of voice disorders. Raven Press Ltd., New York, pp 95–122
Dworking JP, Aref A (1997) Voice laboratory measures following radiation therapy for T1N0 glottic carcinoma. J Med Speech Lang Pathol 5:59–74
Hoyt DJ, Lettinga JW, Leopold KA et al (1992) The effect of head and neck radiation therapy on voice quality. Laryngoscope 102:477–480
Karim ABMF, Snow GB, Siek HTH (1983) The quality of voice in patient irradiated for laryngeal carcinoma. Cancer 51:47–49
Lehman JJ, Bless DM, Brandenburg JH (1998) An objective assessment of voice production after radiation therapy for stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis. Head Neck Surg 98:121–129
McGuirt WF, Blalock D, Koufman JA et al (1994) Comparative voice results after laser resection or irradiation of T1 vocal cord carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:951–955
Miller S, Harrison SM, Solomon B et al (1990) Vocal changes in patients undergoing radiation therapy for glottic carcinoma. Laryngoscope 100:603–606
Stoicheff ML (1975) Voice following radiotherapy. Laryngoscope 85:608–618
Verdonck-de Leew IM (1998) Voice characteristics following radiotherapy: the development of a protocol. In: Studies in language and language use, 33. IFOT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Aref A, Dworkin J, Devi S et al (1997) Objective evaluation of the quality of voice following radiation therapy for T1 glottic cancer. Radiother Oncol 45:149–153
Rovirosa A, Martínez-Celdrán E, Ortega A et al (2000) Acoustic voice analysis after radiotherapy in T1 vocal cord carcinoma: a new approach to the analysis of the voice quality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:73–79
Baken RJ (1997) Fundamental frequency. In: Clinical measurement of speech and voice. Singular Publishing Group, Inc., San Diego, London, pp 125–187
Rydell R, Schalen L, Fex S et al (1995) Voice evaluation before and after laser excision vs radiotherapy of T1A glottic carcinoma. Acta Oncol 115:560–565
Sanderson RJ, Maran AGD (1992) The quantitative analysis of dysphonia. Clin Otolaryngol 17:440–443
Ynanagihara N (1967) Significance of harmonic changes and noise components in hoarseness. J Speech Hear Res 10:531–541
García-Tapia R, Fernández S (1996) Fisiología de la fonación. In: García-Tapia R, Cobeta I (eds) Diagnóstico y tratamiento de los trastornos de la voz. Garsi S.A., Madrid, pp 54–86
Heuillet G, Garson H, Legre A (1997) Une voix pour tous. In: Heuillet G, Garson H, Legre A (eds) Une vois pour tous. Solal Ed, Marseille, chapter 5, pp 77–106
Krom G (1994) Consistency and reliability of voice quality ratings for different types of speech fragments. J Speech Hear Res 37:985–1000
Laver J (1980) Phonatory settings. In: Laver J (ed.) The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 126–131
Laver J (1991) Phonetic and linguistic markers in speech. In: The gift of speech. Papers in the analysis of speech and voice. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 235–264
Le Huche F, Allali A (1990) La voix. In: La voix. Masson Ed., Paris, Vol. 2, Chapter 1, pp 19–32
Morrison M (1996) Valoración del paciente con un transtorno de voz. In: Morrison M, Rammage L, Nichol H (eds) Tratamiento de los trastornos de la voz. Masson, Barcelona, pp 1–54
Rovirosa A, Martinez-Celdrán E, Ortega A et al (1998) Acoustic voice analysis and subjective patient impression after radiotherapy in T1 vocal cord carcinoma. 1st World Congress on Head and Neck Oncology, Spain. Abstract book, p 99
Rovirosa A, Berenguer J, Sánchez-Reyes A et al (1997) Simulation by a diagnostic CT for the early vocal cord carcinoma. Medical Dosimetry 22:13–16
Rovirosa A, Berenguer J, Sánchez-Reyes A et al (1996) Considerations after simulation by a diagnostic CT of 25 T1N0 vocal cord carcinomas. Quality assurance. Radiother Oncol 40:S148
Rovirosa A, Biete A (1997) In relation to the arytenoid edema in the radiotherapy of the early vocal cord cancer: arytenoid shielding and small size of the field. Radiother Oncol 45:209–211
Eskenazi L, Childers DG, Hicks DM (1990) Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. J Speech Hear Res 33:298–306
Feldmann B, Scheneider H, Klinkers H (1981) A multivariate approach for the biometric of comparison analytical methods in clinical chemistry. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 19:121–137
I-kei Lin L (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255–268
Fletcher GH, Klein R (1964) Dose-time-volume relationship in squamous-cell carcinoma of the larynx. Radiology 82:1032–1042
Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Sutherland HJ, Hogg SA et al (1984) Linear analogue self-assessment of voice quality in laryngeal cancer. J Chron Dis 37:917–924
Morgan DAL, Robinson HF, Marsh L et al (1988) Vocal quality 10 years after radiotherapy for early glottic cancer. Clin Radiol 39:295–296
Perez CA (1971) Irradiation in early vocal cord carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol 93:465–472
Sutherland HJ, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Hogg SA et al (1984) Do patients and physicians agree on the assessment of voice quality in laryngeal cancer? J Otolaryngol 13:325–330
Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Keus M, Higlers FJM et al (1999) Consequences of voice impairment in daily life for patients following radiotherapy for early glottic cancer: voice quality, vocal function and vocal performance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44:1071–1078
Askefelt AG, Hammarberg B (1986) Speech waveform perturbation analysis: a perceptual-acoustical comparison of seven measures. J Speech Hear Res 29:50–64
Fitch JL (1990) Consistency of fundamental frequency and perturbation in repeated phonations of sustained vowels, reading and connected speech. J Speech Hear Disorders 55:360–363
Klingholtz F (1990) Acoustic recognition of voice disorders: a comparative study of running speech versus sustained vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 87:2218–2224
Colton RH, Sagerman RH, Chung CT et al (1978) Voice change after radiotherapy. Radiology 127:821–824
Krengly M, Policarpo M, Manfredda I et al (2004) Voice quality after treatment for T1a glottic carcinoma — radiotherapy versus laser cordectomy. Acta Oncol 43:284–289
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rovirosa, Á., Ascaso, C., Abellana, R. et al. Acoustic voice analysis in different phonetic contexts after larynx radiotherapy for T1 vocal cord carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol 10, 168–174 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-008-0175-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-008-0175-z