Abstract
The systems of patent rights in force in Europe today, both at the level of national law and on the regional level, contain general clauses prohibiting the patenting of inventions whose publication and exploitation would be contrary to “ordre public” or morality. Recent years have brought frequent discussion about limiting the possibility of patent protection for biotechnological inventions for ethical reasons. This is undoubtedly a result of the dynamic development in this field in the last several years. Human genome sequencing, the first successful cloning of mammals, and the progress in human stem cell research present humanity with many new questions of an ethical nature. Directive 98/44 of the European Parliament and of the Council of July 6, 1998, on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions created a new basis for patent protection in this field of technology. Based on the European experience to now, however, it must be said that patent law is not the right place to legislate the consequences of the morality of an invention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Edward Armitage, Ivor Davis, “Patents and Morality in Perspective”, Common Law Institute of Intellectual Property, London 1994
A and H’s Application 44 RPC 298
T 356/93 OJ EPO 1995, 545
T 19/90 OJ EPO 1990, 476, see also: OJ EPO 1989, 451 and OJ EPO 1992, 588
Published: Polish Journal of Laws No 119/2003, text 1117
O.J. 1998 L213/13
http://europa.eu.int/comm/european_group_ethics/index_en.htm
Krauß J., Englehard M.: Patente im Zusammenhang mit der menschlichen Stammzellforschung — ethische Aspekte und Übersicht über den Status der Diskussion in Europa und Deutschland GRUR 2003 Heft 12 985
Zwicker J. Mittelungen der deutschen Patentanwälte 94. Jg/2003 Seite 502
Jeanichen H., L. McDonell L., Haley Jr., “From Clones to Claims”, Heymans 2002
G. Kamsatra et al. Patents on Biotechnological Inventions: The E.C. Directive, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2002
Strowel, E. Derclaye Droit d’auteur et numérique: logiciels, bases de données et multimédia, droit belge, européen et comparé, Bruylant, Bruxelles, 2001, 488 p.
E. Derclaye “What is a database? A critical analysis of the definition of a database in the European Database Directive and suggestions for an international definition” [2002] 5 JWIP 6, p. 981–1011.
E. Derclaye “Do sections 3 and 3A of the CDPA violate the Database Directive? A closer look at the definition of a database in the UK and its compatibility with European law” [2002] 10 EIPR 466–479.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Witek, R. Ethics and patentability in biotechnology. SCI ENG ETHICS 11, 105–111 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0062-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0062-8