Abstract
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is receiving considerable attention in the assessment of osteoporosis because of its ease of use, lack of radiation exposure, region of interest, and relatively low costs. These features have made the technique appealing for screening adult and pediatric patients. This article discusses some of the clinical applications, limitations, and strengths of QUS.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References and Recommended Reading
Jahnsen J, Falchj A, Mowoineke L, Aadlend B: Ultrasound measurements of calcaneus for estimation of skeletal status in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Scan J Gastroenterol 1999, 34:7907.
Fries W, Dinca M, Luisetto G, et al.: Calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry of the lumbar spine. Am J Gastroenterol 1998, 93:2339–2344.
Robinson RJ, Carr I, Iqbals J, et al.: Screening for osteoporosis in Crohn’s disease: a detailed evaluation of calcaneal ultrasound. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998, 10:137–140.
Taal, Cassidy MG, Pearson B, et al.: Usefulness of quantitative heel ultrasound compared with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in determining bone mineral density in chronic hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 1999, 14:1917–1921.
Tribl B, Vogelsang H, Pohinka E, et al.: Broadband ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus: a tool for assessment of bone status in patients with chronic renal failure. Acta Radiologica 1998, 39:631–641.
Cheng S, Tylavsky FA, Orwolle S, Rhoj Y, Carbone LD: The role of collagen abnormalities and ultrasound in densitometry assessment: in vivo evidence. Calcif Tissue Int 1999, 64:470–476.
Copollaro C, Gonneli S, Pondrelli C, et al.: Osteogenesis imperfecta: bone turnover, bone density and ultrasound parameters. Calcif Tissue Int 1999, 65:129–132.
Minisolu S, Rosso R, Scarda A, et al.: Quantitative ultrasound assessment of bone in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Calcif Tissue Int 1995, 56:536–538.
Garton M, Martin J, Stewart A, et al.: Changes in bone mass and metabolism after surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. Clin Endocrinol 1995, 42:493–500.
Gomez A, Cotto C, Schott AM, et al.: Hyperthyroidism influences ultrasound bone measurement in the outside calcis. Osteoporos Int 1998, 8:455–459.
Njeh CP, Boivin CM, Langton CM: The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review. Osteoporos Int 1997, 7:7–22.
Gregg EW, Kriska AM, Salamone LM, et al.: The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk. Osteoporo Int 1997, 7:89–99.
Grampp S, Genant HK, Mathur A, et al.: Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination and diagnostic classification. J Bone Mineral Res 1997, 12:697–711. This study evaluates the common methods of noninvasive bone mass measuring techniques. Comparisons are made of data from QCT, hip and spine DXA, radiographic absorptiometry of the hand, and ultrasound from two devices. All devices can identify similar patient parameters, but the WHO T-scoring system could not be indiscriminately applied to all device-measurements. Each device must have its own reference cut-off values.
Gluer CC, Wu CY, Jerges M, et al.: Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int 1994, 55:46–51. A large study evaluating fracture rates and bone ultrasound and DXA. Data show similarity of data from both techniques.
Gluer CC, Wu CY, Genant HC: Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation: an in vitro study. Osteoporos Int 1993, 3:185–191.
Pfeiffer M, Pollachne W, Minne HW: Ultrasound analyses of the calcaneus predict relative risk of the presence of at least one vertebral fracture and reflect different physical qualities of bone in different regions of the skeleton. Horm Metabol Res 1997, 29:76–79.
Porter RW, Miller CG, Grainger D, et al.: Prediction of hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective study. BMJ 1990, 301:638–841.
Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, et al.: Ultrasonic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 1996, 348:511–514. A large prospective study evaluating the ability of ultrasound to predict hip fractures. DXA and ultrasound show similar results.
Bauer CC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, et al.: Broadband ultrasound attenuation predict fracture strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. Arch Intern Med 1997, 157:629–634.
Baran DT, Kelly AM, Karellas A, et al.: Ultrasound attenuation of the outside calcis in women with osteoporosis and hip fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1988, 43:138–142.
Agren M, Karellas A, Leahey D, et al.: Ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus: a sensitive and specific discriminator of osteopenia in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 1991, 48:240–244.
Stewart A, Reid DM, Porter RW: Broadband ultrasound attenuation and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures: which technique discriminates fracture risk? Calcif Tissue Int 1994, 54:466–469. One of the many small studies addressing the controversy of what is better: ultrasound or DXA. This one shows that ROC curves are better for ultrasound and are hip fractures than spinal DXA and hip fractures. The small number of observations in these types of studies limit the usefulness.
Funke M, Kopka L, Vosshenrich R, et al.: Broadband ultrasound attenuation in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: correlation with osteodensitometry and fracture. Radiology 1995, 194:77–81.
Goldstein SR, Nachtigall Le: Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: comparison with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip. Proc Ninth Ann Meet North Am Menopause Soc, September 15–19, 1998.
Ingle BM, Henrey YM, Eastell R: Discrepancies in T-scores using quantitative ultrasound [abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 1999, 14:SU263.
Chen MB, Diessel E, Fan B, et al.: Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to the QUS-2 [abstract]? J Bone Miner Res 1999, 14:SU276.
Nattras S, Orwell E, Tylavsky F, et al.: Male and ethnic reference ranges for the Sahara clinical bone sonometry [abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 1999, 14:SU280.
Danielson ME, Cauley JA, Baker CE, et al.: Familial resemblance of bone mineral density (BMD) and calcaneal ultrasound attenuation: the BMD in mothers and daughters study. J Bone Miner Res 1999, 65:117–120.
Howard GM, Nguyen TV, Harris M, et al.: Genetic and environmental contributions to the association between quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density measurements: a twin study. J Bone Miner Res 1998, 13:1318–1327.
Hadji P, Hara O, Book K, et al.: Age changes of calcaneal ultrasonometry in healthy German women. Calcif Tissue Int 1999, 65:117–120.
Tromp AM, Smit JH, Deeg DJ, Lips P: Quantitative ultrasound measurements of the tibia and calcaneus in comparison with DXA measurements at various skeletal sites. Osteoporos Int 1999, 9:230–235.
Danese RD, Licata AA, Richmond B, Deal C: Calcaneal ultrasound-influence of activity in comparison with standard DEXA measurements in a general clinical practice. World Congress on Osteoporosis 2000, Chicago, IL, June 15–18, 2000.
Brooks-Wavell K, Jones RR, Pye DW: Ultrasound and dual x-ray absorptiometry measurement of the calcaneus: influence of region of interest location. Calcif Tissue Int 1995, 57:20–24.
van Daele PL, Burger H, DeLact CE, et al.: Longitudinal changes and ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus. Osteoporos Int 1997, 7:207–212. This investigation addresses the question of long-term reproducibility of ultrasound testing. It shows error rates in measuring speed of sound (SOS) and bone attenuation (BUA) over 1 to 2 years that are only partly related to measurement errors. This finding limits use of ultrasound as a monitoring tool in an individual patient.
Fournier B, Chappard C, Roux C, et al.: Quantitative ultrasound imaging at the calcaneus using an automatic region of interest. Osteoporos Int 1997, 7:363–369.
Jorgensen HL, Hassager C: Improved reproducibility of broadband ultrasound attenuation of the os calcis by using a specific region of interest. Bone 1997, 21:109–112. Investigators show that a consistent anatomic region of interest can improve reproducibility of heel ultrasound. By so doing, they reduce the coefficient of variation from 3.7% on duplicate measures to 1.2%.
Chappard C, Laugier P, Fournier B, et al.: Assessment of the relationship between broad band ultrasound attenuation and bone mineral density at the calcaneus using BUA imaging and DXA. Osteoporos Int 1997, 7:316–322. The region of interest in calcaneal ultrasound is studied in this paper. The correlation between hip DXA and ultrasound varies from 0.78 to 0.91 as a function of region measured. An important issue for clinical use.
Kolthoff N, Eikan P, Barenholdt O, Nielsen SP: Vital ultrasound measurements of the os calcis stewards: side differences and prediction of bone density in 39 persons. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1995, 66:278–282.
Leong KH: Ultrasound of the tibia-precision error, left versus right sides in correlation with bone mineral density. Annals Acad Med Singapore 1997, 26:747–749.
Wang SF, Chang CY, Shih C, Teng MM: Evaluation of tibial cortical bone by ultrasound velocity in oriental females. Br J Radio 1997, 7:1126–1130.
Lee SE, Con BS, Bouxsein ML: Tibial ultrasound velocity measured in situ predicts the material properties of tibial cortical bone. Bone 1997, 21:119–125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Danese, R.D., Licata, A.A. Ultrasound of the skeleton: Review of its clinical applications and pitfalls. Curr Rheumatol Rep 3, 245–248 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-001-0025-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-001-0025-2