Abstract
The double deficit hypothesis (Bowers and Wolf 1993) maintains that children with both phonological and naming-speed deficits will be poorer readers than children with just one or neither of these deficits. In the present study, we drew on this hypothesis to help understand why some children have a serious reading impairment. In addition, by adding an orthographic factor, we extended it to a triple deficit hypothesis. Participants were 90 children aged 6 to 10 years. Dyslexic children, whose reading was low for age and for expected level, garden-variety poor readers, reading-level matched younger children, and low verbal IQ good readers, were compared. The dyslexic group was significantly lower then the garden-variety poor readers and the low verbal IQ good readers on most measures, and lower than the younger group on phonological measures. Findings support the double deficit hypothesis of Bowers and Wolf, and also the triple deficit hypothesis. Most of the poorest readers, nearly all of whom qualified as dyslexic, had a double or triple deficit in phonological, naming-speed, and orthographic skills. Conclusions were that dyslexia results from an overload of deficits in skills related to reading, for which the child cannot easily compensate.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adams, M. J., and Bruck, M. 1993. Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5:113–39.
Badian, N. A. 1993. Predicting reading progress in children receiving special help. Annals of Dyslexia 43:90–109.
Badian, N. A. 1996. Dyslexia: A validation of the concept at two age levels. Journal of Learning Disabilities 29:102–12.
Ball, E. W. 1993. Phonological awareness: What’s important and to whom? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5:141–59.
Berninger, V. W. 1990. Multiple orthographic codes: Key to alternative methodologies for developing orthographic-phonological connections underlying word identification. School Psychology Review 19:518–33.
Bowers, P. G., and Swanson, L. B. 1991. Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a singular process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 51:195–219.
Bowers, P. G., and Wolf, M. 1993. Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5:69–85.
Cunningham, A. E., and Stanovich, K. E. 1990. Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology 82:733–40.
Denckla, M. B., and Rudel, R. 1974. Rapid “automatized” naming of pictured objects, colors, letters and numbers by normal children. Cortex 10:186–202.
Ehri, L. C. 1992. Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In Reading Acquisition, eds. P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, and R. Treiman. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goswami, U., and Bryant, P. 1989. The interpretation of studies using the reading level design. Journal of Reading Behavior 21:413–24.
Gough, P. B., and Tunmer, W. E. 1986. Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education 7:6–10.
Healy, J. M. 1982. The enigma of hyperlexia. Reading Research Quarterly 17:319–38.
Jordan, B. T. 1980. Jordan Left-Right Reversal Test. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy.
Kail, R., and Hall, L. K. 1994. Processing speed, naming speed, and reading. Developmental Psychology 30:949–54.
Liberman, I. Y., and Shankweiler, D. 1985. Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write. Remedial and Special Education 6:8–17.
Lyon, G. R. 1995. Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia 45:3–27.
Manis, F. R., Szeszulski, P. A., Holt, L. T., and Graves, K. 1990. Variation in component word recognition and spelling skills among dyslexic children and normal readers. In Reading and its Development: Component Skills Approaches, eds. T. H. Carr and B. A. Levy. San Diego: Academic Press.
McBride-Chang, C., and Manis, F. R. 1996. Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test of the double deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 8:323–39.
Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., and Fulker, D. 1989. Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:339–48.
Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., and Rack, J. 1994. Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues, ed. G. R. Lyon. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing Co.
Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., and Olson, R. K. 1992. The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly 27:29–53.
Rosner, J. 1979. Helping Children Overcome Learning Difficulties. New York: Walker.
Rosner, J., and Simon, D.P. 1971. The Auditory Analysis Test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities 4:384–92.
Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., Holahan, J., and Shaywitz, S. E. 1992. Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability: Results from the Connecticut longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities 25:639–48.
Stanovich, K. E. 1988. Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities 21:590–604, 612.
Stanovich, K. E. 1992. Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. In Reading Acquisition, eds. P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, and R. Treiman. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vellutino, F. R., and Scanlon, D. M. 1989. Some prerequisites for interpreting results from reading level matched designs. Journal of Reading Behavior 21:361–85.
Wagner, R. K., and Torgesen, J. K. 1987. The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin 101:192–212.
Wechsler, D. 1974. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Wechsler, D. 1989. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Wechsler, D. 1991. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Wolf, M. 1991. Naming speed and reading: The contributions of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly 26:123–41.
Wolf, M. In press. A provisional, integrative account of phonological and naming-speed deficits in dyslexia: Implications for diagnosis and intervention. In Cognitive and Linguistic Foundations of Reading Acquisition: Implications for Intervention Research, ed. B. Blachman. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Woodcock, R. W. 1987. Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Yap, R., and van der Leij, A. 1993. Word processing in dyslexics: An automatic decoding deficit? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5:261–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Badian, N.A. Dyslexia and the double deficit hypothesis. Ann. of Dyslexia 47, 69–87 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-997-0021-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-997-0021-y