Résumé
Le choix des tests biologiques, leur utilité, leurs résultats sont souvent au centre d’interrogations polémiques. Cet article apporte un commentaire de plus à la réflexion, en se basant sur quelques articles récents publiés dans la littérature scientifique internationale.
Abstract
The choice of medical tests, their purposes, and their results are often at the centre of controversy. This article provides an additional perspective based on a number of recent reports published in the international scientific literature.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Références
Ehrmeyer SS, Laessig RH (2006). Regulatory compliance vs. NEXUS quality for laboratory tests. Accred Qual Assur 11: 265
Boone DJ (2004) Is it safe to have a laboratory test? Accred Qual Assur 10: 5
van Duijn NP (2006) Predictive values instead of normal ranges: less data, more information. Accred Qual Assur (2006) 11: 269
Plebani M, Carraro P (1997) Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency. Clin Chem 43(8 Pt 1): 1348–51
Bonini F, Flebani M, Ceriotti F, et al. (2002) Errors in laboratory medecine. Clin Chem 48: 691–8
Schleicher E (2006) The clinical chemistry laboratory: current status, problems and diagnostic prospects. Anal Bioanal Chem 384: 124–31
Lire également Biotribune no 19 (2006) sur la biologie délocalisée.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zosimo-Landolfo, G. Fonctionnalité, finalité et fiabilité des tests médicaux. Bio trib. mag. 22 (Suppl 1), 33–34 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11834-007-0008-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11834-007-0008-3