Abstract
A microchannel was fabricated with glass tubes to investigate the effect of viscosity, surface tension, and flow rate on the liquid-liquid two-phase flow regime. Water and gasoil were selected as aqueous and organic working fluids, respectively. The two fluids were injected into the microchannel and created either slug or parallel profile depending on the applied conditions. The range of Reynolds and capillary numbers was chosen in such a way that neither inertia nor interfacial tension forces were negligible. Xanthan gum was used to increase viscosity and Triton X-100 (TX-100) and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) were used to reduce the interfacial tension. The results demonstrated that higher value of viscosity and flow rate increased interfacial area, but slug flow regime remained unchanged. The two surfactants showed different effects on the flow regime and interfacial area. Addition of TX-100 did not change the slug flow but decreased the interfacial area. In contrast, addition of SDS increased interfacial area by decreasing the slug’s length in the low concentrations and by switching from slug to parallel regime at high concentrations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
E. H. Cao, W. B. Motherwell and A. Gavriilidis, Chem. Eng. Technol., 29, 1372 (2006).
K. Wang, Y.C. Lu, J. H. Xu, X. C. Gong and G. S. Luo, AIChE J., 52, 4207 (2006).
D. Huang, Y.C. Lu, Y. J. Wang, L. Yang and G. S. Luo, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47, 3870 (2008).
P. Z. Plazl and I. Plazl, Process Biochem., 44, 1115 (2009).
P. L. Mills, D. J. Quiram and James F. Ryley, Chem. Eng. Sci., 62, 6992 (2007).
P. Zaloha, J. Kristal, V. Jiricny, N. Volkel, C. Xuereb and J. Aubin, Chem. Eng. Sci., 68, 640 (2012).
T. Zhang, B. Cao, Y. Fan, Y. Gonthier, L. Luo and S. Wang, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66, 5791 (2011).
N. Aoki, S. Tanigawa and K. Mae, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66, 6536 (2011).
C. Choi, D. I. Yu and M. Kim, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 35, 1086 (2011).
P. Sobieszuk, R. Pohorecki, P. Cyganski and J. Grzelka, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66, 6048 (2011).
Y. YuMei, Y. Chao, J. Yi, J. Ameya, S. YouChun and Y. XiaoLong, Sci. China Chem., 54, 244 (2011).
A. Dessimoz, L. Cavin, A. Renken and L. Kiwi-Minsker, Chem. Eng. Sci., 63, 4035 (2008).
M.N. Kashid, I. Gerlach, S. Goetz, J. Franzke, J. F. Acker, F. Platte, D.W. Agar and S. Turek, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44, 5003 (2005).
G. Dummann, U. Quittmann, L. Gröschel, D.W. Agar, O. Wörz and K. Morgenschweis, Catal. Today, 79, 433 (2003).
Y. Zhao, Y. Su, G. Chen and Q. Yuan, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65, 1563 (2010).
N. Harries, J.R. Burns, D. A. Barrow and C. Ramshaw, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 46, 3313 (2003).
J. Tan, J. H. Xu, S.W. Li and G. S. Luo, Chem. Eng. J., 136, 306 (2008).
J. R. Burns and C. Ramshaw, Lab on a Chip, 1, 10 (2001).
M. N. Kashid and D.W. Agar, Chem. Eng. J., 131, 1 (2007).
M. Kashid and L. Kiwi-Minsker, Chem. Eng. Process., DOI:10.1016/j.cep.2011.07.003.
H. Foroughi and M. Kawaji, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 37, 1147 (2011).
P. Guillot and A. Colin, Physical Review, 72, 066301 (2005).
T. Cubaud and T. G. Mason, Phys. Fluids, 20, 053302 (2008).
Y. Su, Y. Zhao, G. Chen and Q. Yuan, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65, 3947 (2010).
Z. Xuewu, L. Xin, G. Dexiang, Z. Wei, X. Tong and M. Yonghong, J. Food Eng., 27, 203 (1996).
D. D. Joseph, J. Fluid Mech., 141, 309 (1984).
O. A. Soboleva, G. A. Badun and B. D. Summ, VestnikMoskovskogoUniversiteta, Khimiya, 1, 17 (2007).
D. Erdogan, Izmir University of technology, Master of Science Thesis (2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boogar, R.S., Gheshlaghi, R. & Mahdavi, M.A. The effects of viscosity, surface tension, and flow rate on gasoil-water flow pattern in microchannels. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 30, 45–49 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-012-0119-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-012-0119-8