Abstract
The temperature- and frequency-dependent dynamic-mechanical properties in the temperature regime of the γ-transition were determined for a number of polyethylenes and ethylene/α-olefin-copolymers differing in their crystallinity and crystal morphology. The temperature dependence of the γ-transition was found to obey the Arrhenius law for thermally activated processes. The γ-transition temperature determined at a frequency of 1 Hz and the corresponding activation energy were analyzed as a function of the crystallinity. As an overall trend, both quantities are found to decrease with decreasing crystallinity, which is explained by the increase in free volume due to the incorporation of short-chain branches or the thermal pretreatment (e.g., quenching). Taking into account that the crystal morphology of polyethylenes can be classified into four different groups, a more detailed picture appears. Within one type of morphology both quantities, namely the transition temperature and the activation energy, increase with decreasing crystallinity independent of the α-olefin used as the comonomer. These findings can be explained by partial orientations of the molecule segments in the interlamellar amorphous space in the case of HDPE or by the increased steric hindrance of the crankshaft motion by the short-chain branches. From the findings of this series of studies, it was concluded that the glass transition in polyethylene and polyethylene/α-olefin-copolymers is the β- and not the γ-transition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
F. C. Stehling and L. Mandelkern, Macromolecules, 3(2), 242 (1970).
G. Hartwig, Polymer properties at room and cryogenic temperatures, New York, Plenum Press (1994).
K. Illers, Coll. Polym. Sci., 251, 394 (1973).
K. Illers, Coll. Polym. Sci., 252, 1 (1974).
Y. Khanna, E. Turi, T. Taylor, V. Vickroy and R. Abbott, Macromolecules, 18, 1302 (1985).
R.G. Matthews, A. P. Unwin, I. M. Ward and G. Capaccio, Journal of Macromolecular Science-Physics, B38,1–2, 123 (1999).
S. D. Clas, D. C. Mcfaddin and K. E. Russell, J. Polym. Sci. Part B-Polym. Phys., 25,5, 1057 (1987).
K. Jordens, G. L. Wilkes, J. Janzen, D. C. Rohlfing and M. B. Welch, Polymer, 41,19, 7175 (2000).
M. L. Cerrada, R. Benavente, B. Pena and E. Perez, Polymer, 41,15, 5957 (2000).
K. H. Nitta and A. Tanaka, Polymer, 42, 1219 (2001).
C. L. P. Shan, J. B. P. Soares and A. Penlidis, Polymer, 43,3, 767 (2002).
R. Benavente, E. Perez, M. Yazdani-Pedram and R. Quijada, Polymer, 43,25, 6821 (2002).
R. H. Boyd, Polymer, 26, 323 (1985).
I. M. Ward and D.W. Hadley, The yield behaviour of polymers, In Sons, J.W., Ed., Polymer, Chichester, England, 11, 213 (1993).
R. Boyer, Rubber Chem. Technol., 34, 1303 (1963).
T. Shatzki, J. Polym. Sci., 57, 496 (1962).
R. H. Boyd, Polymer, 26, 1123 (1985).
F. J. Stadler, J. Kaschta and H. Münstedt, Polymer, 46(23), 10311 (2005).
F. J. Stadler, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(3), 954 (2011).
F. J. Stadler, J. Kaschta and H. Münstedt, Macromolecules, 41(4), 1328 (2008).
J. A. Resch, F. J. Stadler, J. Kaschta and H. Münstedt, Macromolecules, 42(15), 5676 (2009).
F. S. Bates, J. H. Rosedale and G. H. Fredrickson, J. Chem. Phys., 92(10), 6255 (1990).
K. Almdal, F. S. Bates and K. Mortensen, J. Chem. Phys., 96(12), 9122 (1992).
F. J. Stadler, Express Polym. Lett., 5(4), 327 (2011).
U. Gaur and B. Wunderlich, Macromolecules, 13(6), 1618 (1980).
L. Leibler, Macromolecules, 13(6), 1602 (1980).
E. Laredo, N. Suarez, A. Bello and L. Marquez, J. Polym. Sci. Part B-Polym. Phys., 34(4), 641 (1996).
E. Laredo, N. Suarez, A. Bello, B. R. d. Gascue, M.A. Gomez and J.M.G. Fatou, Polymer, 40, 6405 (1999).
S. Bensason, S. Nazarenko, S. Chum, A. Hiltner and E. Baer, Polymer, 38, 14, 3513 (1997).
F. J. Stadler, T. Takahashi and K. Yonetake, e-Polymers, 40 (2009).
F. J. Stadler, T. Takahashi and K. Yonetake, e-Polymers, 41 (2009).
B. S. Tanem and A. Stori, Polymer, 42, 6609 (2001).
S. Głowinkowski, M. Makrocka-Rydzyk, S. Wanke and S. Jurga, European Polymer Journal, 38,5, 961 (2002).
Most of the activation energies determined were significantly larger than the value of 38 kJ/mol reported by Głowinkowski et al. [33]and Hartwig [2]. The reason for these differences might lie in the measurement method, as both groups determined the activation energy by NMR, which seems not to produce comparable results with dynamic-mechanical measurements due to the different length scales being analyzed (see also part II of this series [19]).
R. Popli, M. Glotin and L. Mandelkern, J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys., 407 (1983).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper is dedicated to Professor Ki Ju Kim for celebrating his retirement from Division of Chemical Engineering of Chonbuk National University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stadler, F.J. Dynamic-mechanical behavior of polyethylenes and ethene-/α-olefin-copolymers: Part III. γ-relaxation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 28, 2057–2063 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0080-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0080-y