Abstract
For biological nitrogen (N) removal from wastewater, a sufficient organic carbon source is requested for denitrification. However, the organic carbon/nitrogen ratio in municipal wastewater is becoming lower in recent years, which increases the demand for the addition of external organic carbon, e.g. methanol, in wastewater treatment. The volatile fatty acids (VFAs) produced by acidogenic fermentation of sewage sludge can be an attractive alternative for methanol. Chemically enhanced primary sedimentation (CEPS) is an effective process that applies chemical coagulants to enhance the removal of organic pollutants and phosphorus from wastewater by sedimentation. In terms of the chemical and biological characteristics, the CEPS sludge is considerably different from the conventional primary and secondary sludge. In the present study, FeCl3 and PACl (polyaluminum chloride) were used as the coagulants for CEPS treatment of raw sewage. The derived CEPS sludge (Fe-sludge and Al-sludge) was then processed with mesophilic acidogenic fermentation to hydrolyse the solid organics and produce VFAs for organic carbon recovery, and the sludge acidogenesis efficiency was compared with that of the conventional primary sludge and secondary sludge. The results showed that the Fe-sludge exhibited the highest hydrolysis and acidogenesis efficiency, while the Al-sludge and secondary sludge had lower hydrolysis efficiency than that of primary sludge. Utilizing the Fe-sludge fermentation liquid as the carbon source for denitrification, more than 99% of nitrate removal was achieved in the main-stream wastewater treatment without any external carbon addition, instead of 35% obtained from the conventional process of primary sedimentation followed by the oxic/anoxic (O/A) treatment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andreasen K, Petersen G, Thomsen H, Strube R (1997). Reduction of nutrient emission by sludge hydrolysis. Water Sci Technol, 35(10): 79–85
APHA (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association. Washington, DC
Bandosz T J, Block K (2006). Effect of pyrolysis temperature and time on catalytic performance of sewage sludge/industrial sludge-based composite adsorbents. Appl Catal B, 67(1): 77–85
Burgess J E, Pletschke B I (2008). Hydrolytic enzymes in sewage sludge treatment: A mini-review. Water SA, 34(3): 343–350
Chen Y, Jiang S, Yuan H, Zhou Q, Gu G (2007). Hydrolysis and acidification of waste activated sludge at different pHs. Water Res, 41 (3): 683–689
de Barbadillo C, Miller P, Ledwell S A (2008). Comparison of operating issues and dosing requirements for alternative carbon sources in denitrification filters. Proc Water Environ Fed, 9(9): 6603–6617
Dentel S K, Gossett J M (1982). Effect of chemical coagulation on anaerobic digestibility of organic materials. Water Res, 16(5): 707–718
Elefsiniotis P, Li D (2006). The effect of temperature and carbon source on denitrification using volatile fatty acids. Biochem Eng J, 28(2): 148–155
Elefsiniotis P, Wareham D G, Smith M O (2004). Use of volatile fatty acids from an acid-phase digester for denitrification. J Biotechnol, 114(3): 289–297
EPD (2016). Environmental Production Department, Hong Kong Government. Available online at https://doi.org/www.epd.gov.hk (accessed February 26, 2018)
Latker E, Jones C, Primicierio J (2011). Operation of four denitrification plants in the Florida Keys to meet Florida Chapter 99395: Comparative data from the use of alternative carbon sources in sequencing batch reactors. Proc Water Environ Fed, 1: 376–393
Lin L, Li R H, Li Y, Xu J, Li X Y (2017a). Recovery of organic carbon and phosphorus from wastewater by Fe-enhanced primary sedimentation and sludge fermentation. Process Biochem, 54: 135–139
Lin L, Li R H, Yang Z Y, Li X Y (2017b). Effect of coagulant on acidogenic fermentation of sludge from enhanced primary sedimentation for resource recovery: Comparison between FeCl3 and PACl. Chem Eng J, 325: 681–689
Mao T, Hong S Y, Show K Y, Tay J H, Lee D J (2004). A comparison of ultrasound treatment on primary and secondary sludges. Water Sci Technol, 50(9): 91–97
Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. (2003). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill
Soares A, Kampas P, Maillard S, Wood E, Brigg J, Tillotson M, Parsons S A, Cartmell E (2010). Comparison between disintegrated and fermented sewage sludge for production of a carbon source suitable for biological nutrient removal. J Hazard Mater, 175(1-3): 733–739
Ucisik A S, Henze M (2008). Biological hydrolysis and acidification of sludge under anaerobic conditions: the effect of sludge type and origin on the production and composition of volatile fatty acids. Water Res, 42(14): 3729–3738
Wang H, Li F, Keller A A, Xu R (2009). Chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) for removal of carbon and nutrients from municipal wastewater treatment plants: a case study of Shanghai. Water Sci Technol, 60(7): 1803–1809
Wei J C, Gao B Y, Yue Q Y, Wang Y, Lu L (2009). Performance and mechanism of polyferric-quaternary ammonium salt composite flocculants in treating high organic matter and high alkalinity surface water. J Hazard Mater, 165(1-3): 789–795
Wei Y, Van Houten R T, Borger A R, Eikelboom D H, Fan Y (2003). Minimization of excess sludge production for biological wastewater treatment. Water Res, 37(18): 4453–4467
Yu G H, He P J, Shao L M, Zhu Y S (2008). Extracellular proteins, polysaccharides and enzymes impact on sludge aerobic digestion after ultrasonic pretreatment. Water Res, 42(8-9): 1925–1934
Zhou A, Liu W, Varrone C, Wang Y, Wang A, Yue X (2015). Evaluation of surfactants on waste activated sludge fermentation by pyrosequencing analysis. Bioresour Technol, 192: 835–840
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants 17204914, 17261916, C7044-14G and T21-711/16-R from the Research Grants Council (RGC) of the Hong Kong SAR Government, and Project JCYJ20150630170146833 from Shenzhen Municipal Science and Technology Innovation Council of Shenzhen Government, China. The technical assistance of Mr. Keith C.H. Wong is greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, L., Li, Yy. & Li, Xy. Acidogenic sludge fermentation to recover soluble organics as the carbon source for denitrification in wastewater treatment: Comparison of sludge types. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 12, 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1043-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1043-x