Abstract
Several new processes for milling corn have been developed recently specifically to isolate germ as a value-added co-product and improve the profitability of dry-grind ethanol production. The present work used modified and conventional corn milling technologies to recover germ fractions from corn kernels using either wet or dry separation processes. This study determined the quality, composition, and yield differences among the corn germ produced and compared these properties with those of the conventional wet- and dry-milled germ. A method for calculating the estimated market value for germ produced by the alternative processing methods is given. There were significant differences in the oil, protein, starch, and ash compositions and in the estimated market values among germ fractions produced by the alternative milling processes. The different germ fractions produced (including the traditional wet-and dry-milled) were found to contain 18–41% oil, 13–21% protein, and 6–21% starch, depending on the milling process used. The estimated value of germ from these processes varied from as low as $0.058/lb ($0.128/kg) to a maximum of $0.114/lb ($0.251/kg), showing that the specific process used to produce the germ will have the major impact on the overall economics of the ethanol process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agricultural Statistics Board, Crop Production Summary, National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA, Washington, DC, 2004.
Johnson, L.A., and J.B. May, Wet Milling: The Basis for Corn Biorefineries, in Corn Chemistry and Technology, edited by P.J. White and L.A. Johnson, American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, Minnesota, 2003, pp. 449–494.
Corn Refiners Association, Inc., Corn Annual, Corn Refiners Association, Washington, DC, 2003.
Willard, J.D., A.B. Roskens, and R.J. Alexander, Corn Dry Milling: Processes, Products and Applications, in Corn Chemistry and Technology, edited by P.J. White and L.A. Johnson, American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, Minnesota, 2003, pp. 407–447.
Johnston, D.B., and V. Singh, Enzymatic Milling of Corn: Optimization of Soaking, Grinding, and Enzyme Incubation Steps, Cereal Chem. 81:626–632 (2004).
American Association of Cereal Chemists, AACC Methods 44-15A and 76-13, in Approved Methods of the AACCI, 10th edn., AACC, St. Paul, Minnesota, 2000.
Moreau, R.A., M.J. Powell, and K.B. Hicks, Extraction and Quantitative Analysis of Oil from Commercial Corn Fiber, J. Agric. Food Chem. 44:2149–2154 (1996).
Eckhoff, S.R., K.D. Rausch, E.J. Fox, C.C. Tso, X. Wu, Z. Pan, and P. Buriak, A Laboratory Wet-Milling Procedure to Increase Reproducibility and Accuracy of Product Yields, Cereal Chem. 70:723–727 (1993).
Singh, V., and S.R. Eckhoff, Effect of Soak Time, Soak Temperature, and Lactic Acid on Germ Recovery Parameters, Cereal Chem. 73:716–720 (1996).
Johnston, D.B. and V. Singh, Use of Proteases to Reduce Steep Time and SO2 Requirements in a Corn Wet-Milling Process, Cereal Chem. 78:405–411 (2001).
Du, L., K.D. Rausch, P. Yang, E.A.M. Uriyo, A.D. Small, M.E. Tumbleson, J.M. Faubion, and S.R. Eckhoff, Comparison of Alkali and Conventional Corn Wet-Milling: 1-kg Procedures, Cereal Chem. 76:811–815 (1999).
Blanchard, P.H., Technology of Corn Wet Milling and Associated Processes, in Industrial Chemistry Library, Vol. 4, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 73 and 528.
Earle, F.R., J.J. Curtis, and J.E. Hubbard, Composition of the Component Parts of the Corn Kernel, Cereal Chem. 23:405–511 (1946).
Ash, M., and E. Dohlman, Oil Crops Outlook, National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA, Washington, DC, 2004.
Renewable Fuel News [newsletter], Hart Energy Publishing, LP. Vol. XVI, No. 28 (2004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Johnston, D.B., McAloon, A.J., Moreau, R.A. et al. Composition and economic comparison of germ fractions from modified corn processing technologies. J Amer Oil Chem Soc 82, 603–608 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-005-1116-z
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-005-1116-z