Abstract
This essay seeks to introduce representative beliefs, attitudes, policies, and practices from the Confucian tradition concerning the ethical aspects of abortion and bring these into productive engagement with some of the best and most influential philosophical accounts of abortion available in contemporary Anglo-American philosophy. The essay begins with a discussion of the ethical dimensions of abortion and a critical review of two of the best and most influential contemporary Western accounts; it then moves on to describe and discuss an alternative Confucian approach. The aims are to demonstrate the resources within the Confucian tradition for providing a distinctive philosophical account of abortion and to show that comparative work has the potential to augment, amend, and ultimately enrich our understanding of this morally challenging aspect of human life.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ames, Roger T. and Henry Rosemont Jr., trans. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.
Beckwith, Francis J. 1998. “Arguments from Bodily Rights: A Critical Analysis.” In The Abortion Controversy: 25 Years After Roe v. Wade: A Reader. Edited by Louis P. Pojman and Francis J. Beckwith. Second Edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Brody, Baruch. 1972. “Thomson on Abortion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1.3: 335–40.
Furth, Charlotte. 1999. A Flourishing of Yin: Gender in China’s Medical History, 960-1665. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Gibbard, Allan. 1990. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Huang Chun-chieh. 2010. “East Asian Conceptions of the Public and Private Realms.” In Taking Confucian Ethics Seriously: Contemporary Theories and Applications. Edited by Julia Tao, Yu Kam Por, and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1997. “Virtue Theory and Abortion.” In Virtue Ethics. Edited by Roger Crisp and Michael Slote. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hutton, Eric L. 2001. Virtue and Reason in Xunzi. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2009. “Pluralism, Tolerance, and Ethical Promiscuity.” The Journal of Religious Ethics. 37.2: 311–329.
Keown, Damien, ed. 1999. Buddhism and Abortion. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Kline, T. C. III. 2004. “Moral Cultivation Through Ritual Participation: Xunzi’s Philosophy of Ritual.” In Thinking Through Rituals. Edited by Kevin Schilbrack. New York: Routledge.
LaFleur, William R. 1992. Liquid Life: Abortion and Buddhism In Japan. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Lee, Pauline Chen. 2000. “Li Zhi and John Stuart Mill: A Confucian Feminist Critique of Liberal Feminism” In The Sage and the Second Sex: Confucianism, Ethics, and Gender. Edited by Li Chenyang. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.
Messer, Ellen and Kathryn E. May, eds. 1994. Back Rooms: Voices from the Illegal Abortion Era. Reprint. Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
Sandel, Michael J. 1998. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Revised Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1971. “A Defense of Abortion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1.1: 47–66.
Wilcox, John T. 2001. “Nature as Demonic in Thomson’s Defense of Abortion.” In The Ethics of Abortion. Edited by Robert M. Baird and Stuart E. Rosenbaum. Third Edition. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Wolf, Naomi. 2001. “Our Bodies, Our Souls,” In The Ethics of Abortion. Edited by Robert M. Baird and Stuart E. Rosenbaum. Third Edition. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Yu Kam Por. 2010. “The Handling of Multiple Values in Confucian Ethics.” In Taking Confucian Ethics Seriously: Contemporary Theories and Applications. Edited by Julia Tao, Yu Kam Por, and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivanhoe, P.J. A Confucian Perspective on Abortion. Dao 9, 37–51 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-009-9146-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-009-9146-5