Abstract
We studied variations in tree biomass and carbon sequestration rates of Chir Pine (Pinus roxburghii. Sarg.) forest in three categories of forest disturbance, protected, moderately disturbed, and highly disturbed. In the first year, total biomass was 14.7 t·ha−1 in highly disturbed site, 94.46 t·ha−1 in moderately disturbed forest, and 112.0 t·ha−1 in protected forest. The soil organic carbon in the top 20 cm of soil ranged from 0.63 to 1.2%. The total rate of carbon sequestration was 0.60 (t/ha)·a−1 on the highly disturbed site, 1.03 (t/ha)·a−1 on the moderately disturbed site, and 4.3 (t/ha)·a−1 on the protected site.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anonymous. 2004. Methodology for data collection and analysis for biomass and soil carbon estimation, Developed by Dr. Ashish Tewari project.
Chaturvedi OP. 1983. Biomass structure, productivity and nutrient cycling in Pinus roxburghii forests. Ph.D thesis submitted to Department of Botany, Kumaun University, India.
Chauhan PS, Manhas RK, Bhandari D, Negi JDS. 2004. Carbon stock assessment in old growth Pinus roxburghii Spreng. plantation of forest research institute, new forest, Dehradun, India. Indian Journal of Forestry, 27(1): 45–49.
Chaturvedi OP, Singh JS. 1987a. A quantitative study of the forest floor biomass, litter fall and nutrient return in Pinus roxburghii forest in Kumaun Himalaya, Vegetatio, 71(2): 97–106.
Chaturvedi OP, Singh JS. 1987b. The structure and function of pine forests in Central Himalaya-1. Dry matter dynamics. Annals of Botany, 60: 237–252.
Chaturvedi RK, Gopalakrishnan R, Jayaraman M, Bala G, Joshi NV, Raman S, Ravindranath NH. 2010. Impact of climate change on Indian forests: a dynamic vegetation modeling approach, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Chang, 16(2): 119–142.
Curtis RO, Post BW. 1964. Estimating bulk density from organic matter content in some vermont forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 28(2): 285–286.
Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. 1950. The Interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology, 31: 434–455.
Haripriya GS. 2003. Carbon budget of the Indian forest ecosystem. Climatic Change, 56: 300–301.
Jackson ML. 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. USA: Prentice Hall Inc., p. 498.
Jina BS. 2006. Monitoring and estimating carbon sequestration in Oak and Pine forests of varying level of disturbances in Kumaun Central Himalaya. Ph.D. thesis, Nainital, Uttrakhand, India: Department of Botany, Kumaun University, India.
Jina BS, Sah P, Bhatt MD, Rawat YS. 2008. Estimating carbon sequestration rates and total carbon stockpile in degraded and non-degraded sites of Oak and Pine forest of Kumaun Central Himalaya. Ecoprint, 15:75–81.
McDicken K. 1997. A guide to monitoring carbon storage in Forestry & Agroforestry projects. Arlington (V.A.): Winrock International institute for agricultural Development.
Rawat YS, Singh S. 1988. Structure and function of oak forests in central Himalaya. II. Dry matter dynamics. Annals of Botany, 62(4): 413–427.
Rastogi M, Singh S, Pathak H. 2002. Emission of carbon dioxide from soil. Current Science, 82(5): 510–517.
Raikwal D. 2009. Effect of leaf litter removal on soil nutrients in the central Himalayan banj oak and chir pine forests with relation to carbon sequestration. Ph.D thesis in Botany submitted to Kumaun University, Nainital.
Ravindranath NH, Joshi NV, Sukumar R, Saxena A. 2006. Impact of climate change on forests of India. Current Science, 90(3): 354–361.
Rikhari HC, Ralhan PK, Singh SP. 1989, Phytosociology and population structure of Chir Pine forests in Kumaun Himalayas, Annals of Biology, 5(2):129–140.
Saxena AK, Singh JS. 1982. A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalaya. Vegetatios, 50: 3–22.
Seth SK. 1980. Forests and forestry in Himalayan region. In: Proceedings of National Seminar on Resource Development and Environment in the Himalayan Region. New Delhi: Department of Science and Technology, pp. 70–79.
Singh JS, Tiwari AK, Saxena AK. 1985. Himalayan forests: A net source of carbon to the atmosphere. Environment Conservation, 12: 67–69.
Singh JS, Singh SP. 1992. Forests of the Himalaya: Structure, functioning and impact of man. Gyanodaya Prakashan, p. 84, 89, 142.
Singh SP. 2002. Balancing the approaches of environmental conservation by considering ecosystem services as well as biodiversity. Current Science, 82(11): 1331–1335.
Singh SP. 2007. Himalayan forest ecosystem services, incorporating in national accounting. Central Himalayan Environment Association (CHEA), pp. 9–12.
Tewari A, Singh V, Phartiyal P. 2008. The potential of community managed forests for carbon trade. LEISA magazine, 24(2): 332–333.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Corresponding editor: Yu Lei
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pant, H., Tewari, A. Carbon sequestration in Chir-Pine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) forests under various disturbance levels in Kumaun Central Himalaya. Journal of Forestry Research 25, 401–405 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0424-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0424-z