Summary
The mammalian intestinal epithelium has been found, based on in vivo experiments, to be resistant to insecticidal Cry toxins, which are derived from Bacillus thuringiensis and fatally damage insect midgut cells. Thus, the toxins are commonly used as a genetic resource in insect-resistant transgenic plants for feed. However, Cry toxins bind to the cellular brush border membrane vescle (BBMV) of mammalian intestinal cells. In this study, we investigated the affinity of Cry1Ab toxin, a lepidopteran-specific Cry1-type toxin, to the cellular BBMV of two mammalian intestinal cells as well as the effect of the toxin on the membrane potential of three mammalian intestinal cells compared to its effects on the silkworm midgut cell. We found that Cry1Ab toxin did bind to the bovine and porcine BBMV, but far more weakly than it did to the silkworm midgut BBMV. Furthermore, although the silkworm midgut cells developed severe membrane potential changes within 1 h following the toxin treatment at a final concentration of 2 μg/ml, no such membraneous changes were observed on the bovine, procine, and human intestinal cells. The present in vitro results suggest that, although Cry1Ab toxin may bind weakly or nonspecifically to certain BBMV components in the mammalian intestinal cell, it does not damage the cell’s membrane integrity, thus exerting no subsequent adverse effects on the cell.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agrawal, N.; Malhotra, P.; Bhatnagar, R. K. Interaction of gene-cloned and insect cell-expressed aminopeptidase N of Spodoptera litura with insecticidal crystal protein Cry1C. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:4583–4592; 2002.
Aronson, A. I.; Shai, Y. Why Bacillis thuringiensis insecticidal toxins are so effective: unique features of their mode of action. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 195:1–8; 2001.
Baines, D.; Brownwright, A.; Schwartz, J. L. Estalishment of primary and continuous cultures of epithelial cells from larval lepidopteran midguts. J. Insect Physiol. 40:347–357; 1994.
Betz, F. S.; Hammond, B. G.; Fuchs, R. L. Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 32:156–173; 2000.
Bouclas, D.; Pendland, J. C. Principles of insect pathology, Boston/Dordrecht/London: Klirwer Academic Publishers; 1998.
Chowdhury, E. H.; Shimada, N.; Murata, H., et al. Detection of Cry1Ab protein in gastrointestinal contents but not visceral organs of genetically modified Bt11-fed calves. Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 45:72–75; 2003.
Crickmore, N.; Zeigler, D. R.; Feitelson, J.; Schnepf, E.; Van Rie, J.; Lereclus, D.; Baum, J.; Dean, D. H. Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:807–813; 1998.
Epps, D. E.; Wolfe, M. L.; Groppi, V. Characterization of the steady-state and dynamic fluorescence properties of the potential-sensitive dye bis-(1.3-dibutylbarbituric acid)trimethine oxonol (DiBAC4(3)) in model systems and cells. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 69:137–150; 1994.
Föllmann, W.; Weber, S.; Birkner, S. Primary cell cultures of bovine colon epithelium: isolation and cell culture of colonocytes. Toxicol. In Vitro 14:435–445; 2000.
Hauser, H.; Howell, K.; Dawson, R. M.; Bowyer, D. E. Rabbit small intestinal brush border membrane preparation and lipid composition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 602:567–577; 1980.
Hofmann, C.; Lüthy, P.; Hütter, R.; Piska, V. Binding of the delta endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis to brush-border membrane vesicles of the cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae). Eur. J. Biochem. 173:85–91; 1988.
Knight, P. J.; Crickmore, N.; Ellar, D. J. The receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A(c) delta-endotoxin in the brush border membrane of the lepidopteran Manduca sexta is aminopeptidase. N. Mol. Microbiol. 11:429–436; 1994.
Kuiper, H. A.; Kleter, G. A.; Noteborn, H. P.; Kok, E. J. Assessement of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant J. 27:503–528, 2001.
Lee, M. K.; Milne, R. E.; Ge, A. Z.; Dean, D. H. Location of a Bombyx mori receptor binding region on a Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin. J. Biol. Chem. 267:3115–3121; 1992.
McClintock, J. T.; Schaffer, C. R.; Sjoblad, R. D. A comparative review of the mammalian toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis-based pesticides. Pestic. Sci. 45:95–105; 1995.
Okunuki, H.; Teshima, R.; Shigeta, T.; Sakushima, J.; Akiyama, H.; Goda, Y.; Toyoda, M.; Sawada, J. Increased digestibility of two products in genetically modified food (CP4-EPSPS and Cry1Ab) after preheating. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi. 43:68–73; 2002.
Plant, A. L.; Brigham-Burke, M.; Petrella, E. C.; O’Shannessy, D. J. Phospholipid/alkanethiol bilayers for cell-surface receptor studies by surface plasmon resonance. Anal. Biochem. 226:342–348; 1995.
Sacchi, V. F.; Parenti, P.; Hanozet, G. M.; Giordana, B.; Lüthy, P.; Wolfersberger, M. G. Bacillus thuringiensis toxin inhibits K+-gradient-dependent amino acid transport across the brush border membrane of Pieris brassicae midgut cells. FEBS Lett. 204:213–218; 1986
Schenepf, E.; Crickmore, N.; Rie, J. V.; Lereclus, D.; Baum, J.; Feitelson, J.; Zeigler, D. R.; Dean, D. H. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:775–806; 1998.
Shimada, N.; Kim, Y. S.; Miyamoto, K.; Yoshioka, M.; Murata, H. Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin on mammalian cells. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 65:187–191; 2003.
Wolfersberger, M.; Lüthy, P.; Maurer, A.; Parenti, P.; Sacchi, V.; Giordana, B.; Hanozet, G. Preparation and partial characterization of amino acid transporting brush border membrane vesicles from the larval midgut of the cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 86:301–308; 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shimada, N., Miyamoto, K., Kanda, K. et al. Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crylab toxin does not affect the membrane integrity of the mammalian intestinal epithelial cells: An in vitro study. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Animal 42, 45–49 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-006-0011-0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-006-0011-0