Abstract
Unimpeded trade is one of the cooperation priorities in the Belt and Road Initiative proposed by China. On 15 May 2017, the Joint Communique of the Leaders Roundtable of the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation reaffirmed the participants’ shared commitment to build an open economy and ensure free and inclusive trade. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is not only China's new action to drive its open and global development, but also a platform for an increasing number of countries to explore free and inclusive trade and promote a universal, rule-based, open, non-discriminatory, and equitable multilateral trade system. It is therefore important to examine the topological relationship between the BRI and global trade networks. More specifically, this article first analyzes the community structure of trade networks using a community detection algorithm, and then estimates the topological relationship between different trade communities. The findings of this article are as follows. First, this research identified three trade communities and two sub-communities in the BRI trade network, in which China is the core, Russia is the sub-core of the biggest trade community, and India, United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia are cores of the second trade community (South Asia-West Asia). Second, it identified five trade communities in the global trade network, centred on China, USA, Russia, India-United Arab Emirates, and Germany- Netherlands-France-Britain and other European developed countries. Third, the topological analysis indicated that in the global trade network, most BRI countries are attracted by the core nodes of the BRI regions, such as the China, Russia and India-United Arab Emirates core nodes, and have strong trade contacts with BRI countries. Most Central-East European countries are mainly attracted by Germany-Netherlands-France-Britain and other developed European countries with a low penetration of BRI trade. Although some Southeast Asian countries are incorporated into the Asia-Australia-South Africa community with China as the core, they still need to strengthen trade linkages with BRI countries.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blondel V, Guillaume J, Lambiotte R, 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory, 25(10): 155–168.
Carolo P, Lucia T, 2015. Are preferential agreements significant for the world trade structure? A network community analysis. Kyklos, 68(2): 220–239.
Chen Y F, 2011. Analysis on social network of world trade situation in 2000–2009. Journal of International Trade, ((11): 31–42. (in Chinese)
Cinar M, Johnson J, Geusz K, 2016. Estimating Chinese trade relationships with the Silk Road countries. China & World Economy, 24(1): 5–103.
Duan W Q, Liu B Q, Ji J H, 2008. Topological structure evolution of world trade network. Systems Engineering: Theory & Practice, ((10): 71–75. (in Chinese)
Fagiolo G, Reyes J, Schiavo S, 2010. The evolution of the world trade web: A weighted-network analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(4): 479–514.
Gong P P, Song Z Y, Liu W D, 2015. Commodity structure of trade between China and countries in the Belt and Road Initiative area. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 571–580. (in Chinese)
Hakanson L, Dow D, 2012. Markets and networks in international trade: On the role of distances in globalization. Management International Review, 52(6): 761–789.
He M, Zhang N N, Huang Z Q, 2016. Analysis on competitiveness and complementarity of agricultural products tradein countries along “Belt and Road Initiative” areas. Issues in Agricultural Economy, ((11): 51–60. (in Chinese)
Henderson J, Jepson N, 2018. Critical transformations and global development: Materials for a new analytical framework. Area Development and Policy, 3(1): 1–23. (in press)
Hudson R. 2016. Rising powers and the drivers of uneven global development. Area Development and Policy, 1(3): 279–294.
Kim S, Shin E H, 2002. A longitudinal analysis of globalization and regionalization in international trade: A social network approach. Social Forces, 81(2): 445–471.
Liu W D, 2017. Inclusive globalization: New philosophy of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32(4): 311–339. (in Chinese)
Liu W D, Dunford M, 2016. Inclusive globalization: Unpacking China’s belt and road initiative. Area Development and Policy, 1(3): 323–340.
Luca D B, Lucia T, 2011. The world trade network. The World Economy, 34(8): 1417–1454.
Ma S Z, Ren W W, Wu G J, 2016. The characteristics of agricultural trade network and its impact on the division of global value chain: Based on social network analysis. Management World, ((3): 60–72. (in Chinese)
Ma Y, Xu L L, 2017. The structure and influencing factors of natural gas trade network of countries along “Belt and Road Initiative” areas. World Economy Studies, ((3): 109–121. (in Chinese)
Pick J B, Sarkar A, Johnson J, 2015. United States digital divide: State level analysis of spatial clustering and multivariate determinants of ICT utilization. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 49: 16–32.
Serrano M A, Boguá M, 2003. Topology of the world trade web. Physical Review E, 68: 015101.
Song Z Y, Che S Y, Zhang W, 2017. Spatial-temporal characteristics of foreign trade between China and countries along the silk roads. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32(4): 365–369. (in Chinese)
Wang M C, Xu K N, 2016. The dynamic relationship between bilateral trade and China’s economic growth in countries along “Belt and Road Initiative” Areas: Based on perspective of spatial interaction. World Economy Studies, ((2): 101–110. (in Chinese)
Xu H L, Sun T Y, Wu G, 2015. Status in trade networks, R&D expenditure and technology diffusion: An empirical study based on the trade data of global high-end manufacturing. China Soft Science, ((9): 55–69. (in Chinese)
Zou J L, Liu W D, 2016. Trade network of China and countries along “Belt and Road Initiative” areas from 2001 to 2013. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 36(11): 1629–1636. (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation: CAS Priority Research Program, No.XDA20010102; National Social Science Foundation of China, No.17VDL008
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, Z., Che, S. & Yang, Y. The trade network of the Belt and Road Initiative and its topological relationship to the global trade network. J. Geogr. Sci. 28, 1249–1262 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1523-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1523-8