Abstract
Topography and space are two important factors determining plant species assemblages in forest communities. Quantification of the contribution of these two factors in determining species distribution helps us to evaluate their relative importance in determining species assemblages. This study aims to disentangle the effect of topography and space on the distributions of 14 dominant species in a subtropical mixed forest. Spearman correlation analysis and the torus-translation test were used to test the species–habitat associations. Variation partitioning was used to quantify the relative contributions of topography and space at three sampling scales and three life stages. Correlation analyses and torus-translation tests showed species abundance was mostly correlated with topographic wetness index, vertical distance from the channel network and convexity. Variation partitioning showed that pure topography, pure space and spatially structured topography explained about 2.1 %, 41.2 % and 13.8 % of the variation in species distributions, respectively. For nine species, total topography fractions peaked in 20 m quadrats. For ten species, the pure space fractions peaked in 50 m quadrats. For many species, the total topography fraction and the pure space fraction were larger for the most abundant life stages, which reflected the importance of sampling effect. However, some cases did not follow this trend suggesting that the effects of ecological processes such as habitat filtering, density dependence or dispersal limitation may exceed the sampling effects. In conclusion, we found that spatially structured topography and pure space primarily shaped the distribution of dominant tree species. Furthermore, their effects were both scale- and life stage-dependent.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Whittaker RH (1956) Vegetation of the great smoky mountains. Ecol Monogr 26:1–80
Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95:137–145
Gunatilleke CVS, Gunatilleke IAUN, Esufali S et al (2006) Species–habitat associations in a Sri Lankan dipterocarp forest. J Trop Ecol 22:371–384
Valencia R, Foster RB, Villa G et al (2004) Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the amazon: large forest plot in eastern ecuador. J Ecol 92:214–229
Lai J, Mi X, Ren H et al (2009) Species–habitat associations change in a subtropical forest of China. J Veg Sci 20:415–423
Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Gravel D, Canham CD, Beaudet M et al (2006) Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. Ecol Lett 9:399–409
Bell G, Lechowicz MJ, Appenzeller A et al (1993) The spatial structure of the physical environment. Oecologia 96:114–121
Legendre P, Mi X, Ren H et al (2009) Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broad-leaved forest of China. Ecology 90:663–674
Punchi-Manage R, Wiegand T, Wiegand K et al (2013) Effect of spatial processes and topography on structuring species assemblages in a Sri Lankan dipterocarp forest. Ecology 95:376–386
Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR (2006) Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (pcnm). Ecol Model 196:483–493
De Cáceres M, Legendre P, Valencia R et al (2012) The variation of tree beta diversity across a global network of forest plots. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:1191–1202
Comita LS, Aguilar S, Pérez R et al (2007) Patterns of woody plant species abundance and diversity in the seedling layer of a tropical forest. J Veg Sci 18:163–174
Laliberté E, Paquette A, Legendre P et al (2009) Assessing the scale-specific importance of niches and other spatial processes on beta diversity: a case study from a temperate forest. Oecologia 159:377–388
Yuan Z, Gazol A, Wang X et al (2011) Scale specific determinants of tree diversity in an old growth temperate forest in China. Basic Appl Ecol 12:488–495
Condit R (1998) Tropical forest census plots: method and results from Barra Colorado Island, Panama and a comparison with other plots. Springer, Heidelberg
Harms KE, Condit R, Hubbell SP et al (2001) Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot. J Ecol 89:947–959
Tarboton DG (1997) A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 33:309–319
Lin G, Stralberg D, Gong G et al (2013) Separating the effects of environment and space on tree species distribution: from population to community. PLoS One 8:e56171
Baldeck CA, Harms KE, Yavitt JB et al (2013) Soil resources and topography shape local tree community structure in tropical forests. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:1753
Punchi-Manage R, Getzin S, Wiegand T et al (2013) Effects of topography on structuring local species assemblages in a Sri Lankan mixed dipterocarp forest. J Ecol 101:149–160
Kanagaraj R, Wiegand T, Comita LS et al (2011) Tropical tree species assemblages in topographical habitats change in time and with life stage. J Ecol 99:1441–1452
Goebel C, Hix M (1996) Development of mixed-oak forests in southeastern Ohio: a comparison of second-growth and old-growth forests. For Ecol Manag 84:1–21
Itoh A, Ohkubo T, Nanami S et al (2010) Comparison of statistical tests for habitat associations in tropical forests: a case study of sympatric dipterocarp trees in a Bornean forest. For Ecol Manag 259:323–332
Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055
O’Hara RB, Kotze DJ (2010) Do not log-transform count data. Methods Ecol Evol 1:118–122
R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing
Oksanen J, Guillaume FB, Roeland K et al (2012) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 20-5. http://CRANR-projectorg/package=vegan
Dray S, Legendre P, Blanchet FG (2007) Packfor: forward selection with permutation (canoco p. 46). R package version 00-7
Shen G, He F, Waagepetersen R et al (2013) Quantifying effects of habitat heterogeneity and other clustering processes on spatial distributions of tree species. Ecology 94:2436–2443
Lan G, Hu Y, Cao M et al (2011) Topography related spatial distribution of dominant tree species in a tropical seasonal rain forest in china. For Ecol Manag 262:1507–1513
Gilbert B, Bennett JR (2010) Partitioning variation in ecological communities: do the numbers add up? J Appl Ecol 47:1071–1082
Smith TW, Lundholm JT (2010) Variation partitioning as a tool to distinguish between niche and neutral processes. Ecography 33:648–655
Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen L, Ruokolainen K (2012) Modelling niche and neutral dynamics: on the ecological interpretation of variation partitioning results. Ecography 35:961–971
Hu Y-H, Lan G-Y, Sha L-Q et al (2012) Strong neutral spatial effects shape tree species distributions across life stages at multiple scales. PLoS One 7:e38247
Chang L-W, Zelený D, Li C-F et al (2013) Better environmental data may reverse conclusions about niche- and dispersal-based processes in community assembly. Ecology 94:2145–2151
Shipley B, Paine CET, Baraloto C (2011) Quantifying the importance of local niche-based and stochastic processes to tropical tree community assembly. Ecology 93:760–769
Jones M, Tuomisto H, Olivas C (2008) Differences in the degree of environmental control on large and small tropical plants: just a sampling effect? J Ecol 96:367–377
Baldeck CA, Harms KE, Yavitt JB et al (2013) Habitat filtering across tree life stages in tropical forest communities. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:1766
Norden N, Chave J, Belbenoit P et al (2009) Interspecific variation in seedling responses to seed limitation and habitat conditions for 14 neotropical woody species. J Ecol 97:186–197
Hu Y-H, Sha L-Q, Blanchet FG et al (2012) Dominant species and dispersal limitation regulate tree species distributions in a 20-ha plot in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Oikos 121:952–960
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Administration Bureau of the Badagongshan National Nature Reserve and many field workers for their contributions to the establishment of 25-hm2 BDGS Forest Dynamic Plot. We thank Dr. Liu Feng, Scott Franklin and Wang Jun who provided helpful suggestions on this manuscript. We would also thank Dr. Akira Itoh from Osaka City University and Dr. Yiching Lin from DungHai University providing the R codes for torus-translation test based on continuous habitat variables. We are grateful for two anonymous referees’ constructive criticism and suggestion of the manuscript. We also thank Christine Verhille at the University of British Columbia for her assistance with English language and grammatical editing of the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31270562 and 31200329) and the Chinese Forest Biodiversity Monitoring Network (29200931131101919).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Q., Xu, Y., Lu, Z. et al. Disentangling the effects of topography and space on the distributions of dominant species in a subtropical forest. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 5113–5122 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0453-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0453-9