Abstract
Soft robotics has been receiving increasing attention due to its flexibility and adaptability offered by embodied intelligence. A soft robot may undergo complex motions including stretching, contraction, bending, twisting, and their intricate combinations. Among these basic motions, bending plays a central role when a robot accomplishes tasks such as locomotion, grasping and manipulation. Although a rich repertoire of bending mechanisms has been reported, a systematic and rational design framework is still lack. In this paper, we provide a novel design strategy for soft bending actuators which allows integral modeling and design optimization. Nowadays, metamaterials are emerging as a new tool for soft robots, by encoding the desired complex motions directly within the material architectures, leading to conformable monolithic systems. We combine pneumatic actuators and flexible metamaterials to provide an alternative solution to soft bending actuators, with advantages of compact design, large bending motion, and convenient fabrication. A regular pneumatic chamber is embedded inside auxetic and non-auxetic metamaterials, and bending is generated when inflated. We carry out dimensionless analysis to identify the key design variables. To provide insight into design optimization, we develop a computation framework by modeling metamaterial structures with beam elements and the inner chamber with shell elements as an integral part, allowing efficient simulation of the coupled system. We systematically investigate how the bending angle varies with the key design variables and find the optimal design parameters. The experimental results are well in line with the simulation, and a remarkable bending motion of 0.437mm is achieved.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Rus D, Tolley M T. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 2015, 521: 467–475
Davis S, Caldwell D G. Braid effects on contractile range and friction modeling in pneumatic muscle actuators. Int J Robotics Res, 2006, 25: 359–369
Polygerinos P, Wang Z, Galloway K C, et al. Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Robotics Autonomous Syst, 2015, 73: 135–143
Ge L, Chen F, Wang D, et al. Design, modeling, and evaluation of fabric-based pneumatic actuators for soft wearable assistive gloves. Soft Robotics, 2020
Osborn L E, Dragomir A, Betthauser J L, et al. Prosthesis with neuromorphic multilayered e-dermis perceives touch and pain. Sci Robot, 2018, 3: eaat3818
Liang Z, Cheng J, Zhao Q, et al. High-performance flexible tactile sensor enabling intelligent haptic perception for a soft prosthetic hand. Adv Mater Technol, 2019, 4: 1900317
Hawkes E W, Blumenschein L H, Greer J D, et al. A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth. Sci Robot, 2017, 2: eaan3028
Zhang J, Wang T, Wang J, et al. Dynamic modeling and simulation of inchworm movement towards bio-inspired soft robot design. Bioinspir Biomim, 2019, 14: 066012
Cao J, Liang W, Ren Q, et al. Modelling and control of a novel soft crawling robot based on a dielectric elastomer actuator. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2018. 1–9
Yang Y, Chen Y, Li Y, et al. Bioinspired robotic fingers based on pneumatic actuator and 3D printing of smart material. Soft Robotics, 2017, 4: 147–162
Chen F, Xu W, Zhang H, et al. Topology optimized design, fabrication, and characterization of a soft cable-driven gripper. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2018, 3: 2463–2470
Calisti M, Giorelli M, Levy G, et al. An octopus-bioinspired solution to movement and manipulation for soft robots. Bioinspir Biomim, 2011, 6: 036002
Ilievski F, Mazzeo A D, Shepherd R F, et al. Soft robotics for chemists. Angew Chem, 2011, 123: 1930–1935
Yang C, Kang R, Branson D T, et al. Kinematics and statics of eccentric soft bending actuators with external payloads. Mechanism Machine Theor, 2019, 139: 526–541
Galloway K C, Polygerinos P, Walsh C J, et al. Mechanically programmable bend radius for fiber-reinforced soft actuators. In: Proceedings of the 2013 16th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR) [Internet]. Montevideo, Uruguay: IEEE, 2013. 1–6
Wang Z, Polygerinos P, Overvelde J T B, et al. Interaction forces of soft fiber reinforced bending actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2017, 22: 717–727
Elsayed Y, Vincensi A, Lekakou C, et al. Finite element analysis and design optimization of a pneumatically actuating silicone module for robotic surgery applications. Soft Robotics, 2014, 1: 255–262
Hiller J, Lipson H. Automatic design and manufacture of soft robots. IEEE Trans Robot, 2012, 28: 457–466
Chen F, Liu K, Wang Y, et al. Automatic design of soft dielectric elastomer actuators with optimal spatial electric fields. IEEE Trans Robot, 2019, 35: 1150–1165
Zhang H, Wang M Y, Chen F, et al. Design and development of a soft gripper with topology optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2017. 6239–6244
Zhang H, Kumar A S, Chen F, et al. Topology optimized multimaterial soft fingers for applications on grippers, rehabilitation, and artificial hands. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2018, 24: 120–131
Rafsanlani A, Bertoldi K, Studart A R. Programming soft robots with flexible mechanical metamaterials. Sci Robot, 2019, 4: eaav7874
Mark A G, Palagi S, Qiu T, et al. Auxetic metamaterial simplifies soft robot design. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) [Internet]. Stockholm: IEEE. 2016. 4951–4956
Goswami D, Liu S, Pal A, et al. 3D-architected soft machines with topologically encoded motion. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 1808713
Han Y, Lu W. Optimizing the deformation behavior of stent with nonuniform Poisson’s ratio distribution for curved artery. J Mech Behav BioMed Mater, 2018, 88: 442–452
Hasse A, Mauser K. Poisson induced bending actuator for soft robotic systems. Soft Robotics, 2020, 7: 155–167
Lakes R. Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Science, 1987, 235: 1038–1040
Bertoldi K, Reis P M, Willshaw S, et al. Negative Poisson’s ratio behavior induced by an elastic instability. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 361–366
Babaee S, Shim J, Weaver J C, et al. 3D soft metamaterials with negative Poisson’s ratio. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 5044–5049
Lipson H. Challenges and opportunities for design, simulation, and fabrication of soft robots. Soft Robotics, 2014, 1: 21–27
Duriez C, Bieze T. Soft robot modeling, simulation and control in realtime. In: Laschi C, Rossiter J, Iida F, et al, eds. Soft Robotics: Trends, Applications and Challenges [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. 103–109
Truby R L, Lewis J A. Printing soft matter in three dimensions. Nature, 2016, 540: 371–378
Wallin T J, Pikul J, Shepherd R F. 3D printing ofsoftrobotic systems. Nat Rev Mater, 2018, 3: 84–100
Wu J, Wang J, Wang L, et al. Dynamics and control of a planar 3-DOF parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy. Mechanism Machine Theor, 2009, 44: 835–849
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51905340), and the Shanghai Sailing Program (Grant No. 19YF1422900).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, Q., Chen, S., Chen, F. et al. Programmable soft bending actuators with auxetic metamaterials. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 63, 2518–2526 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1741-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1741-2