Abstract
This paper reports on the use of qualitative analysis to inform a risk analysis framework for decentralised water systems. To realise the benefits from these technologies, a methodology is applied to learn from previous difficulties in implementing and managing them. A workshop process was used to capture stories from industry professionals on difficulties they have encountered in planning and implementation. Qualitative analysis of story narratives revealed stages where there was some type of development process failure; as well as failure modes and factors influencing the difficulties encountered. The analysis also generated insights: difficulties in one part of the development process tends to propagate to subsequent stages; system difficulties most often occurred in the policy stage of development due to institutional inertia and lack of adaptive governance; and the best indicator of problems with a decentralised system was complaints of poor water quality. Furthermore, this paper also provides a method to learn from past difficulties by identifying what data needs to be collected in order to populate a risk model which can be used for improving risk assessment of the development process for decentralised systems. This can provide a basis for better decision making, policy and guidelines; an important factor in mainstream acceptance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Biggs C, Ryan C, Wiseman J, Larsen K (2009) Distributed Water Systems: a networked and localised approach for sustainable water services, Victorian Eco-Innovation Lab (VEIL). University of Melbourne, Australia
Brown RR, Farrelly MA (2009a) Challenges ahead: social and institutional factors influencing sustainable urban stormwater management in Australia. Water Sci Technol 59(4):653–660
Brown RR, Farrelly MA (2009b) Delivering sustainable urban water management: a review of the hurdles we face. Water Sci Technol 59(5):839–846
Brown RR, Keath N, Wong THF (2009a) Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes. Water Sci Technol 59(5):847–855
Brown RR, Sharp L, Ashley RM (2009b) Implementation impediments to institutionalising the practice of sustainable urban water management. Water Sci Technol 54(6–7):415–422
Burkhard R, Deletic A, Craig A (2000) Techniques for water and wastewater management: a review of techniques and their integration in planning. Urban Water 2(3):197–221
Carr V, Tah JHM (2001) A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment and analysis: construction project risk management system. Adv Eng Softw 32:847–857
Dray A, Perez P, Jones N, Le Page C, D’Aquino P, White I, Auatabu T (2006) The AtollGame experience: from knowledge engineering to a computer-assisted role playing game. JASSS 9(1)6. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/1/6.html
Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31:1257–1274
Geels FW (2010) Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res Policy 39:495–510
Gikas P, Tchobanoglous G (2009) The role of satellite and decentralised strategies in water resources management. J Environ Manag 90:144–152
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction, Piscataway
Hurlimann A, Dolnicar S (2009) When public opposition defeats alternative water projects—the Case of Toowoomba Australia. Water Res 44:287–297
Idea Works (2009) Qualrus—The intelligent qualitative analysis program. http://www.qualrus.com/. Accessed 13 Oct 2009
Kelle U (2005) “Emergence” vs. “Forcing” of empirical data? A crucial problem of “Grounded Theory” reconsidered. Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 6(2), Art. 27
Kemp R (1994) Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability: the problem of technological regime shifts. Futures 26(10):1023–1046
Livingston D, Ashbolt N, Colebatch H (2006) Institutional barriers to decentralised systems. Journal of the Australian Water Association, May 2006, pp 75–77
Lyons T, Skitmore M (2004) Project risk management in the Queensland engineering construction industry: a survey. Int J Proj Manag 22:51–61
Mitchell CA, Abeysuriya KR, Willetts JR (2008) Institutional arrangements for onsite and decentralised systems: needs and opportunities for key players in the field of distributed wastewater management. In: Proceedings of onsite and decentralised sewerage & recycling conference coming clean: sustainable backyards and beyond! Benalla, Australia
Moglia M, Sharma A (2009) Incorporating the social dimension into the assessment of urban water services: with a particular focus on Greenfield developments. CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship Report Series, ISSN: 1834–6618, Melbourne, Australia. http://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/waterforahealthycountry/2009/wfhc-social-dimension-urban-water-services.pdf
Moglia M, Perez P, Burn S (2009) Small town water governance in developing countries: the uncertainty curse. In: 18th world IMACS/MODSIM congress. Cairns, Australia
Reid SG (1999) Perception and communication of risk, and the importance of dependability. Struct Saf 21:373–384
Sharma A, Grant A, Grant T, Pamminger F, Opray L (2009) Environmental and economic assessment of urban water services for a Greenfield development. Environ Eng Sci 26(5):921–934
Tjandraatmadja GF, Burn LS, McLaughlin M, Biswas T (2005) Rethinking urban water systems – revisiting concepts in urban wastewater collection and treatment to ensure infrastructure sustainability. Water Sci Technol: Water supply 5(2):145–154
Tjandraatmadja G, Cook S, Sharma A, Diaper C, Grant A, Toifl M, Barron O, Burn S, Gregory A (2009) Icon water sensitive urban developments. CSIRO Water for a Health Country, Melbourne, Australia
Zhang Y, Grant A, Sharma A, Chen D, Chen L (2009) Assessment of rainwater use and greywater reuse in high-rise buildings in a brownfield site. Water Sci Technol 60(3):575–581
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moglia, M., Cook, S., Sharma, A.K. et al. Assessing Decentralised Water Solutions: Towards a Framework for Adaptive Learning. Water Resour Manage 25, 217–238 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9696-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9696-7