Abstract
Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) is a relatively new approach in Bolivia. However, it is now generally accepted that this approach needs to be established in order to find sustainable solutions for development and is actively promoted by the Water Ministry, especially in environmentally fragile regions, such as the Lake Poopo basin. The Lake Poopo basin is one of the poorest regions in the Bolivian Altiplano. It is confronted with severe water scarcity during the dry season, leading to low water quality, a high water-poverty index and low values of the watershed sustainability index. Furthermore, salinization and environmental degradation of soil and water are forcing people to migrate to urban areas. These are some of the factors underlying an ever-increasing complexity in integrated water resources management in the region. This paper proposes and develops a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in the Lake Poopo basin, based on economic, social and environmental criteria in an uncertain decision environment in order to support stakeholders in managing their water resources. Saaty’s analytical hierarchy process (AHP) theory is applied here to solve the MCDA and to identify the alternatives using the highest expected utility value. The paper identifies the best solutions for existing conflicts, while promoting interaction with stakeholders and instruments in order to reach a sustainable strategy for water resources management in this water-scarce region.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Al-Subhi Al-Harbi KM (2001) Application of the AHP in project management. Int J Proj Manag 19:19–27
Babel MS, Das Gupta A, Nayak DK (2005) A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands. Water Resour Manag 19:693–712
Baloch MA, Tanık A (2008) Development of an integrated watershed management strategy for resource conservation in Balochistan Province of Pakistan. Desalination 226(1–3):38–46
Bana e Costa CA, Vansnick JC (2008) A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP. Eur J Oper Res 187:1422–1428
Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 34:187–195
Castelleti A, Soncini-Sessa R (2007) Topics on system analysis and integrated water resources management. Elsevier, Cambridge
Cosgrove WJ, Rijsberman FR (2000) World Water vision report 2000. Making water everybody’s business. World Water Council (WWC)
Davis D, Cosenza RM (1993) Business research for decision making, 3rd edn. PWS-Kent, Boston
Dodgson J, Spackman M, Pearman A, Philips L (2000) Multi-criteria analysis manual. National Economic Research Associates (NERA), London
Dong Y, Xu Y, Li H, Dai M (2008) A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP. Eur J Oper Res 186:229–242
EU-WFD (2000) The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2000/60/EC of October 23, 2000, establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy (European Water Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Communities, L327/1 of 22 December 2000
Feás J, Giupponi C, Rosato P (2004) Water management, public participation and decision support systems: the MULINO Approach. In: Proceedings of the international conference 2004 of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), Osnabrück, Germany, 14–17 June 2004. http://www.iemss.org/iemss2004/. Accessed 23 Nov 2009
Feng G (2001) Strategies for sustainable water resources management in water scare regions in developing countries. In: Integrated water resources management, proceedings of symposium, Davis, California 2000
Finan JS, Hurley WJ (1999) Transitive calibration of the AHP verbal scale. Eur J Oper Res 112:367–372
Gesteland R (2005) Cross-cultural business behavior. negotiating, selling, sourcing and managing across cultures, 4th edn. Business School Press, Copenhagen
Gibney R, Shang J (2007) Decision making in academia: a case of the dean selection process. Math Comput Model 46(7–8):1030–1040
González-Pachón J, Romero C (2004) A method for dealing with inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons. Eur J Oper Res 158:351–361
Greeno JG (1976) Indefinite goals in well-structured problems. Psychol Rev 83:479–491
Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553–1566
Hermans L (2006) Stakeholder-oriented valuation to support water resources management. Confronting concepts with local practice. FAO Water Reports 30, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Just RE, Netanyahu S (1998) Conflict and cooperation on trans-boundary water resources. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Kampragou E, Eleftheriadou E, Mylopoulos Y (2007) Implementing equitable water allocation in transboundary catchments: the case of river Nestos/Mesta. Water Resour Manag 21:909–918
Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Koch H, Grünewald U (2009) A comparison of modeling systems for the development and revision of water resources management plans. Water Resour Manag 23(7):1403–1422
Lewis RD (2007) When cultures collide. Leading across cultures, 3rd rev. edn. Brealey, Boston
Linares P (2009) Decision support. Are inconsistent decisions better? An experiment with pairwise comparisons. Eur J Oper Res 193:492–498
Mattos RR, Crespo A (2000) Informe nacional sobre la gestión del agua en Bolivia. CEPAL, La Paz
McNulty H (1986) The importance of the hundredth meridian to the uses and management of water. In: Cairns J, Patrick R (eds) Managing water resources. Praeger, New York, pp 100–116
Montoya JC, Mendieta RS (2006) Salinización y metales pesados. Evaluación ambiental de la Mina Kori Kollo con aplicación de la Teledetección SIG. Los amigos del Libro, La Paz
UN (1992) The Dublin statement on water and sustainable development. Guiding principles. International Conference on Water and the Environment (ICWE) in Dublin, Ireland, January 1992, conference report
Oeltjenbruns H, William J, Kolarik WJ, Schnadt-Kirschner R (1995) Strategic planning in manufacturing systems—AHP application to an equipment replacement decision. Int J Prod Econ 38(2–3):189–197
Opricovic S (2009) A compromise solution in water resources planning. Water Resour Manag 23(8):1549–1561
Phumpiu P, Gustafsson JE (2009) When are partnerships a viable tool for development? Institutions and partnerships for water and sanitation service in Latin America. Water Resour Manag 23(1):19–38
Reyes E, Day JW, Lara-Domínguez AL, Sánchez-Gil P, Lomelí DZ, Yáñez-Arancibia A (2004) Assessing coastal management plans using watershed spatial models for the Mississippi delta, USA, and the Ususmacinta–Grijalva delta, Mexico. Ocean Coast Manag 47(11–12):693–708
Rontentalp M, Rieckermann J, Daebel H (2005) Management efforts at Lake Titicaca. The Science and Politics of International Freshwater Management. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG)
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26
Saaty TL (1995) Decision making for leaders. 1995/1996 edn., completely revised. RWS, Pittsburgh
Saaty TL (2003) Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. Eur J Oper Res 145:85–91
Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98
Stein WE, Mizzi PJ (2007) Decision support. The harmonic consistency index for the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 177:488–497
Van Damme P (2002) CONIAG/CGIAB disponibilidad, uso y calidad de los recursos hídricos en Bolivia. La Paz
von Winterfeldt D (1980) Structuring decision problems for decision analysis. Acta Psychol 45:71–93
Wei TH (1952) The algebraic foundations of ranking theory. Cambridge University Press, London
Zhang H (2009) The analysis of the reasonable structure of water conservancy investment of capital construction in China by AHP method. Water Resour Manag 23:1–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calizaya, A., Meixner, O., Bengtsson, L. et al. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in the Lake Poopo Basin, Bolivia. Water Resour Manage 24, 2267–2289 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9551-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9551-x